Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2005, 51(1):27-31 | DOI: 10.17221/5072-AGRICECON

Methodological aspects of the Czech rural areas research after the EU accession

V. Majerová
Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic

Czech countryside and agriculture entered a new phase of development in May 2004. The transformation period after 1989 has changed the employment conditions of rural population as well as the conditions of economic subjects functioning in the rural space considerably. Its multifunctional character is now shifting from the sphere of theoretical thinking to the expected reality of the nearest years. The fact that the necessary economic prerequisites and their social impacts are closely tied together stresses the necessity of forming such tools of following and evaluating of the rural development criteria which would be able to reflect in a relevant way important indicators of the positive and negative changes in the working and living conditions of the population. The contribution issues from the experience of empirical research and reflects its future orientation, methodological approaches and possibilities.

Keywords: Czech countryside, European context, methodology

Published: January 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Majerová V. Methodological aspects of the Czech rural areas research after the EU accession. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2005;51(1):27-31. doi: 10.17221/5072-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Charitonová V. (1975): Některé otázky vztahu sociografie k sociální a kulturní problematice venkova (Doctoral thesis). Praha.
    2. Gillette J. M. (1928): Sociologie venkova. Nákladem Ústředního svazu agrárních akademiků, Praha.
    3. Hudečková H., Lošťák M. (1995): Sociologie venkova I (textbook). ČZU, Praha.
    4. Knickel K., Renting H. (2000): Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40: 512-528. Go to original source...
    5. Křenek F. (1969): Sociologie zemědělského podniku. Institut pro vzdělávání pracovníků v zemědělství a výživě, Praha.
    6. Lom F. (1969): Vědeckotechnická revoluce v zemědělství. Historie a sociologie zemědělství. I.díl, Socialistická akademie, Praha.
    7. Ploeg van der J.D. (2000): Revitalizing Agriculture: Farming Economically as Starting Ground for Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40: 497-511. Go to original source...
    8. Ploeg van der J.D., Renting H. (2000): Impact and Potential: A Comparative Review of European Rural Development Practices. Sociologia Ruralis, 40: 530-543. Go to original source...
    9. Ploeg van der J.D., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Manion J., Marsden T., Roest de K., SevillaGuzmán E., Ventura F. (2000): Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40: 391-408. Go to original source...
    10. Shanin T., Nikulin A., Danilov V. (2002): Refleksivnoje krestjanovedenije. Desjatiletije issledovanij selskoj Rosii. Moskva, MVŠSEN, ROSSPEN; ISBN 5-93725-012-5; ISBN 5-8243-0346-0.
    11. Sociologia Ruralis (1996-2002).
    12. Tauber J. (1969): Specifické důsledky vědecko-technické revolu ce v zemědělství a její společenské důsledky. Historie a sociologie zemědělství, Volume 1, Socialistická akademie, Praha.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content