Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(9):404-414 | DOI: 10.17221/377/2018-AGRICECON

Consumer purchasing behaviour for "biodiversity-friendly" vegetable products: increasing importance of informal relationshipsOriginal Paper

Vera Teresa Foti1, Alessandro Scuderi1, Giuseppe Stella2, Giuseppe Timpanaro*,1
1 Department of Agricultural Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Italy
2 PH3DRA Laboratories University of Catania & INFN, Italy

The consumer's central role within biodiversity conservation networks may be connected to the process of reconnecting models of production and proven local consumption within "alternative food networks" that have the ability to conserve biodiversity and create sustainable production. This research focuses of the indirect relationships between consumers of biodiversity-friendly vegetable crops surveyed at the main farmers' markets in Sicily, revealing details of purchasing behaviour and the factors related to product choice using social network analysis (SNA) to analyse the social relationships. The research highlights the consumer preferences for local produce or areas with an identity connection or an ethical-social affinity, as shown by the convergence of themes such as "territorial promotion" and "Sicilian quality". This result confirms the role of low-volume producers and local communities in protecting biodiversity-friendly farming and renewing their importance in policy-making. Different consumers highlighted how important it is to design more effective measures to maintain and increase ecosystem resilience. Future development in this area will need to include empirical research on defining the motivations that induce consumers to collaborate with producers in the co-creation of values and anticipating the willingness of consumers to be more pro-active and participatory with biodiversity-friendly farmers in managing their relationships.

Keywords: consumption; food; origin; social network analysis; sustainability

Published: September 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Foti VT, Scuderi A, Stella G, Timpanaro G. Consumer purchasing behaviour for "biodiversity-friendly" vegetable products: increasing importance of informal relationships. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(9):404-414. doi: 10.17221/377/2018-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bellia C., Aderno C., Allegra V. (2015): Economic sustainability of a niche supply chain: The case of maletto strawberry. Quality - Access to Success, 16: 47-55.
    2. Borgatti S.P., Li X. (2009): On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Spring. Go to original source...
    3. Brunori G., Rossi A., Guidi F. (2012): On the new social relations around and beyond food. Analysing consumers' role and action in Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity Purchasing Groups). Sociologia Ruralis, 52: 1-30. Go to original source...
    4. Brunori G., Di Iacovo F. (2014): Urban food security and landscape change: A demand-side approach. Landscape Research, 39: 141-157. Go to original source...
    5. Cicia G., Del Giudice T., Scarpa R. (2002): Consumers' perception of quality in organic food. British Food Journal, 104: 200-213. Go to original source...
    6. Chiffoleau Y., Touzard J.M. (2014): Understanding local agrifood systems through advice network analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, 31: 19-32. Go to original source...
    7. Codeluppi V. (2011): Il mito del consum-attore. Cultura e Comunicazione, 2: 12-18. (Italian)
    8. Escobar A. (1998): Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology, 5: 53-82. Go to original source...
    9. European Commission (2013): Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. Agricultural Genetic Resources from Conservation to Sustainable Use. European Commission, Brussels, 28.11.2013 COM, 838.
    10. Fabris G. (2003): Il nuovo consumatore verso il postmoderno. Franco Angeli, Milano. (Italian)
    11. FAO (2013): Sustainability Pathways: Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
    12. Forssell S., Lankoski L. (2015): The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through "alternative" characteristics. Agriculture and Human Values, 32: 63-75. Go to original source...
    13. Frese L., Bjorn G.K., Branca F., Ford-Lloyd B.V., Germeier C.U., Iriondo J.M., Negri V. (2012): Genetic reserve conservation of European crop wild relative and landrace diversity. Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Securing the Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces, 1.
    14. Fiut I.S., Urbaniak M. (2019): Education in defence of biodiversity. Will the ecological and ethical footprint counteract environmental changes? Edukacja wobronie bioró¿norodno¶ci. Czy ¶lad ekologiczno-etyczny zrównowa¿y zmiany ¶rodowiskowe? Problemy Ekorozwoju, 14: 73-78.
    15. Foti V.T., Scuderi A., Stella G. (2016): The study of indirect relationships among the consumers of products of the Buffalo Chain. Quality - Access to Success, 17: 205.
    16. Freeman R.E. (1984): Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
    17. Glamann J., Hanspach J., Abson D.J., Collier N., Fischer J. (2015): The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review. Regional Environmental Change, 17: 1303-1313. Go to original source...
    18. Gruère G., Nagarajan L., Oliver King E.D.I. (2009): The role of collective action in the marketing of underutilized plant species: Lessons from a case study on minor millets in South India. Food Policy, 34: 39-45. Go to original source...
    19. Hand M.S., Martinez S. (2010): "Just what does local mean?" Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm and Resources Issues, 25.
    20. Johns T., Powell B., Maundu P., Eyzaguirre P.B. (2013): Agricultural biodiversity as a link between traditional food systems and contemporary development, social integrity and ecological health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93: 3433-3442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Kontoleon A., Pascual U., Swanson T. (2007): Biodiversity Economics. Cambridge University Press.
    22. Michelsen J., Søgaard V. (2001): Policy Instruments for Promoting Conversion to Organic Farming and Their Effects in Europe 1985-97. University of Southern, Denmark.
    23. Migliore G., Schifani G., Romeo P., Hashem S., Cembalo L. (2015): Are farmers in alternative food networks social entrepreneurs? Evidence from a behavioral approach. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28: 885-902. Go to original source...
    24. Morace F. (2008): Consum-Autori. Le generazioni come imprese creative. Libri Scheiwiller, Milano. (Italian)
    25. Moreno J.L. (1951): Sociometry, Experimental Method and the Science of Society. An Approach to a New Political Orientation. Beacon House, New York.
    26. Morris C., Kirwan J. (2010): Food commodities, geographical knowledges and the reconnection of production and consumption: a case of naturally embedded food products. Geoforum, 41: 131-143. Go to original source...
    27. Ostergaard P., Jantzen C. (2000): Shifting perspectives in consumer research: from buyer behavior to consumption studies, 2000. In: Codeluppi V.: Tra produzione e consumo. Processi di cambiamento della società italiana. Franco Angeli, Milano, 2004: 19-20. (Italian)
    28. Pinna S. (2016): Alternative Food Networks, agro-biodiversity and landscape protection: lessons from two rural parks. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3: 455-462. Go to original source...
    29. Prell C., Hubacek K., Reed M. (2009): Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 22: 501-518. Go to original source...
    30. Roininen K., Arvola A., Lähteenmäki L. (2006): Exploring consumers' perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference, 17: 20-30. Go to original source...
    31. Sage C. (2003): Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative 'good food' networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 19: 47-60. Go to original source...
    32. Salpeteur M., Calvet-Mir L., Diaz-Reviriego I., ReyesGarcía V. (2017): Networking the environment: social network analysis in environmental management and local ecological knowledge studies. Ecology and Society, 22: 41. Go to original source...
    33. Skouloudis A., Malesios C., Dimitrakopoulos P.G. (2019): Corporate biodiversity accounting and reporting in mega-diverse countries: An examination of indicators disclosed in sustainability reports. Ecological Indicators, 98: 888-901. Go to original source...
    34. Scuderi A., Sturiale L., Bellia C., Foti V.T., Timpanaro G. (2016): The redefinition of the role of agricultural areas in the city of Catania. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita. (Italian)
    35. Scuderi A., Timpanaro G., Cacciola S. (2014): Development policies for social farming in the EU-2020 strategy. Calitatea, 15 (S1).
    36. Scott J. (2017): Social Network Analysis. 4th Ed. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, London.
    37. Siebert R., Toogood M., Knierim A. (2006): Factors affecting european farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46: 318-340. Go to original source...
    38. Schaffner D., Demarmels S., Juettner U. (2015): Promoting biodiversity: do consumers prefer feelings, facts, advice or appeals? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32: 266-277. Go to original source...
    39. Simoncini R. (2015): Introducing territorial and historical contexts and critical thresholds in the analysis of conservation of agro-biodiversity by alternative food networks, in Tuscany, Italy. Land Use Policy, 42: 355-366. Go to original source...
    40. Timpanaro G., Di Vita G., Foti V.T., Branca F. (2013): Landraces in Sicilian peri-urban horticulture: A participatory approach to Brassica production system. Acta Horticulturae, 1005: 213-220. Go to original source...
    41. Timpanaro G., Scuderi A., Foti V.T. (2016): A network for the conservation of agrobiodiversity of local ecotypes. Acta Horticulturae, 1142: 163-170. Go to original source...
    42. Willis K.J., Bhagwat S.A. (2009): Biodiversity and climate change. Science, 5954: 806-807. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. Zonino M.R. (2006): Il consumAttore. Cleup, Padova. (Italian)

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content