Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2011, 57(6):259-271 | DOI: 10.17221/4/2011-AGRICECON

Rural development in the context of agricultural "green" subsidies: Czech farmers' responses

Miloslav LAPKA1, Eva CUDLÍNOVÁ1, J. Sanford RIKOON2, Martin PĚLUCHA1, Viktor KVETOŇ3
1 Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 Department of Rural Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA
3 Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

The study compares the role of agricultural green subsidies in rural development of the Czech Republic before and after joining the European Union (EU) in 2004. We use the perspective of multifunctional agriculture and contribute to the research on the contemporary trends in Czech agriculture by using the data collected through surveys in 2000 and 2006, as well as 2008 comparative statistical support, to ask if there have been significant changes and improvements in farmers' evaluations of these programs. The empirical case study results show some positive changes connected with the participation in the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). In spite of improvements, farmers continue to cite two primary weaknesses and constraints - administrative procedures and shifting program guidelines - that were evident prior to joining the EU. It can be assumed that the environmental subsidies in the Horizontal Rural Development Plan 2004-2006 have had an effect on the stabilization of the livelihoods of rural inhabitants. In general, there is a positive shift of valuation of the CAP among farmers in the Czech Republic.

Keywords: green subsidies, Czech farmers, multifunctional agriculture, European Union

Published: June 30, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
LAPKA M, CUDLÍNOVÁ E, RIKOON JS, PĚLUCHA M, KVETOŇ V. Rural development in the context of agricultural "green" subsidies: Czech farmers' responses. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2011;57(6):259-271. doi: 10.17221/4/2011-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Babie E. (1995): The Practice of Social Sampling. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
    2. Bailey K.D. (1992): Methods of Social Research. Free Press. New York, NY.
    3. Baldwin R., Wyplosz Ch. (2008): Ekonomie evropské integrace (Economics of the European Integration). Grada Publishing, Corp.; ISBN 978-80-247-1807-1.
    4. Brožová I. (2010): Economic profit of ecological farmers in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 243-248. Go to original source...
    5. Bureau J.Ch. (2002): Enlargement and reform of the EU Common Agricultural Policy - impacts on the western hemisphere countries. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington D.C., December 21, 2002.
    6. CSO (2008): Vybrané socioekonomické ukazatele České republiky (Selected socioeconomic indicators of the Czech Republic). Statistical data provided by the Czech Statistical Office in 2008.
    7. Čechura L. (2010): Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 183-191. Go to original source...
    8. Darnhofer I. (2005): Organic farming and rural development: Some evidence from Austria. Sociologia Ruralis, 45: 308-317. Go to original source...
    9. DG-AGRI (2008): Rural Development in the European Union - Statistical and Economic Information - Report 2008. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, EU, December 2008.
    10. Dwyer J., Ward N., Lowe P., Baldock D. (2007): European rural development under the Common Agricultural Policy's "second pillar": institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies, 41.7: 873-887, October 2007. Go to original source...
    11. Glenna L. (1996): Rationality, habitus, and agricultural landscapes: ethnographic case studies in landscape sociology. Agriculture and Human Values, 13: 21-38. Go to original source...
    12. Heinze R.G., Voelzkow H. (1993): Organizational problems for the German Farmers Association and alternative policy options. Sociologia Ruralis, 33: 25-41. Go to original source...
    13. Kraft S.E. (1989): Is there a place for ethnomethodology in the analysis of agricultural public policy - the case for the environment. In.: Second Biennial Conference of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society, Little Rock, AK, November 1989.
    14. Lapka M.,Rikoon J.S., Cudlínová E. (1999): Private farmers and contemporary conservation subsidy programs in the Czech Republic: Farmers opinions and programs implications and Water Conservation Policies and Programs. In: Napier T. L., Napier S. M., Tvrdon J. (eds.): Successes and Failures. CRC Press (USA), Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, D.C., Chapter 31, pp. 457-491.
    15. Lošťák M., Hudečková H. (2010): Preliminary impacts of LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 249-265. Go to original source...
    16. Marsden T., Banks J., Bristow G. (2002): The social management of rural nature: understanding agrarian-based rural development. Environment and Planning A, 34: 809-825. Go to original source...
    17. Mahé P.L., Ortalo-Magné F. (1999): Five proposals for a European model of the countryside. Economic Policy, 14: 81-131. Go to original source...
    18. Matoušková K. (2006): Národní strategický plán rozvoje venkova ČR na období 2007-2013 (National strategic plan for the rural development on the 2007-2013). Zpravodaj Agrobase (Agrobase Bulletin), Nov. 28, 2006: 15-17.
    19. Milbourne P. (2003): Nature-society-rurality: making critical connections. Sociologia Ruralis, 43: 193-195. Go to original source...
    20. Montresor E. (2008): Cohesion policies and rural development policies at regional level in the enlarged EU. RSA Annual International Conference, Prague 27 th -29 th May 2008. In: Hardy S., Larsen L.B., Freeland F. (eds.): Regions: The Dilemmas of Integration and Competition. Regional Studies Association, Seaford; ISBN 9781-897721-33-9.
    21. O'Connel, P.F. (1992): Sustainable agriculture - a valid alternative. Outlook on Agriculture, 21: 5-12 Go to original source...
    22. OECD (2001): Multifunctionality - Towards an Analytical Framework. OECD publications, Paris; ISBN 92-6418625-5. Go to original source...
    23. Ostrander S. (1984): Women in the Upper Cla.ss Temple University Press, Philadephia, PA.
    24. Pelucha M. (2009): The rural development policy in the framework of the EU CAP: critical analysis of the territorial cohesion in the CR. [Dissertation Thesis.] Department of Regional Studies, University of Economics, Prague.
    25. Redfield R. (1960): The little Community. Peasant Society and Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
    26. Rikoon J.S. (1988): Threshing in the Midwest 1820-1940. A Study of traditional Culture and technological Change. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN, pp. 154-163.
    27. Rikoon J.S., Constance D.H., Galetta S. (1996): Factors affecting farmers' use and rejection of banded pesticide applications. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 51: 322-334. Go to original source...
    28. SAIF (2008): Data for all payments within the HRDP 2004- 2006, data were collected by the SAIF - State Agricultural Intervention Fund which is an intermediate body of the Czech Ministry of Agriculture. Data were used in the ex-post evaluation of the HRDP in 2009.
    29. Shucksmith M., Thompson K.J., Roberts D. (eds.) (2005): The CAP and the Regions - the Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK; ISBN 0-85199-055-X. Go to original source...
    30. Tamáš V. (2010): Problém duální struktury zemědělských podniků v evropských tranzitivních ekonomikách. (Problem of the dual structure of farms in European transition economies). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58: 571-578. Go to original source...
    31. Tangermann S. (2006): The Future of the CAP under WTO Reform Pressure. In.: Vision of a Long-Term Agricultural and Rural Development in EU. Prague, May 2006.
    32. Thompson P.B. (1995): The Spirit of the Soil. Agriculture and Environmental Ethics. Routlege, London, New York, NY.
    33. Toledo M.V. (1990): The ecological rationality of peasant production. In.: Altieri M.E., Hecht S.H. (eds): Agroecology and Small Farm Development. University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
    34. Vaughn G.F. (1992): Ecology, economy and ethics. Economic policy outlook. Delaware Agriculture Natural Resources, 2: 1-4.
    35. Viktorová D., Pělucha M. (2005): Uplatnění a evaluace předvstupní pomoci EU ve venkovských oblastech České republiky v kontextu vývoje zemědělské a venkovské politiky v Evropě (Applicated and evaluation of the EU pre-accession support in rural areas of the Czech Republic in the context of the agricultural and rural development policy in Europe). Foundation "Nadace Josefa, Marie a Zdeňky Hlávkových", Economic institute of Josef Hlávka, October 2005.
    36. Wilson G.A. (2007): Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK; ISBN 978 1 84593 256 5. Go to original source...
    37. Wossink G.A.A., de Koeijer T.J., Renkema J.A. (1992): Environmental-economic policy assessment: a farm economic approach. Agricultural Systems, 39: 421-438. Go to original source...
    38. Zagata L. (2010): How organic farmers view their own practice: results from the Czech Republic. Agriculture and Human Values, 27: 277-290. Go to original source...
    39. Zpravodaj Agrobase (2006): Bulletin Agrobase of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (in Czech). November 18, 2006, pp. 7-9.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content