Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2025, 71(2):59-70 | DOI: 10.17221/82/2024-AGRICECON
Protection of geographical indication products and sustainable agricultural development: The role of public policiesOriginal Paper
- 1 Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- 2 Postdoctoral Station of Applied Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- 3 Postdoctoral Research Station of Guangxi Beibu Gulf Bank, Nanning, P.R. China
This research employed co-word clustering analysis to classify 62 geographical indication (GI) protection policies from 2009 to 2023 into three distinct types. Employing Sankey diagrams, we dynamically analysed the evolution of these policy tools. These insights provide valuable experiential guidance for reforming and innovating China’s GI protection system and agricultural sustainable development.
Keywords: agricultural sustainability; policy tool; Sankey diagram; agricultural sustainability
Received: March 4, 2024; Revised: November 6, 2024; Accepted: November 13, 2024; Published: February 28, 2025 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Callon M., Courtial J.P., Turner W.A., Bauin S. (1983): From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22: 191-235.
Go to original source...
- Curzi D., Huysmans M. (2022): The impact of protecting EU geographical indications in trade agreements. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104: 364-384.
Go to original source...
- De Filippis F., Giua M., Salvatici L., Vaquero-Piñeiro C. (2022): The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope? Food Policy, 112: 102371.
Go to original source...
- De Rosa M., Masi M., Apostolico L., Bartoli L., Francescone M. (2023): Geographical indications and risks of unsustainability linked to 'disaffection effects' in the dairy sector. Agriculture, 13: 333.
Go to original source...
- Falasco S., Caputo P., Garrone P. (2024): Can geographical indications promote environmental sustainability in food supply chains? Insights from a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444: 141100.
Go to original source...
- Gao Y., Zhao T.H., Xu X.L., Ndidiamaka A.P. (2023): Can agricultural protectionist policies help achieve food security in Nigeria? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7: 1095914.
Go to original source...
- Glogovetan A.I., Dabija D.C., Fiore M., Pocol C.B. (2022): Consumer perception and understanding of European Union quality schemes: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14: 1667.
Go to original source...
- Joosse S., Olders P., Boonstra W.J. (2021): Why are geographical indications unevenly distributed over Europe? British Food Journal, 123: 490-510.
Go to original source...
- Kim G.J. (2022): Examining the predictors of medical marijuana legalisation in the United States using an empirically based taxonomy approach. Policy Studies, 43: 183-202.
Go to original source...
- Krause R.M., Hawkins C.V., Park A.Y., Feiock R.C. (2019): Drivers of policy instrument selection for environmental management by local governments. Public Administration Review, 79: 477-487.
Go to original source...
- Li C., Gao J., Ge L., Hu W., Ban Q. (2023): Do geographical indication products promote the growth of the agricultural economy? An empirical study based on meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15: 14428.
Go to original source...
- Li C., Ban Q., Gao J., Ge L., Xu R. (2024a): The role of geographical indication products in promoting agricultural development - A meta-analysis based on global data. Agriculture, 14: 1831.
Go to original source...
- Li C., Ban Q., Ge L., Qi L., Fan C. (2024b): The relationship between geographical indication products and farmers' incomes based on meta-analysis. Agriculture, 14: 798.
Go to original source...
- Lupton R.C., Allwood J.M. (2017): Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 124: 141-151.
Go to original source...
- Mamba E., Ali E. (2022): Do agricultural exports enhance agricultural (economic) growth? Lessons from ECOWAS countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 63: 257-267.
Go to original source...
- Mukherjee I. (2021): Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument 'Compounds': A renewable energy policy perspective. Policy and Society, 40: 312-332.
Go to original source...
- Pamukcu H., Sarac O., Aytugar S., Sandikci M. (2021): The effects of local food and local products with geographical indication on the development of tourism gastronomy. Sustainability, 13: 6692.
Go to original source...
- Rothwell R., Zegveld W. (1984): An assessment of government innovation policies. Review of Policy Research, 3: 436-444.
Go to original source...
- Stewart J. (1996): Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems - Howlett, M, Ramesh, M. Australian Journal of Political Science, 31: 265-266.
- Yang J., Zhang Y., Chen L. (2022): Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of factors that influence skilled talents scarcity in agricultural industry: Case study of 14 cities in Hunan Province. Agronomy, 12: 3155.
Go to original source...
- Zhou K., Lu F., Ruan Y., Jiang X., Yu L. (2023): Research on the influence and mechanism of cross-border E-commerce on the quality of agricultural products exported by China. Journal of Global Information Management, 31: 321190.
Go to original source...
- Zhao K., Ye J.M. (2023): Implementation strategy of MEI policy and SME innovation: A Chinese analysis. Economic Research - Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 36: 2120036.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.