Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2025, 71(6):298-307 | DOI: 10.17221/399/2024-AGRICECON

Unintended consequences of trade in environmental innovation: Agricultural emissions, sectoral leakage, and the Kuznets curve hypothesisOriginal Paper

Xinyi Gu1, Jianmin Li1, Farzan Yahya ORCID...2, Muhammad Waqas1, Amad Rashid3
1 School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Jiangsu, P.R. China
2 School of Economics and Management, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Jiangxi, P.R. China
3 School of Management, Forman Christian College University, Lahore, Pakistan

Mitigating emissions from the agricultural sector is crucial for achieving sustainable development goals. However, controlling emissions in one sector can lead to unintended consequences in others through leakage effects. Grounded in the theoretical propositions of sectoral shift theory (SST), the rebound effect, and leakage effects, this study investigates the asymmetric impact of environmentally sound technology (EST) imports and exports on agricultural emissions (N₂O and methane) within the framework of the agricultural Kuznets curve (AKC). Utilising a balanced panel dataset of 105 countries from 2010 to 2020, we employ the Westerlund cointegration test to establish long-run relationships among variables. Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) estimations reveal a positive effect of EST imports and exports on agricultural N₂O emissions, intensifying the impact at higher quantiles. This suggests that industrial emission reductions through EST may have unintended consequences in agriculture via two mechanisms: emission leakage from industry to agriculture and increased agricultural emissions resulting from productivity improvements through the rebound effect. Nevertheless, in line with SST, our results indicate that sustainable agricultural trade can contribute to mitigating agricultural emissions. The AKC hypothesis holds across almost all models. These findings underscore the importance of developing tailored policies to design EST specifically for the agricultural sector, ensuring more effective emission reductions.

Keywords: greenhouse gas emissions; environmental technology; quantile regression; rebound effect; carbon leakage; sustainable agriculture

Received: October 21, 2024; Revised: February 27, 2025; Accepted: March 31, 2025; Published: June 27, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gu X, Li J, Yahya F, Waqas M, Rashid A. Unintended consequences of trade in environmental innovation: Agricultural emissions, sectoral leakage, and the Kuznets curve hypothesis. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2025;71(6):298-307. doi: 10.17221/399/2024-AGRICECON.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file399-2024_ESM_4.pdf

File size: 175.3 kB

References

  1. Abbasi K.R., Zhang Q. (2024): Augmenting agricultural sustainability: Investigating the role of agricultural land, green innovation, and food production in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable Development, 32: 6918-6933. Go to original source...
  2. Anwar A., Siddique M., Dogan E., Sharif A. (2021): The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for asean countries: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 164: 956-967. Go to original source...
  3. Beck U.R., Kruse-Andersen P.K., Stewart L.B. (2023): Carbon leakage in a small open economy: The importance of international climate policies. Energy Economics, 117: 106447. Go to original source...
  4. Busch J., Amarjargal O. (2022): 100 global bright spots of green growth: Co-occurrence of nighttime light gain and forest gain, 1990-2015. Global Environmental Change, 75: 102556. Go to original source...
  5. Canay I.A. (2011): A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 14: 368-386. Go to original source...
  6. Chataut G., Bhatta B., Joshi D., Subedi K., Kafle K. (2023): Greenhouse gases emission from agricultural soil: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 11: 100533. Go to original source...
  7. Czyżewski B., Kryszak Ł. (2018): Impact of different models of agriculture on greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions: A sectoral approach. Outlook on Agriculture, 47: 68-76. Go to original source...
  8. Davino C., Furno M., Vistocco D. (2013): Quantile regression: Theory and applications. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons: 38. Go to original source...
  9. Depledge J., Saldivia M., Peñasco C. (2022): Glass half full or glass half empty?: The 2021 glasgow climate conference. Climate Policy, 22: 147-157. Go to original source...
  10. Driscoll J.C., Kraay A.C. (1998): Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 549-560. Go to original source...
  11. Du Y., Liu H., Huang H., Li X. (2023): The carbon emission reduction effect of agricultural policy - Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406: 137005. Go to original source...
  12. Duxbury J.M., Mosier A.R. (2022): Status and issues concerning agricultural emissions of greenhouse gases. In: Agricultural dimensions of global climate change. London, Routledge: 229-258. Go to original source...
  13. Filonchyk M., Peterson M.P., Zhang L., Hurynovich V., He Y. (2024): Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: Examining the influence of CO2, CH4, and N2O. Science of the Total Environment: 173359. Go to original source...
  14. Foong A., Pradhan P., Frör O., Kropp J.P. (2022): Adjusting agricultural emissions for trade matters for climate change mitigation. Nature Communications, 13: 3024. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Habiba U., Xinbang C., Anwar A. (2022): Do green technology innovations, financial development, and renewable energy use help to curb carbon emissions? Renewable Energy, 193: 1082-1093. Go to original source...
  16. Haider A., Bashir A., ul Husnain M.I. (2020): Impact of agricultural land use and economic growth on nitrous oxide emissions: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 741: 140421. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Han H., Zhou Z. (2024): The rebound effect of energy consumption and its determinants in China's agricultural production. Energy, 290: 129961. Go to original source...
  18. Hassapoyannes K., Blandford D. (2019): Agriculture and climate change: National and international policy response. In: Global challenges for future food and agricultural policies. World Scientific: 217-248. Go to original source...
  19. Ike G.N., Usman O., Sarkodie S.A. (2020): Testing the role of oil production in the environmental kuznets curve of oil producing countries: New insights from method of moments quantile regression. Science of the Total Environment, 711: 135208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Khatri-Chhetri A., Sapkota T.B., Maharjan S., Konath N.C., Shirsath P. (2023): Agricultural emissions reduction potential by improving technical efficiency in crop production. Agricultural Systems, 207: 103620. Go to original source...
  21. Koenker R., Bassett Jr G. (1978): Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46: 33-50. Go to original source...
  22. Laborde D., Mamun A., Martin,W., Piñeiro V., Vos R. (2020): Modeling the impacts of agricultural support policies on emissions from agriculture (No. w27202). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w27202 (accessed July 28, 2024). Go to original source...
  23. Lee C.C., Yuan Z., Lee C.C. (2023): A nonlinear analysis of the impacts of information and communication technologies on environmental quality: A global perspective. Energy Economics, 128: 107177. Go to original source...
  24. Lee C.C., He Z.W., Wen H. (2024a): The impact of digitalization on green economic efficiency: Empirical evidence from city-level panel data in China. Energy & Environment, 35: 23-46. Go to original source...
  25. Lee C.C., Yahya F., Sultanuzzaman M.R. (2024b): Monetary policy uncertainty and agricultural climate risk: Does the agricultural kuznets curve exist? Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 27: 631-654. Go to original source...
  26. Lee C.C., Yahya F. (2024): Mitigating energy instability: The influence of trilemma choices, financial development, and technology advancements. Energy Economics: 133: 107517. Go to original source...
  27. Leng Y., Liu X., Wang X. (2023): Environmental regulation and high-quality agricultural development. PloS One, 18: e0285687. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Li J., Yahya F., Waqas M. (2024): Exploring the nexus of globalization and natural resource scarcity in driving green technology innovation: Insights from advanced panel data techniques. Natural Resources Forum, 49: 1965-1995. Go to original source...
  29. Lin B., Ma R. (2022): Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in china: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176: 121434. Go to original source...
  30. Machado J.A., Silva J.S. (2019): Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213: 145-173. Go to original source...
  31. Magazzino C., Cerulli G., Shahzad U., Khan S. (2023): The nexus between agricultural land use, urbanization, and greenhouse gas emissions: Novel implications from different stages of income levels. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 14: 101846. Go to original source...
  32. Mamun A., Martin W., Tokgoz S. (2021): Reforming agricultural support for improved environmental outcomes. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43: 1520-1549. Go to original source...
  33. Marcus N.S., Nwaeze N.C. (2024): Policy and institution for environmental sustainability and agricultural emission in west africa. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21: 3445-3452. Go to original source...
  34. Meiling L., Yahya F., Waqas M., Shaohua Z., Ali S.A., Hania A. (2021): Boosting sustainability in healthcare sector through fintech: Analyzing the moderating role of financial and ict development. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 58: 00469580211028174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Milindi C.B., Inglesi-Lotz R. (2022): The role of green technology on carbon emissions: Does it differ across countries' income levels? Applied Economics, 54: 3309-3339. Go to original source...
  36. Montoya M., Vallejo A., Corrochano-Monsalve M., Aguilera E., Sanz-Cobena A., Ginés C., González-Murua C., Álvarez J.M., Guardia G. (2021): Mitigation of yield-scaled nitrous oxide emissions and global warming potential in an oilseed rape crop through n source management. Journal of Environmental Management, 288: 112304. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Ogle S.M., Conant R.T., Fischer B., Haya B.K., Manning D.T., McCarl B.A., Zelikova T.J. (2023): Policy challenges to enhance soil carbon sinks: The dirty part of making contributions to the paris agreement by the united states. Carbon Management, 14: 2268071. Go to original source...
  38. Pan A., Sun Q., Wang Q., Chunga J., Zong Z., Fei R. (2021): Energy rebound effect associated with energy efficiency: An application to China's agricultural sector. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18: 3819-3832. Go to original source...
  39. Paul C., Bartkowski B., Dönmez C., Don A., Mayer S., Steffens M., Weigl S., Wiesmeier M., Wolf A., Helming K. (2023): Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation? Journal of Environmental Management, 330: 117142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Pekkarinen V. (2020): Going beyond CO2: Strengthening action on global methane emissions under the un climate regime. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29: 464-478. Go to original source...
  41. Phuc Nguyen C., Schinckus C., Dinh Su T. (2020): Economic integration and CO2 emissions: Evidence from emerging economies. Climate and Development, 12: 369-384. Go to original source...
  42. Sharif A., Saqib N., Dong K., Khan S.A.R. (2022): Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation. Sustainable Development, 30: 1934-1946. Go to original source...
  43. Sharma G.D., Shah M.I., Shahzad U., Jain M., Chopra R. (2021): Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in bimstec region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. Journal of Environmental Management, 297: 113316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Sultanuzzaman M.R., Yahya F., Lee C.C. (2024): Exploring the complex interplay of green finance, business cycles, and energy development. Energy, 306: 132479. Go to original source...
  45. Tarazkar M.H., Kargar Dehbidi N., Ansari R.A., Pourghasemi H.R. (2021): Factors affecting methane emissions in opec member countries: Does the agricultural production matter? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23: 6734-6748. Go to original source...
  46. Tian H., Xu R., Canadell J.G., Thompson R.L., Winiwarter W., Suntharalingam P., Davidson E.A., Ciais P., Jackson R.B., Janssens-Maenhout G. (2020): A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature, 586: 248-256. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Uddin M.M.M. (2020): What are the dynamic links between agriculture and manufacturing growth and environmental degradation? Evidence from different panel income countries. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 7: 100041. Go to original source...
  48. van de Ven D.J., Mittal S., Gambhir A., Lamboll R.D., Doukas H., Giarola S., Hawkes A., Koasidis K., Köberle A.C., McJeon H. (2023): A multimodel analysis of post-glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges. Nature Climate Change, 13: 570-578. Go to original source...
  49. Waldmann E. (2018): Quantile regression: A short story on how and why. Statistical Modelling, 18: 203-218. Go to original source...
  50. Wang L., Vo X.V., Shahbaz M., Ak A. (2020): Globalization and carbon emissions: Is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of cop21? Journal of Environmental Management, 268: 110712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Yahya F., Lee C.C. (2023a): The asymmetric effect of agriculturalization toward climate neutrality targets. Journal of Environmental Management, 328: 116995. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Yahya F., Lee C.C. (2023b): Disentangling the asymmetric effect of financialization on the green output gap. Energy Economics, 125: 106899. Go to original source...
  53. Zambrano-Monserrate M.A., Fernandez M.A. (2017): An environmental kuznets curve for N2O emissions in Germany: An ARDL approach. Natural Resources Forum, 41: 119-127. Go to original source...
  54. Zhen W., Qin Q., Miao L. (2023): The greenhouse gas rebound effect from increased energy efficiency across China's staple crops. Energy Policy, 173: 113398. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.