Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2006, 52(12):560-573 | DOI: 10.17221/5066-AGRICECON

Comparison of the simplified system of direct payments with the system applied by the EU-15

F. Střeleček, J. Lososová, R. Zdeněk
University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

The simplified system of direct payments in 2005 is being compared in this contribution with the standard direct payments (a system applied in the EU-15) and with the system applied in 2004. Production and economic indicators exploited in this analysis were provided by the agricultural enterprises for the period 2003-2005. For the selected file of enterprises there were calculated the claims for subsidies according to various systems of direct payments administration and the volume of direct payments was recounted per ha of agricultural land. The enterprises were divided according to the LFA proportion in the total area of farmed land. The analysis was realized due to the means and in the frame of the project NAZV QG 60042.

Keywords: standard direct payments, simplified payments, SAPS, Top-up

Published: December 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Střeleček F, Lososová J, Zdeněk R. Comparison of the simplified system of direct payments with the system applied by the EU-15. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2006;52(12):560-573. doi: 10.17221/5066-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Čermáková A., Střeleček F. (1995): Statistika I. Jihočeská univerzita, Zemědělská fakulta, České Budějovice; ISBN 80-7040-126-5.
  2. Council Regulation (EC) No 1251/1999 of 17 May 1999 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops.
  3. Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organization of the market on beef and veal.
  4. Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk production.
  5. Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations. 1999 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the Common Agricultural Policy.
  6. National Farm Business Reform: the final compromise of the chairmen and the Committee, EU Council, Luxembourgh 2003.
  7. Netrda P. (2006): Čím budou podmíněny platby zemědělcům od r. 2009? Eurokurýr, (5): 11. MZe ČR.
  8. MZe ČR (2003): Zásady, kterými se stanovují podmínky pro poskytování dotací na základě § 2 odst.1 písm.a) bod 11 zákona č. 252/1997 Sb., o zemědělství - dosažení úrovně přímých plateb do zemědělství stanovené smlouvou o přistoupení České republiky k Evropské unii pro rok 2004, 30. 12. 2003, www.mze.cz
  9. MZe ČR (2005): Zemědělství 2004, 23. 8. 2005, www. mze.cz
  10. Střeleček F., Lososová J. (2003): Impact of Common Agricultural Policy on Czech Agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 49 (11): 497-514. Go to original source...
  11. Střeleček F., Lososová J., Kollar P. (2003): Influence of subsidies on the economic result of agricultural firms in production and marginal areas. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 49 (6): 251-260. Go to original source...
  12. Střeleček F., Lososová J. (2005): Economic impact of several variants of additional direct payments for 2005 and 2006 years on the Czech economy. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 51 (3): 93-111. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.