Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2015, 61(5):222-233 | DOI: 10.17221/190/2014-AGRICECON

Overcoming the legacy of the past? Analyzing the modes of governance used by the Polish agricultural producer groupsOriginal Paper

Volker BECKMANN1, Ilona M. OTTO2,3, Rong TAN2
1 Faculty of Law and Economics, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
2 School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
3 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

The cooperative movement in Poland has a long but difficult history, which has caused farmers to have an aversion to cooperatives. Nonetheless, in the early 1990s, the first farmers' cooperative marketing organizations, which were called agricultural producer groups, appeared in the market. These groups are bottom-up, voluntary organizations the primary purpose of which is to jointly sell their members' output. In this paper, it is investigated why the new forms of governance, namely cooperative arrangements, were chosen, and we evaluate the implications of these choices on the market success of these groups. Empirical data were collected from 62 producer groups in one Polish province. We found that the groups were typically functioning as associations, unions, and limited liability companies. The factors that had an impact on the choices made were the number of members and the specific investment per member. Additionally, if the initial investment level was low, not only set-up and operational costs but also tax considerations played a role in the decision. Therefore, we argue that the new bottom-up cooperatives, which are theoretically suitable when the start-up capital is high or the number of members is large, will gradually be recognized and accepted in the market despite the fact that these cooperatives have a "bad reputation" caused by the socialist legacy. The new cooperative development trend confirms this argument.

Keywords: co-operatives, governance, organizational choice, Poland, socialist legacy

Published: May 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BECKMANN V, OTTO IM, TAN R. Overcoming the legacy of the past? Analyzing the modes of governance used by the Polish agricultural producer groups. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2015;61(5):222-233. doi: 10.17221/190/2014-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Banaszak I. (2008a): Agricultural producer groups in Poland: Empirical survey results. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 36: 73-85.
    2. Banaszak I. (2008b): Determinants of successful cooperation in agricultural markets: evidence from producer groups in Poland. In: Hendrikse G., Cliquet G., TuunanenM., Windsperger J. (eds): Strategy and Governance of Networks. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. Go to original source...
    3. Banaszak I. (2008c): Success and Failure of Cooperation in Agricultural Markets. Evidence from producer groups in Poland. Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources, Shaker, Aachen. Go to original source...
    4. Beckmann V. (2000): Transaktionskosten und institutionelle Wahl in der Landwirtschaft: Zwischen Markt, Hierarchie und Kooperation. (Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice in Agriculture: Between market, Hierarchy and Co-operation). Edition Sigma, Berlin.
    5. Bijman J., Iliopoulos C. (2014): Farmers' cooperatives in the EU: policies, strategies, and organization. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85: 497-508. Go to original source...
    6. Brodziński M.G. (1999): Stan i perspektywy rozwojowe spółdzielczości w Polsce. (The current status and development perspectives of cooperatives in Poland.) Praktyczne Vademecum Spółdzielczości, Nr. 5, Wydawnictwo SIB.
    7. Boguta W. (2006): Organizacja i funkcjonowanie grup producentów rolnych. (The organization and functioning of agricultural producer groups.) Krajowa Rada Spółdzielcza, Warszawa.
    8. Borys B., Jemison D.B. (1989): Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Journal, 14: 234-249. Go to original source...
    9. Chloupkova J., Svendsen G.L.H., Svendsen G.T. (2003): Building and destroying social capital: The case of cooperative movements in Denmark and Poland. Agricultural and Human Values, 20: 241-252. Go to original source...
    10. Ejsmont J., Milewski R. (2005): Podstawy prawne tworzenia i dzialalności grup producentów. (Legal basis for forming and functioning of producer groups.) Fundacja Wspomagania Wsi, Warszawa. Available at http://www.witrynawiejska.org.pl/images/15208_grprod.pdf (accessed 30.03.07).
    11. Hagedorn K. (2014): Post-socialist farmers' cooperatives in Central and Eastern Europe. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85: 555-577. Go to original source...
    12. Hanehan B.M., Anderson B.L. (2001): Considering Cooperation: A Guide for New Cooperative Development. Department of Applied Economics and Management, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca.
    13. Katz J.P., Boland M.A. (2002): One for all and all for one? A new generation of co-operatives emerges. Long Range Planning, 35: 73-89. Go to original source...
    14. Lemanowicz M. (2005): Organizacje i Grupy Producentów Szansą na Poprawę Konkurencyjności Polskiego Rolnictwa. (Producer organizations and groups as a chance for improving the competitiveness in Polish agriculture.) Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa.
    15. Małysz J. (1996): Procesy integracyjne w agrobiznesie. (Integration process in agribusiness.) Wydawnictwo Centrum Doradztwa I Edukacji w Rolnictwie w Poznaniu, Poznan.
    16. Matczak P. (2012): Support for Farmers' Cooperatives; Country Report Poland. Wageningen UR, Wageningen. Available at http://edepot.wur.nl/244810 (accessed 30.12.2014).
    17. Ménard C. (2004): The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160: 345-376. Go to original source...
    18. Ménard C. (2005): a new institutional approach to organization. In: Ménard C., Shirley M. (eds): Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Dordrecht: 281-318. Go to original source...
    19. Ménard C., Klein P.G. (2004): Organizational issues in the agrifood sector: Toward a comparative approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86: 750-755. Go to original source...
    20. UMWW (2014): List of producer groups registered in Wielkpolska. Urzad Marszalkowski Wojewodztwa Wielkopolskiego. Available at http://www.bip.umww.pl/portal?id=59400 (acceseed 30.12.2014).
    21. Verhaegen I., Van Huylenbroeck G. (2002): Hybrid Govenance Structures for Quality Farm Products. Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources, Vol. 6., Shaker, Aachen.
    22. Williamson O.E. (1991): Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296. Go to original source...
    23. Zarudzki R., Przepióra A., Futymski A. (2000): Poradnik lidera grupy producentów rolnych. (A handbook of a producer group leader.) Agrolinia, Poznan.
    24. Ziegenhorn R. (1999): Networking the Farm. The Social Structure of Cooperation and Competition in Iowa Agriculture. Asgate, Aldershot.
    25. Legislation
    26. Act from 7th April 1989, Prawo o stowarzyszeniach. (The law on associations.) Dz.U. z 1989, Nr. 20, poz. 104 z póź. zm.
    27. Act from 15th September 2000, Ustawa o grupach producentów rolnych i ich związkach oraz o zmianie innych ustaw wraz z kolejnymi zmianami. (Bill on producer groups, their associations and on changing previous bills and their amendmends.) Dz.U. 2000, Nr. 88, poz. 983.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content