Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2004, 50(1):20-28 | DOI: 10.17221/5162-AGRICECON

Strategies for the future eGovernment

J. Millard, J. Havlíček, I. Tichá, J. Hron
1 Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark
2 Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper provides some of the interim results of the Fifth Framework PRISMA project dealing with the of impact ICT on government and citizen services in Europe. The analysis and the concept description of long-term strategies for eGovernment and a long-term vision over 10 years for eGovernment are described. Activities performed by the government are analysed from the demand ("front office") and supply ("back office") point of view. Recommendations for long-term strategic decisions are based on three scenarios of the future European development till 2010: (1) "Prosperous and just Europe", (2) "Turbulent world", (3) "Recession and reorientation".

Keywords: e-Government, ICT, long-term strategies, scenarios of the future development

Published: January 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Millard J, Havlíček J, Tichá I, Hron J. Strategies for the future eGovernment. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2004;50(1):20-28. doi: 10.17221/5162-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bent S., Kernaghan K., Marson B.D. (1999): Innovations and Good Practices in Single-Window Service. Canadian Centre for Management Development.
    2. Castells M. (1996): The rise of the network society. Vol. 1, Malden, Massachusetts, USA; Oxford, UK, Backwell Publishers.
    3. Electronic Signature. Law No 227/2000; 366/2001, 304/2001.
    4. Federal Benchmarking Consortium (19987): Serving the American Public. Best Practices in One-Stop Customer Service. www.npr.gov/library/papers/benchmrk/onestp.hrinl. Washington, D.C., NPR.
    5. Frissen P. (1997): The virtual state. Postmodernisation, informatisation and public administration. Loader B.D. (ed.): The Governance of Cyberspace. Routledge, London/New York: 111–125. Go to original source...
    6. Havlíèek J. (1996a): Integrating Management Information and Decision Support Systems in Economics in Transition. In: Sborník z konference Mathematical Methods in Economics, VŠE v Praze, Nová Hu: 124–128.
    7. Havlíèek J. (1996b): Data Base Management. In: Proceedings of OECD Conference, Paris, OECD/GD(95), 38: 514–519.
    8. Havlíèek J. (1996c): Statement of Agricultural Statistics and Data Management in Czech Republic. In: Proceedings of OECD Conference, Paris, OECD/GD(95) 38: 93–99.
    9. Hron J., Tichá I. (1999): The Virtual Organization and Its Implications for Agricultural Businesses, Wydz. E i OGŽ, Szczecin: 105–120; ISBN 85-85847-27-8.
    10. Intergovernmental Advisory Board (1998): Foundations for Successful Intergovernmental Management. Federal, State, and Local Government Experiences. Washington, D.C.
    11. Lips M., Frissen P. (1997): Wiring Government. Integrated public service delivery through ICT. ITeR Nr. 8. Alphen aan den Rijn/Diegem, Samson BedrijfsInformatie bv: 67– 164.
    12. Naschold F. (1996): New Frontiers in Public Sector Management. Trends and Issues in State and Loca! Government in Europe. Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
    13. National Census 1999 (2000). Czech National Statistical Office.
    14. OECD (2001). Engaging Citizens in Policy-making: Information, Consultation and Public Participation. PUMA Policy Brief No. 10 http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00007000/M00007815.pdf.
    15. Office of Intergovernmental Solutions (1999). Integrated Service Delivery: Governments Using Technology to Serve the Citizen International, Federal, State, and Local Government Experiences. Washington, D.C., GSA.
    16. Per cent of all, Statistical Annual, Census 2001.
    17. PRISMA (2002a). Pan-European changes and trends in service delivery, deliverable D2.2 of Prisma, a research action supported by the Information Society Technologies Programme of the European Union, 2000–2003.
    18. PRISMA (2002b): Pan-European best practice in service delivery, deliverable D3.2 of Prisma, a research action supported by the Information Society Technologies Programme of the European Union, 2000–2003.
    19. Seidle F.L. (1995): Rethinking the delivery of public services to citizens. Montreal, Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP).
    20. Sofres Factum – Bureau for Public Opinion, 2001.
    21. Taylor J. et al. (1996): Innovation in Public Service Delivery. Information and Communication Technologies, hrsg. von William H. Button. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 265– 268. Go to original source...
    22. Tichá I. (1997a): Koncept uèící se organizace a informaèní technologie. In: Souèasný management – sborník, VŠB-TU Ostrava: 207–210; ISBN 80-7078-454-7.
    23. Tichá I. (1997b): Virtuální organizace a její aplikace. In: MVD´97 Nitra, VŠP Nitra, 4 s.
    24. Tichá I. (1997c): Virtuální organizace a možnosti jejího využití. Zemìdìlská ekonomika, Praha, 43 (10): 463–465.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content