Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(2):74-88 | DOI: 10.17221/260/2016-AGRICECON

Assessment of the operational and environmental efficiency of agriculture in Latin America and the CaribbeanOriginal Paper

Juan-Javier MORENO-MORENO*, Francisco VELASCO MORENTE, Maria Teresa SANZ DIAZ
Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

Governments in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) require information that can be used to strengthen environmental agricultural strategies. However, in LAC there is not enough comparative analysis regarding operational performance and environmental performance, which are particularly important for sustainable agriculture. The objective of this study is the measurement of operational, environmental and unified (operational and environmental) efficiency through data envelopment analysis (DEA) for an environmental assessment in the agricultural sectors of eighteen LAC countries. The DEA in this study evaluates each country based on six variables: capital stock, labour, land, consumption of fertilizers, value of the gross agricultural production and agricultural emissions (CO2eq). This empirical study finds that six LAC countries attained full efficiency in terms of the three efficiency measurements. Three countries exhibit the highest level of unified efficiency, but show some level of inefficiency in the other two measurements (operational and environmental efficiency). In contrast, nine countries failed to achieve the maximum unified efficiency score.

Keywords: agricultural performance, DEA, returns to scale, damages to scale, unified efficiency

Published: February 28, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MORENO-MORENO J, VELASCO MORENTE F, SANZ DIAZ MT. Assessment of the operational and environmental efficiency of agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(2):74-88. doi: 10.17221/260/2016-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bharati P., Fulginiti L. (2007): Institutions and agricultural productivity in Mercosur. In: Teixeira E.C., Braga M.J. (eds): Institutions and Economic Developmet, Vicosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, October.
    2. CAF (Development Bank of Latin America) (2013): Climate change adaptation program. Available at http://publicaciones.caf.com/media/37041/cambio-climatico.pdf (accessed Nov, 2016).
    3. Cichelková E. (2011): Climate change in the context of global environmental governance possibilities. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 57: 436-448. Go to original source...
    4. Cooper W.W., Park K.S., Pastor J.T. (1999): RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11: 5-42. Go to original source...
    5. Dios-Palomares R., Alcaide D., Pérrez J.D., Bello M.J., Prieto A., Zúniga C.A. (2014): The environmental efficiency using data envelopment analysis: Empirical methods and evidences. Ibero-American programme for science, technolog y and de velopment IberoAmerican network of bioeconomics and climate change, Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262181442_42_The_Environmental_Efficiency_using_Data_Envelopment_Analysis_Empirical_methods_and_evidences (accessed Sept, 2016).
    6. Ebata A. (2011): Agricultural productivity growth in Central America and the Caribbean. [Master Thesis on the Sciences of Agricultural Economy.] University of Nebraska, Lincoln-Nebraska, USA.
    7. ECLAC, FAO, IICA (2013): The outlook for agriculture and rural development in the Americas: A perspective on Latin America and the Caribbean 2014. Available at http://www.fao.org/americas/recursos/perspectivas/ en/ (accessed May, 2016).
    8. ECLAC, FAO, IICA (2015): The outlook for agriculture and rural development in the Americas: A perspective on Latin America and the Caribbean 2015-2016. Available at http://www.iica.int/sites/default/files/publications/files/2015/b3696i.pdf (accessed May, 2016).
    9. FAO (2014): FAO statistical yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/ai3592e.pdf (accessed Nov, 2016).
    10. FAOSTAT (2016): Free access data base about the development indexes of countries around the world: 2012. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ (accessed Feb, 2017).
    11. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.K., Pasurka C. (1989): Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71: 90-98. Go to original source...
    12. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.K., Yaisawarng S. (1993): Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75: 374-380. Go to original source...
    13. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Tyteca D. (1996): An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms-application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18: 161-175. Go to original source...
    14. Hayami Y., Ruttan V.W. (1985) [1971]: Agricultural development: An international perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
    15. IICA (Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura - Inter-American Institute of Cooperation for Agriculture) (2015): Efficient use of energy in agricultural food chains: systematization of indicators and case studies on energy efficiency. Available at http://www.iica.int/sites/default/files/publications/files/2016/B3876e.pdf (accessed Nov, 2016).
    16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006): Eggleston S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T, Tanabe K. (eds): 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan.
    17. IPCC (2014): Edenhofer O., Pichs-Madruga R., Sokona Y., Farahani E., Kadner S., Seyboth K., Adler A., Baum I., Brunner S., Eickemeier P., Kriemann B., Savolainen J., Schlömer S., von Stechow C., Zwickel T., Minx J.C. (eds): Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA.
    18. Kuo H.F., Chen H.L., Tsou K.W. (2014): Analysis of farming environmental efficiency using a DEA model with undesirable outputs. APCBEE Procedia, 10: 154-158. Go to original source...
    19. Ludena C.E. (2010): Agricultural productivity growth, efficiency change and technical progress in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank, IDB working paper series No.186, Washington D.C. Go to original source...
    20. Martín-Retortillo M., Pinilla V., Velazco J., Willebald H. (2014): The growth of the Latin American agricultural production: A comparative analysis of its causes in the second half of the twentieth century. Document presented at the XI International Congress of the AEHE, Colegio Universitario Nacional de Estudios Financieros (CUNEF) (National College of Financial Studies), Madrid, Spain, Sept, 2014.
    21. McCarthy N. (2014): Climate-smart agriculture in Latin America: Drawing on research to incorporate technologies to adapt to climate change. Inter-American Development Bank, IDB Technical Note No. 622, Washington D.C. Go to original source...
    22. Montoya Suarez O., Soto Mejia J. (2010): Estimating the technical efficiency of the economies of the coffeeproducing departments of Colombia by using the linear programming method of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Scientia et Technica, 17: 348-353.
    23. Nin-Pratt A., Falconi C., Ludena C.E., Martel P. (2015): Productivity and the performance of agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean: from the lost decade to the commodity boom. Inter-American Development Bank, Working Paper No. 608 (IDB-WP-608), Washington D.C.
    24. Pfeiffer L.M. (2003): Agricultural productivity growth in the Andean Community. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85: 1335-1341. Go to original source...
    25. PRB (Population Reference Bureau) (2014): World population data sheet. Available at http://www.prb.org/pdf14/2014-world-population-data-sheet_spanish.pdf (accessed April, 2016).
    26. Sánchez L., Reyes O. (2015). Measures of adaptation and mitigation to climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile. Available at http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/39781/S1501265_es.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed December, 2016).
    27. Scheel H. (2001): Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European journal of operational research, 132: 400-410. Go to original source...
    28. Solazzo R., Donati M., Tomasi L., Artini F. (2016): How effective is greening policy in reducing GHG emissions from agriculture? Evidence from Italy. Science of The Total Environment, 573: 1115-1124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Solís D., Bravo-Ureta B.E., Quiroga R.E. (2009): Technical efficiency among peasant farmers participating in natural resource management programmes in Central America. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60: 202-219. Go to original source...
    30. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. (2011a): Measurement of returns to scale and damages to scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs? European Journal of Operational Research, 211: 76-89. Go to original source...
    31. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. (2011b): Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 210: 684-693. Go to original source...
    32. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. (2013): Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of US clean air act on coal-fired power plants. Omega, 41: 164-175. Go to original source...
    33. Trindade F.J., Fulginiti L.E. (2015): Is there a slowdown in agricultural productivity growth in South America? Agricultural Economics, 46: 69-81. Go to original source...
    34. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2014): The millennium development goals report. Available at http://www.undp.org/spanish/mdg/basics.shtml (accessed Apr, 2016).
    35. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2012): Growing greenhouse gas emissions due to meat production. Available at http://www.unep.org/pdf/unepgeas_oct_2012.pdf (accessed Nov, 2016).
    36. United Nations (2017): World Economic Situation and Prospects 2017. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York, USA. Available at http://bit.ly/WESP (accessed May, 2017).
    37. World Bank (2016): Agriculture, value added (of GDP) in 2012. Free access data base about the development indexes of every country in the world. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed May, 2016).
    38. World Bank, CIAT, CATIE (2014): Climate-smart agriculture country profiles: Latin America and the Caribbean. Available at https://ccafs.cgiar.org/publications/climatesmart-agriculture-country-profiles-latin-america-andcaribbean (accessed Nov, 2016).
    39. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. (2008): A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189: 1-18. Go to original source...
    40. Zúniga González C.A. (2011): Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: A Malmquist index analysis of 14 countries 1979-2008. Researching Center for Agrarian Sciences and Applied Economic (RCASAE), National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon (UNANLeon), Working paper. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/114036 (accessed May, 2016).

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content