Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2025, 71(4):173-184 | DOI: 10.17221/296/2023-AGRICECON

Effect of agricultural socialisation services on green grain production efficiency: Evidence from Jiangsu Province, ChinaOriginal Paper

Yue-Dong Zhang1, Jing-Jing Li2, Yi-Fang Zheng3, Jia-Xian Xu3
1 School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China
2 School of Economics and Management, Yango University, Fuzhou, P.R. China
3 School of Public Administration and Law, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, P.R. China

In this study, we examine the effect of Agricultural Socialisation Services (ASS) on green grain production efficiency in Jiangsu Province, China, by using data from the China Land Economy Survey. We used the generalised random forests model in this research to address potential issues of farming household self-selection into ASS and unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects. The results show that participation in ASS significantly improves green production efficiency, particularly for small-scale farmers. Efficiency gains are most pronounced in critical agronomic operations such as pest control, seeding and planting, whereas smaller efficiency effects are observed in plowing, harvesting and straw treatment. The findings suggest that targeted expansion of ASS could substantially enhance sustainable farming practices, especially for resource-constrained farms. This study provides important policy insights for promoting agricultural sustainability through improved access to and delivery of agricultural services, contributing to more efficient and ecofriendly grain production.

Keywords: generalised random forests; small-scale farmers; sustainable farming practises

Received: September 6, 2023; Revised: February 5, 2025; Accepted: February 13, 2025; Prepublished online: April 11, 2025; Published: April 30, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zhang Y, Li J, Zheng Y, Xu J. Effect of agricultural socialisation services on green grain production efficiency: Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2025;71(4):173-184. doi: 10.17221/296/2023-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Athey S., Tibshirani J., Wager S. (2019): Generalised random forests. The Annals of Statistics, 47: 1148-1178. Go to original source...
  2. Cai B., Shi F., Meseretchanie A., Betelhemabraham G., Zeng R. (2024): Agricultural socialised services empowering smallholder rice producers to achieve high technical efficiency: empirical evidence from southern China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8: 1329872. Go to original source...
  3. Cao H., Zhu X., Heijman W., Zhao K. (2020): The impact of land transfer and farmers' knowledge of farmland protection policy on pro-environmental agricultural practices: The case of straw return to fields in Ningxia, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277: 123701. Go to original source...
  4. Chen B., Dennis E., Featherstone A. (2022): Weather impacts the agricultural production efficiency of wheat: The importance of precipitation Shocks, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47: 544-562.
  5. Chen L., Zhang Z., Li H., Zhang X. (2023): Maintenance skill training gives agricultural socialised service providers more advantages. Agriculture, 13: 135. Go to original source...
  6. Chen Z., Tang C., Liu B., Liu P., Zhang X. (2022a): Can socialised services reduce agricultural carbon emissions in the context of appropriate scale land management? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 1039760. Go to original source...
  7. Chen Y. (2020): Land outsourcing and labour contracting: Labour management in China's capitalist farms. Journal of Agrarian Change, 20: 238-254. Go to original source...
  8. Dey B., Ahmed R., Ferdous J., Haque M., Khatun R., Hasan E., Uddin N. (2023): Automated plant species identification from the stomata images using deep neural network: A study of selected mangrove and freshwater swamp forest tree species of Bangladesh. Ecological Informatics, 75: 102128. Go to original source...
  9. Dinar A., Karagiannis G., Tzouvelekas V. (2007): Evaluating the impact of agricultural extension on farms' performance in Crete: A nonneutral stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural Economics, 36: 135-146. Go to original source...
  10. Dong Y., Mu Y. (2019): Empirical evidence of path selection and efficiency enhancement mechanism of farmers' environment-friendly technology adoption. China Rural Observation, 2: 34-48.
  11. Du R., Khan A., Shi R., Shen Y., Zhao M. (2024): Impact of production outsourcing on the adoption of low-carbon agricultural technologies in China. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 70: 187-197. Go to original source...
  12. Fried H., Lovell C., Schmidt S., Yaisawarng S. (2002): Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17: 157-174. Go to original source...
  13. Hayami Y., Ruttan V. (1985): Agricultural development: An international perspective. The Johns Hopkins Press. London. 60-61.
  14. Hu Y., Li B., Zhang Z., Wang J. (2022): Farm size and agricultural technology progress: Evidence from China. Journal of Rural Studies, 93: 417-429. Go to original source...
  15. Kannan E. (2013): Does decentralisation improve agricultural services delivery? Evidence from Karnataka. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26: 199-208.
  16. Klepacka A., Florkowski W., Revoredo C. (2019): The expansion and changing cropping pattern of rapeseed production and biodiesel manufacturing in Poland. Renewable energy, 133: 156-165. Go to original source...
  17. Liu S., Mourifie I., Wan Y. (2020): Two-way exclusion restrictions in models with heterogeneous treatment effects. Econometrics Journal, 23: 345-362. Go to original source...
  18. Liu Y., Zou L., Wang Y. (2020): Spatial-temporal characteristicsand influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China in recent 40 years. Land Use Policy, 97: 104794. Go to original source...
  19. Liu T., Wu G. (2022): Does agricultural cooperative membership help reduce the overuse of chemical fertilisers and pesticides? Evidence from rural China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29: 7972-7983. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Lu H., Chen Y., Hu H., Geng H. (2021): Can agricultural socialised services promote the adoption of environmentally friendly agricultural technologies by farmers? Agricultural Technology Economy, 3: 36-49.
  21. Lyne M., Jonas N., Ortmann G. (2018): A quantitative assessment of an outsourced agricultural extension service in the Umzimkhulu District of KwaZuluNatal, South Africa. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 24: 51-64. Go to original source...
  22. Ma W., Abdulai A., Goetz R. (2018): Agricultural cooperatives and investment in organic soil amendments and chemical fertiliser in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100: 502-520. Go to original source...
  23. Mi Q., Li X., Gao J. (2020): How to improve the welfare of smallholders through agricultural production outsourcing: Evidence from cotton farmers in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120636. Go to original source...
  24. Mumtaz B., Gopal T. (2018): The effect of agricultural extension services: Date farmers' case in balochistan, Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17: 282-289. Go to original source...
  25. Nanjing Agricultural University (2020-2022): China Land Economic Survey (CLES). Available at https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/iCaXckMJGnbqRO3NAYJBTw (accessed Apr 7, 2025)
  26. Nie X., Wager S. (2021): Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects. Biometrika, 108: 299-319. Go to original source...
  27. Sun D., Rickaille M., Xu Z. (2018): Determinants and impacts of outsourcing pest and disease management: Evidence from China's rice production. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10: 443-461. Go to original source...
  28. Taylor M., Bhasme S. (2018): Model farmers, extension networks and the politics of agricultural knowledge transfer. Journal of Rural Studies, 64: 1-10. Go to original source...
  29. Tian Y., Zhang J., He Y. (2014): Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and driving factor of agricultural carbon emissions in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13: 1393-1403. Go to original source...
  30. Tone K. (2001): A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130: 498-509. Go to original source...
  31. Tone K. (2002): A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143: 32-41. Go to original source...
  32. Tang L., Liu Q., Yang W., Wang J. (2018): Do agricultural services contribute to cost saving: Evidence from Chinese rice farmers. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10: 323-337. Go to original source...
  33. Ugwoke B. (2013): Promoting Nigerian agriculture through library and information services. International Journal of Information Management, 33: 564-566. Go to original source...
  34. Wang Y., Han X. (2020): Agricultural productive service system based on the block chain and edge computing. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 4: 1-9. Go to original source...
  35. Xia H., Li C., Zhou D., Zhang Y., Xu J. (2020): Peasant households' land use decision-making analysis using social network analysis: A case of Tantou Village, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 80: 452-468. Go to original source...
  36. Yao W., Zhu Y., Liu S., Zhang Y. (2024): Can agricultural socialised services promote agricultural green total factor productivity? From the perspective of production factor allocation. Sustainability, 16: 8425. Go to original source...
  37. Zhao Q., Bao H., Zhang Z.(2021): Off-farm employment and agricultural land use efficiency in China. Land Use Policy, 101: 105097. Go to original source...
  38. Zhu M. (2011): Analysis of changes in farmers' grain marketing behaviour in major grain-producing areas. Economy and Management, 15: 10-13.
  39. Zheng X., Lin Q. (2021): The impact of production outsourcing service development on rural labour off-farm allocation - based on the perspective of farm household heterogeneity and link heterogeneity. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 6: 101-114.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.