Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2025, 71(6):285-297 | DOI: 10.17221/369/2024-AGRICECON

Structural characteristics and determinants of the patent collaboration network in China's agricultural sectorOriginal Paper

Xiao Cheng1,2
1 Institute of Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle Construction, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, P.R. China
2 School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, P.R. China

Drawing upon data on co-signed patents in China's agricultural sector between 2015 and 2022, this paper explores the structural characteristics and determinants of the patent collaboration network in agricultural technology involving universities (U), enterprises (E) and research institutes (R). The results of social network analysis (SNA) revealed that the patent collaboration network is expanding in scale, but innovators are sparsely connected to others. Although the subnetwork linked by enterprises is the largest, universities and research institutes are more likely to play roles as hubs and bridges in the network. Furthermore, quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) regression revealed that prior collaboration experience and geographical proximity are key factors that promote co-patenting in the agricultural sector. Compared with U–U partnerships, E–E and E–R partnerships are associated with decreased patent collaboration. In the agriculture and forestry industries, the U–U and U–R partnerships are most likely involved in co-patenting, followed by the R–R and U–E partnerships. In the animal husbandry and fishery industries, no significant difference was found between the partnerships of U–U, R–R, U–E and U–R in their collaborative propensity.

Keywords: patents; collaborative innovation; agriculture; proximity; social network analysis

Received: September 30, 2024; Revised: March 5, 2025; Accepted: March 31, 2025; Prepublished online: June 25, 2025; Published: June 27, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cheng X. Structural characteristics and determinants of the patent collaboration network in China's agricultural sector. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2025;71(6):285-297. doi: 10.17221/369/2024-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson S.W., Cheng M.M., Phua Y.S. (2022): Influence of control precision and prior collaboration experience on trust and cooperation in inter-organizational relationships. The Accounting Review, 97: 1-22. Go to original source...
  2. Boschma R. (2005): Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39: 61-74. Go to original source...
  3. Capaldo A. (2007): Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 585-608. Go to original source...
  4. Choe H., Lee D.H. (2017): The structure and change of the research collaboration network in Korea (2000-2011): Network analysis of joint patents. Scientometrics, 111: 917-939. Go to original source...
  5. Di Guardo M.C., Harrigan K.R. (2016): Shaping the path to inventive activity: The role of past experience in R&D alliances. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41: 250-269. Go to original source...
  6. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2024): FAOSTAT. Available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/ (accessed June 8, 2024).
  7. Gyamfi S., Gerstlberger W., Prokop V., Stejskal J. (2024): A new perspective for European SMEs' innovative support analysis: Does non-financial support matter? Heliyon, 10: 23796. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hansen T. (2015): Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 49: 1672-1684. Go to original source...
  9. Hu F., Qiu L., Xiang Y., Wei S., Sun H., Hu H., Weng X., Mao L., Zeng M. (2023): Spatial network and driving factors of low-carbon patent applications in China from a public health perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 11: 1121860. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Hu S., Fu Z. (2023): Analysis of factors influencing the formation of agricultural science and technology collaborative innovation network: Empirical evidence from ERGM. In: International Symposium on Knowledge and Systems Sciences. Singapore, 2023: 230-245. Go to original source...
  11. Katz J.S., Kawai S. (1997): What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1-18. Go to original source...
  12. Kharazmi O.A., Dartoomi S. (2023): A systematic literature review on collaborative innovation in the public sector. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 36: 602-630. Go to original source...
  13. Li E., Yao F., Xi J., Guo C. (2018): Evolution characteristics of government-industry-university-research cooperative innovation network for China's agriculture and influencing factors: Illustrated according to agricultural patent case. Chinese Geographical Science, 28: 137-152. Go to original source...
  14. Li Y., Zhang Y., Lee C.C., Li J. (2021): Structural characteristics and determinants of an international green technological collaboration network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324: 129258. Go to original source...
  15. Liu W., Li F., Bi K. (2022): Exploring and visualizing co-patent networks in bioenergy field: A perspective from inventor, transnational inventor, and country. International Journal of Green Energy, 19: 562-575. Go to original source...
  16. Lo J.Y., Li H. (2018): In the eyes of the beholder: The effect of participant diversity on perceived merits of collaborative innovations. Research Policy, 47: 1229-1242. Go to original source...
  17. Ma H. (2023): The dynamics of China's collaborative innovation network in agricultural biotechnology: A spatial-topological perspective. Systems, 11: 73-91. Go to original source...
  18. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS) (2024): National data. Available at https://data.stats.gov.cn/ (accessed June 8, 2024). (in Chinese)
  19. Melin G., Persson O. (1996): Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36: 363-377. Go to original source...
  20. Murgia G. (2021): The impact of collaboration diversity and joint experience on the reiteration of university co-patents. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46: 1108-1143. Go to original source...
  21. Petruzzelli A.M. (2011): The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31: 309-319. Go to original source...
  22. Schiavone F., Simoni M. (2016): Prior experience and co-opetition in R&D programs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7: 819-835. Go to original source...
  23. Shin S., Park M.S., Lee H., Baral H. (2022): The structure and pattern of global partnerships in the REDD+ mechanism. Forest Policy and Economics, 135: 102640. Go to original source...
  24. Tey Y.S., Brindal M., Wong S.Y., et al. (2024): Evolution of precision agricultural technologies: A patent network analysis. Precision Agriculture, 25: 376-395. Go to original source...
  25. Van Beers C., Zand F. (2014): R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31: 292-312. Go to original source...
  26. Vivona R., Demircioglu M.A., Audretsch D.B. (2023): The costs of collaborative innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48: 873-899. Go to original source...
  27. Wang K. (2022): Analysis of characteristics of cooperation network of smart agriculture technology companies: China as an example. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4: 1-4. Go to original source...
  28. Wang W., Jian L., Lei Y., Liu J., Wang W. (2023): Measurement and prediction of the relationships among the patent cooperation network, knowledge network and transfer network of the energy storage industry in China. Journal of Energy Storage, 67: 107467. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.