Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2002, 48(6):259-262 | DOI: 10.17221/5314-AGRICECON

Countryside, tourism development and national heritage revitalisation

T. Hájek
Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, Czech Committee for UNESCO, Prague, Czech Republic

The society has deepened its reflection on the future of the Czech countryside - not only in connection with the multi-functional agriculture but mainly with regard to the actor of service. It seems that this reflection went relatively far especially in the tourism industry where an understanding of a need for complex legislation defining the tourism industry as a long-term interest of the whole society (especially in connection with regional development) was reached. Since in the Czech countryside, national heritage monuments constitute both the key attraction and the axis of the inhabitant structure, tertiarization of the countryside cannot take place without strengthening of the revival strategies with regard to the national heritage monuments. However, among the heritage protectors themselves, no reflection in this sense has yet taken place.

Keywords: countryside, tourism, revival of national heritage monuments, tertiary sphere

Published: June 30, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hájek T. Countryside, tourism development and national heritage revitalisation. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2002;48(6):259-262. doi: 10.17221/5314-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Eichstadt-Bohlig, Vollmer A. (2001): Grüne Initiative zur Stärkung des Denkmalschutzes. Eckpunkpapier, lang≻hlûssig.
    2. Feøtek T. (2001): Venkov je mrtev, a žije venkov! Reflex, (16): 38-44, Praha.
    3. International Cultural Tourism Charter, Mexico 1999 (2001). Mezinárodní dokumenty ICOMOS o ochranì kulturního dìdictví (International ICOMOS documents on the protection of cultural heritage), Èeský národní komitét ICOMOS, Praha, 38 s.
    4. Hájek T., Jech K. (2000): Téma pro 21. Století Kulturní krajina aneb proè ji chránit. Ministerstvo životního prostøedí, Praha, 203 s.; ISBN 80-7212-134-0.
    5. Hrabánková M. (1999): Strukturální fondy. Institut výchovy a vzdìlávání Ministerstva zemìdìlství, Praha, ISBN 807105-182-9.
    6. Pacáková-Hošálková B. et al. (1999): Zahrady a parky v Èechách, na Moravì a Slezsku. Libri Publishing, 466 s.; ISBN 80-85983-55-9.
    7. Pásková M., Matoušková A., Hájek T. (2001): Výsledky pøedbìžného prùzkumu úrovnì øízení cestovního ruchu na úrovni obcí. COT Business, December.
    8. Pásková M., Petržílek P., Hájek T. (2001): Dùvodová zpráva Zákona o podpoøe trvale udržitelného rozvoje cestovního ruchu na území obcí (a o zmìnì nìkterých zákonù). COT Business, September, Praha.
    9. Power of place The future of historic environment (2000): Power of Place Office 23 Saville Row, London W1S2ET. www.mmr.cz

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content