Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2012, 58(10):454-466 | DOI: 10.17221/76/2012-AGRICECON

Regional environmental governance: the NAFTA case

Eva CIHELKOVÁ
Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic

The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 elaborated the idea of sustainable development. A comprehensive document called the Agenda 21 provided an explanation how to achieve a sustainable economic development. Along the tools presented in the document, there emerged in practice a new regionalism which is based on the preferential trade agreements. Currently, regional agreements are of a more complex nature, so that they may include environmental cooperation, too. The aim of this paper is to illustrate, on the case of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a possible approach of regional agreements to environmental cooperation. The paper is divided into four sections. The first one summarizes a general approach to addressing environmental issues within the integration groupings. The second tries to answer the question of whether the NAFTA confirms the general approach to the regional environmental governance. The third deals with the meaning and the failure of the regional governance for the assessment of the cross-border impact of the NAFTA/NAAEC on the environment. The fourth and last section gives an answer to whether the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), as the environmental part of the NAFTA, is a good basis for the effective environmental governance in North America.

Keywords: governance, integration, North American Free Trade Agreement, regionalism

Published: October 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
CIHELKOVÁ E. Regional environmental governance: the NAFTA case. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2012;58(10):454-466. doi: 10.17221/76/2012-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. CEC (2004): Ten Years of North American Environmental Cooperation. Report of the Ten-year Review and Assesment Committee to the Council of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 15. June 2004. Available at http://www.cec.org/Storage/79/7287_TRACReport2004_en.pdf
    2. CEC (2005): Looking to the Future. Strategic Plan of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation 2005-2010. Available at http://www.cec.org/Storage/97/9633_20052010-Strategic-plan_en.pdf
    3. CEC (2009a): About the Commission: CEC Ministerial Statement. Denver, Colorado, 24/6/2009. Available at http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=122&ContentID=1491&Site
    4. CEC (2009b): Propsal to Examine the Governance of the CEC and the Implementation of the NAAEC. Governance Propsal Final. Available at http://www.cec.org/Storage/101/10004_Governance_Proposal_May_2010_final2e.pdf
    5. CEC (2009c): Strategic Plan of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation 2010-2015. Final draft - 29. July 2010. Available at http://www.cec.org/Storage/58/10115_Strategic_plan_2011_en.pdf
    6. Cihelková E. (2004): Nový regionalismus: teorie a projevy ve světové ekonomice. (New regionalism: Theory and trends in the world economy.) Politická ekonomie, 52: 807-822. Go to original source...
    7. Cosbey A., Tay S., Lim H., Walls M. (2004): The Rush to Regionalism: Sustainable Development and Regional/ Bilateral Approaches to Trade and Investment Liberalization. A Scoping Paper prepared for the International Research Centre, Canada. Available at http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=670 (modified May 15, 2010).
    8. Craik N. (2007): Transboundary Envirionmental Assesment in North America and Opportunities. Paper presented at AALS Annual Meeting, January 3-6, 2007 Washington, D.C., pp. 1-27. Available at http://www.aals.org/am2007/thursday/craik.pdf
    9. EC (1992): A Community Strategy for "Sustainable Mobility". Green Paper on the Impact of Transport on the Environment, COM (92) 46 final, 20 February 1992. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/1235/
    10. Gallagher K., Ackerman F., Ney L. (2002): Economic Analysis in Environmental Reviews of Trade Agreements: Assessing the North American Experience. Working Paper, No. 02-01, pp. 1-33. Available at http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/publications/working_papers/02-01SustAssessments.pdf Go to original source...
    11. Gar ver G., Podhora A. (2008): Transboundar y environmental impact assessment as part of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26: 253- 263. Available at https://portfolio.du.edu/portfolio/getportfoliofile?uid=149130 Go to original source...
    12. Government of Singapure (2003): Korea-Singapore Free Trade Agreement: Point Study Report. Available at http://www.fta.gov.sg/fta/pdf/FTA_KSFTA_JSG_Report.pdf
    13. JPAC (2010): The Joint Public Advisory Committee of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America. Available at http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=17599&AA_SiteLanguageID=1
    14. NAAEC (1993): North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation between the Government of Canada, the Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the United States of America. Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Available at http://www.cec.org/pubs_info_resources/law_treat_agree/naaec/download/Naaec-e.doc (accessed April 2008).
    15. NAFTA (1993): North American Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA Secretariat. Available at http://www.naftasec-alena.org/en/view.aspx?conID=590&mtpiID=ALL (modified June 18, 2012).
    16. Salzman J. (2002): Executive Order 13,141 and the Environmental Review of Trade Agreements. 95 American Journal of International Law, 366 (2001). Go to original source...
    17. Sanchez R.A. (2002): Governance, trade and the enviroment in the context of NAFTA. American Behavioral Scientist, 45: 1369-1393. Go to original source...
    18. SPP (2005): Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. Report to Leaders (27 June 2005). Available at http://www.spp.gov/report_to_leaders (accessed May 2008).
    19. UN (1987): Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations. Available at http://www.un-documents.net/wed-ocf.htm
    20. Vošta M. (2010): Sustainable development of rural areas of the Czech Republic in the context of instruments European Union. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 20: 20-35. Go to original source...
    21. WTO (2003): General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Geneva: World Trade Organization. Available at http://docsonline.wto.org/gen_browseDetail.asp? preprog=3

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content