Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(9):396-402 | DOI: 10.17221/21/2013-AGRICECON

Evaluation of the agrarian businesses results according to their legal formOriginal Paper

Peter ADAMIŠIN1, Rastislav KOTULIČ2
1 Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Management, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovak Republic
2 Department of Economic Sciences and Economy, Faculty of Management, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovak Republic

The entry into the new market environment after 1990 marked the beginning of complicated structural, economic and social changes for agricultural companies that brought a measurable improvement in only few aspects of the technical performance and competitiveness. New forms of enterprise were created, the number of subjects increased and their average concentration decreased. Based on the analysis, it is claimed that in the majority of selected economic indicators, there was a significant difference in the reached parameters among the groups of the analyse subjects using land, differentiated according to their legal status. Based on the results of testing, it is possible to claim that business companies show a higher extent of economic success evaluated through the selected economic indicators. Only in one case - the indicator of the amount of subsidies per 1 ha of agricultural land - it is impossible to establish a statistically significant difference. This impossibility in that particular indicator only shows even more notably the fact that business companies are able to manage better than cooperatives even with subsidies per hectare of agricultural land that have not been statistically significantly different.

Keywords: agricultural cooperative, business company, economic performance, paired t-test

Published: September 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ADAMIŠIN P, KOTULIČ R. Evaluation of the agrarian businesses results according to their legal form. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2013;59(9):396-402. doi: 10.17221/21/2013-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adamišin P., Torma S. (2002): Analýza konkurencieschopnosti slovenského poľnohospodárstva. (The analysis of the competitiveness of Slovak agriculture.) In: Teoretické aspekty prierezových ekonomík. Zborník vedeckých prác. Royal Unicorn, Košice, pp. 1-6; ISBN 80-968128-9-0.
    2. Andrejovsk ý P., Duše cinová A. (2006): Ekologické poľnohospodárstvo a bioprodukcia. (The ecological agriculture and the bioproduction.) In: Ekologické poľnohospodárstvo ako súčasť agroenvironmentálneho programu. Zborník vedeckých prác z vedeckého seminára s medzinárodnou účasťou. SPU, Nitra, pp. 11-15; ISBN 80-8069-719-1.
    3. Bielik P., Rajcaniova M. (2004): Competitiveness analysis of agricultural enterprises in Slovakia. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 50: 556-560. Go to original source...
    4. Deininger K. (1995): Collective agricultural production: a solution for transition economies? World Development, 23: 1317-1334. Go to original source...
    5. Grznár M., Szabo Ľ., Jankelová N. (2009): The agrarian sector of the Slovak Republic after the entry to the European Union. Ekonomický časopis, 57: 903-917.
    6. Hečková J., Chapčáková A. (2010): Future of European agricultural in context of global economic and regional environmental scenarios. In: Analýza základných ekonomických faktorov a ich využitie pri reštrukturalizácii poľnohospodárstva a zabezpečení trvaloudržateľného rozvoja Slovenska. Zborník vedeckých prác z vedeckého seminára. PU, Prešov, 16. november 2010, pp. 34-48; ISBN 978-80-555-0294-6.
    7. Holman R. (2002): Mikroekonomie: Stredne pokročilý kurz. (Microeconomics: Intermediate Course.) 1st ed. C.H. Beck, Praha; ISBN 80-7179-737-5.
    8. Hudáková M. (2003): Ekonomické a ekologické aspekty rozvoja poľnohospodárskej výroby na Slovensku. (The economic and environmental aspects of the agricultural production development in Slovakia.) In: Stav poľnohospodárstva v predvstupovom období do Európskej únie. Zborník referátov a diskusných príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie s medzinárodnou účasťou Odboru Ekonomiky a manažmentu Slovenskej akadémie poľnohospodárskych vied. SPU, Nitra, pp. 17-21; ISBN 80-968665-8-3.
    9. Huttmanová E. (2005): Konvenčné a ekologické poľnohospodárstvo, ich špecifiká a význam pre trvalo udržateľný rozvoj. (Conventional and organic agriculture, their specifics and importance for sustainable development.) In: Manažment a ekonomika ekologickej poľnohospodárskej výroby. Zborník príspevkov z medzinárodného vedeckého seminára. SPU, Nitra, pp. 65-68; ISBN 808069-565-2.
    10. Chrastinová Z. (2008): Economic differentiation in Slovak agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 536-545. Go to original source...
    11. Kotulič R., Pavelková J. (2012): Prosperita a produktivita subjektov hospodáriacich na pôde v Slovenskej republike na prelome druhého tisícročia: Analytický pohľad na efektívne riadenie zdrojov pre zabezpečenie finančného zdravia podniku. (The prosperity and productivity entities working on the land in the Slovak Republic at the turn of the second millennium: The analytical view of the effective management of the resources to ensure the financial health of the company.) 1st ed. PU, Prešov; ISBN 978-80555-0574-9.
    12. Matejkova E., Qineti A., Serences R. (2008): Macroeconomic aspects of the development of Slovak regions in the post-accession period. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 367-375. Go to original source...
    13. Mathijs E. (2002): Microecnomic Analysis of farm restructuring in East and Middle Europe. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 48: 104-109. Go to original source...
    14. Monke E., Avillez F., Pearson S. (1998): Small Farm Agriculture in Southern Europe (CAP Reform and Structural Change). Ashgate, Aldershot; ISBN 1-84014-162X.
    15. Naščáková J., Hudák J. (2004): Ekonomické výsledky podnikania na poľnohospodárskej pôde v Slovenskej republike. (The economic results of business on agricultural land in Slovakia.) In: Regióny, vidiek, životné prostredie. Medzinárodná vedecká konferencia, SPU, Nitra, pp. 1-6; ISBN 80-8069-438-9.
    16. Pokrivcak J., Crombez C., Swinnen J.F.M. (2006): The status quo bias and reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: impact of voting rules, the European Commission and external changes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33: 562-590. Go to original source...
    17. Rosochatecká E., Tomšík K., Žídková D. (2008): Selected problems of capital assets of Czech agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 108-116. Go to original source...
    18. Sojková Z., Kropková Z., Benda V. (2008): Slovak agricultural farms in different regions - comparison of efficiency. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 158-165. Go to original source...
    19. Střeleček F., Lososová J., Zdeněk R. (2011): Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2009. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 103-117. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content