Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2023, 69(12):485-497 | DOI: 10.17221/232/2023-AGRICECON

Trust evolution, institutional constraints, and land trusteeship decisions among Chinese farmersOriginal Paper

Qi Li1, Menghui Gao1
1 School of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong, China

Land trusteeship involves farmers entrusting the farming and managing of their land to trustees, who manage the land on their behalf in exchange for a commission fee. Land trusteeship has been an important approach to bridging the gap between smallholder farmers and modern agriculture in China. Because of the information asymmetry in land trusteeship, farmers have higher uncertainty and perceived risk, so social trust and institutional constraints are particularly important in promoting farmers’ participation in trusteeship. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of trust evolution and institutional constraints on smallholder farmers’ decision-making in green prevention and pest control trusteeship. Our research was conducted in Shandong, China, utilising factor analysis and binary regression. The results revealed that trusteeship decision-making combines trust governance and institutional governance, with significant roles played by institutional trust, institutional supervision, institutional regulation, and interpersonal trust. As part-time farming became more prevalent, the importance of institutional trust and institutional supervision increased, indicating a shift in trusteeship governance from social relations to institutional contracts and the maturation of land trusteeship models. In addition, we also tested the interaction effect of social trust and institutional constraints and the heterogeneity effect of different trusteeship contracts. To improve the land trust system, we must enhance farmers’ institutional trust and leverage the active role of intermediary supervision organisations such as village collectives.

Keywords: households; institutional regulation; institutional supervision; institutional trust; land trust; relational trust

Received: July 12, 2023; Revised: November 13, 2023; Accepted: November 30, 2023; Prepublished online: December 14, 2023; Published: December 19, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Li Q, Gao M. Trust evolution, institutional constraints, and land trusteeship decisions among Chinese farmers. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2023;69(12):485-497. doi: 10.17221/232/2023-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Chen T., Rizwan M., Abbas A. (2022): Exploring the role of agricultural services in production efficiency in Chinese agriculture: A case of the socialized agricultural service system. Land, 11: 347. Go to original source...
    2. Coleman J. (1990): Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: 1014.
    3. Daskalopoulou I. (2019): Individual-level evidence on the causal relationship between social trust and institutional trust. Social Indicators Research, 144: 275-298. Go to original source...
    4. De Vries J. R., Van der Zee E., Beunen R., Kat R., Feindt P.H. (2019): Trusting the people and the system. The interrelation between interpersonal and institutional trust in collective action for agri-environmental management. Sustainability, 11: 7022. Go to original source...
    5. Du Y., Liu P., Ravenscroft N., Su S. (2020): Changing community relations in southeast China: The role of Guanxi in rural environmental governance. Agriculture and Human Values, 37: 833-847. Go to original source...
    6. Fischer S., Wollni M. (2018): The role of farmers' trust, risk and time preferences for contract choices: Experimental evidence from the Ghanaian pineapple sector. Food Policy, 81: 67-81. Go to original source...
    7. Gao Y., Zhang X., Lu J., Wu L., Yin S. (2017): Adoption behavior of green control techniques by family farms in China: Evidence from 676 family farms in Huang-huai-hai plain. Crop Protection, 99: 76-84. Go to original source...
    8. Glanville J.L., Andersson M.A., Paxton P. (2013): Do social connections create trust? An examination using new longitudinal data. Social Forces, 92: 545-562. Go to original source...
    9. Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2004): The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94: 526-556. Go to original source...
    10. Ihli H., Seegers R., Winter E., Chiputwa B., Gassner A. (2022): Preferences for tree fruit market attributes among smallholder farmers in Eastern Rwanda. Agricultural Economics, 53: 5-21. Go to original source...
    11. Hart O., Moore J. (1990): Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 1119-1158. Go to original source...
    12. Key N. (2019): Farm size and productivity growth in the United States Corn Belt. Food Policy, 84: 186-195. Go to original source...
    13. Luhmann N. (1968): Trust: A mechanism for the reduction of social complexity. Philosophy and History, 1: 183-184. Go to original source...
    14. Luo Y. (2002): Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 903-919. Go to original source...
    15. Luo F., Wang Q., Sun F.M., Xu D., Sun C.H. (2018): Farmers' willingness to participate in the management of small-scale irrigation in China from a social capital perspective. Irrigation and Drainage, 67: 594-604. Go to original source...
    16. Mao H., Fu Y., Cao G., Chen S. (2022): Contract farming, social trust, and cleaner production behavior: Field evidence from broiler farmers in China. Environal Science and Pollution Research, 29: 4690-4709. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Meinzen-Dick R., Digregorio M., Mccarthy N. (2004): Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agricultural Systems, 82: 197-214. Go to original source...
    18. Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. (1993): Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1320-1350. Go to original source...
    19. Robbins B.G. (2016): What is trust? A multidisciplinary review, critique, and synthesis. Sociology Compass, 10: 972-986. Go to original source...
    20. Sheng X., Zhang Z., Gao H., Gong D. (2018): Optimization of incentive contracts leading enterprises to participate in low-carbon agricultural development. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 17: 237-244. Go to original source...
    21. Shi X.P., Chen S.J., Ma X.L., Lan J. (2018): Heterogeneity in interventions in village committee and farmland circulation: Intermediary versus regulatory effects. Land Use Policy, 74: 291-300. Go to original source...
    22. Su Y., Huang Q., Meng Q., Zang L., Xiao H. (2023): Socialized farmland operation - An institutional interpretation of farmland scale management. Sustainability, 15: 3818. Go to original source...
    23. Tao R., Yang D.L., Li M., Lu X. (2014): How does political trust affect social trust? An analysis of survey data from rural China using an instrumental variables approach. International Political Science Review, 35: 237-253. Go to original source...
    24. Wang W.J., Zhao X.Y., Li H., Zhang Q. (2021): Will social capital affect farmers' choices of climate change adaptation strategies? Evidences from rural households in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 83: 127-137. Go to original source...
    25. Williamson O.E. (2007): The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. In: Boersch C., Elschen R. (eds): Das Summa Summarum des Management. Wiesbaden, Gabler Verlag: 61-75. Go to original source...
    26. Xiao J., Song Y., You H. (2020): Explaining peasants' intention and behavior of farmland trusteeship in China: Implications for sustainable agricultural production. Sustainability, 12: 5748. Go to original source...
    27. Zhang B.B., Niu W.H., Ma L.Y., Zuo X.Y., Kong X.B., Chen H.B., Zhang Y.F., Chen W., Zhao M.J., Xia X.L. (2019): A company-dominated pattern of land consolidation to solve land fragmentation problem and its effectiveness evaluation: A case study in a hilly region of Guangxi autonomous region, southwest China. Land Use Policy, 88: 104115. Go to original source...
    28. Zhang C.X., Liu W.D., Luo Y.L. (2011): Current situation, problems and reflections on sustainable development and utilization of land resources in China. In: Zhou M. (ed): Advances in Education and Management. International Symposium ISAEBD 2011, Dalian, China, Aug 6-7, 2011: 99-107. Go to original source...
    29. Zhang X., Zhang L., Nie T. (2023): Study on the impact of social capital on farmers' decision-making behavior of adopting trusteeship services. Sustainability, 15: 5343. Go to original source...
    30. Zhou X., Xie Y. (2019): Market transition, industrialization, and social mobility trends in postrevolution China. American Journal of Sociology, 6: 1810-1847. Go to original source...
    31. Zhou Z., Zhang K., Wu H., Liu C., Yu Z. (2023): Land transfer or trusteeship: Can agricultural production socialization services promote grain scale management? Land, 12: 797. Go to original source...
    32. Wenjun Z. (2023): Circulation expectations, farmer trust, and farmers' contract choice behavior. Land, 12: 1588. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content