Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2024, 70(12):577-590 | DOI: 10.17221/125/2024-AGRICECON
Impact assessment of climate change at farm level: A methodological approach based on integrated biophysical and economic modelsOriginal Paper
- 1 Bioeconomy Cluster, Nitra, Slovakia
- 2 Institute of Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
- 3 Pan-European University, Bratislava, Slovakia
- 4 Department of Economics and Social Sciences (WiSo), BOKU University, Vienna, Austria
- 5 Agriculture, Forestry, and Ecosystem Services Research Group Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
- 6 National Agricultural and Food Centre – Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
- 7 Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Transport and Bioenergetics, Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
The dominant agricultural sector in Slovakia is crop production, with the majority of arable land dedicated to cultivating cereals (57%), followed by fodder crops (20%) and industrial crops (19%). Slovakia has technical and biophysical potential for expanding biomass production. However, it is crucial to identify optimal production practices, alternative costs, and environmental outputs. Farms become more vulnerable to the worldwide threat posed by climate change. Based on research, farmers can effectively mitigate the adverse effects of climate change by making necessary adjustments to their current farming techniques. Thus, by using an advanced tool like integrated farm models, farmers can evaluate and manage a range of risks related to their activities. This paper aims to present the application of integrated modelling frameworks at the farm level and propose a framework for studying the consequences of climate change through a scenario-based approach at the farm level. Integrated assessments provide new insights that complement those derived from more detailed assessments. Based on the model developed, the results of two research questions are provided. Since, from the viewpoint of the farmer, risk and unpredictability associated with lower yields are frequently the main causes of lower income, spatially explicit integrated modelling is applied, enabling economic optimisation of crop production on a selected farm with a focus on maximising net returns while considering biophysical parameters. The modelling results depict the distribution of selected crops on arable land and the most suitable management practices for crop production in terms of nitrogen application and irrigation utilisation. Additionally, we develop an integrated model proposing the estimation of the risk of yield variability and nitrogen emissions for three climate change scenarios for the simulated period of 2020–2100 on the model farm. In response to the problems posed by climate change, this integrated approach can assist evidence-based decision-making and sustainable agriculture practices.
Keywords: climate change scenarios; crop production management; farm model; integrated modelling framework
Received: April 8, 2024; Revised: October 24, 2024; Accepted: November 5, 2024; Published: December 23, 2024 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Adger W.N., Brown I., Surminski S. (2018): Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376: 20180106.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Barkley A., Peterson H.H., Shroyer J. (2010): Wheat variety selection to maximize returns and minimize risk: An application of portfolio theory. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 42: 39-55.
Go to original source...
- Bhusal K., Udas E., Bhatta L.D. (2022): Ecosystem-based adaptation for increased agricultural productivity by smallholder farmers in Nepal. PLOS One, 17: e0269586.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bullock J.M., Dhanjal-Adams K.L., Milne A., Oliver T.H., Todman L.C, Whitmore A.P., Pywell R.F. (2017): Resilience and food security: Rethinking an ecological concept. Journal of Ecology, 105: 880-884.
Go to original source...
- Bullová T., Bielik P., Adamičková I., Urbánová M., Čeryová D. (2020): Linear programming for land allocation - example of selected crops in Slovakia. In: International Scientific Days 2020, Gödöllö, May 13-15, 2020: 263-270.
- Choruma D.J., Balkovič J., Odume O.N. (2019): Calibration and validation of the EPIC model for maize production in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Agronomy, 9: 494.
Go to original source...
- Cui Z., Gao Y., Yan B., Wu B., Wang Y., Xu P., Wang H., Zhao B., Cao Z., Xie Y., Niu J., Ma J., Yang K. (2021): Water and nitrogen coupling effects on grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency of oilseed flax in semiarid area of China. Available at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-963789/v1 (accessed Feb 18, 2024)
Go to original source...
- Delfiyan F., Yazdanpanah M., Forouzani M., Yaghoubi J. (2021): Farmers' adaptation to drought risk through farm-level decisions: The case of farmers in Dehloran county, Southwest of Iran. Climate and Development, 13: 152-163.
Go to original source...
- Dreschler M., Watzold F. (2001): The importance of economic costs in the development of guidelines for spatial conservation management. Biological Conservation, 97: 51-59.
Go to original source...
- Durham T.C., Mizik T. (2021): Comparative economics of conventional, organic, and alternative agricultural production systems. Economies, 9: 64.
Go to original source...
- Fageria N.K. (2014): Nitrogen harvest index and its association with crop yields. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37: 795-810.
Go to original source...
- FAO (2017): The Future of Food and Agriculture - Trends and Challenges. Rome, FAO: 163.
- Frank S., Witzke H.P., Zimmermann A., Havlík P., Ciaian P. (2014): Climate change impacts on European agriculture: A multi model perspective. In: EAAE 2014 Congress 'Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies', Ljubljana, Aug 26-29, 2014: 15.
- Groot J., Cortez-Arriola J., Rossing W.A., Améndola Massiotti R.D., Tittonell P. (2016): Capturing agroecosystem vulnerability and resilience. Sustainability, 8: 1206.
Go to original source...
- Hasegawa T., Wakatsuki H., Ju H., Vyas S., Nelson G.C., Farrell A., Deryng D., Meza F., Makowski D. (2022): A global dataset for the projected impacts of climate change on four major crops. Scientific Data, 9: 58.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Janssen S., Van Ittersum M.K. (2007): Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bioeconomic farm models. Agricultural Systems, 94: 622-636.
Go to original source...
- Jepsen M.R., Kuemmerle T., Müller D., Erb K., Verburg P.H., Haberl H., Vesterager J.P., Andrič M., Antrop M., Austrheim G., Björn I., Bondeau A., Bürgi M., Bryson J., Caspar G., Cassar L.F., Conrad E., Chromý P., Daugirdas V., Van Eetvelde V., et al. (2015): Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy, 49: 53-64.
Go to original source...
- Jia D., Dai X., Xie Y., He M. (2021): Alternate furrow irrigation improves grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat. Agricultural Water Management, 244: 106606.
Go to original source...
- Kazemi H., Klug H., Kamkar B. (2018): New services and roles of biodiversity in modern agroecosystems: A review. Ecological Indicators, 93: 1126-1135.
Go to original source...
- Khan M., Walker D. (2015): Application of crop growth simulation models in agriculture with special reference to water management planning. International Journal of Core Engineering and Management, 2: 113-130.
- Koondhar M.A., Tan Z., Alam G.M., Khan Z.A., Wang L., Kong R. (2021): Bioenergy consumption, carbon emissions, and agricultural bioeconomic growth: A systematic approach to carbon neutrality in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 296: 113242.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lal R., Negassa W., Lorenz K. (2015): Carbon sequestration in soil. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 15: 79-86.
Go to original source...
- LPIS (2022): Register pôdy. Available at https://portal.vupop.sk/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=32beed691b01498d9ebe11bf8f9b7b04 (accessed Dec 2, 2022; in Slovak)
- Markowitz H. (1952): Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7: 77-91.
Go to original source...
- Markowitz H.M. (1987): Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Oxford, B. Blackwell: 387.
- Matson P.A., Parton W.J., Power A.G., Swift M.J. (1997): Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277: 504-509.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mitter H., Heumesser C., Schmid E. (2015): Spatial modeling of robust crop production portfolios to assess agricultural vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Land Use Policy, 46: 75-90
Go to original source...
- Moss R.H., Edmonds J.A., Hibbard K.A., Manning M.R., Rose S.K., van Vuuren D.P., Carter T.R., Emori S., Kainuma M., Kram T., Meehl G.A., Mitchell J.F.B., Nakicenovic N., Riahi K., Smith S.J., Stouffer R.J., Thomson A.M., Weyant J.P., Wilbanks T.J. (2010): The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463: 747-756.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- OECD (2014): Green Growth Indicators for Agriculture. Paris, OECD Publishing: 98.
Go to original source...
- Olesen J.E., Bindi M. (2002): Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. European Journal of Agronomy, 16: 239-262.
Go to original source...
- Olesen J.E., Trnka M., Kersebaum K.C., Skjelvåg A.O., Seguin B., Peltonen-Sainio P., Rossi F., Kozyra J., Micale F. (2011): Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. European Journal of Agronomy, 34: 96-112.
Go to original source...
- Paas W., Kanellopoulos A., Van de Ven G., Reidsma P. (2016): Integrated impact assessment of climate and socio-economic change on dairy farms in a watershed in the Netherlands. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 78: 35-45.
Go to original source...
- Pretty J. (2008): Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363: 447-465.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rashford B.S., Dugger B.D., Adams R.M. (2008): Application of a bioeconomic production model to improve wildlife management. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72: 510-517.
Go to original source...
- Roberts M., Hawes C., Young M. (2023): Environmental management on agricultural land: Cost benefit analysis of an integrated cropping system for provision of environmental public goods. Journal of Environmental Management, 331: 117306.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Roche M.J., McQuinn K. (2004): Riskier product portfolio under decoupled payments. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31: 111-123.
Go to original source...
- Santhi C., Srinivasan R., Arnold J.G., Williams J.R. (2006): A modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of water quality management plans implemented in a watershed in Texas. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21: 1141-1157.
Go to original source...
- Schuler J., Adelhart Toorop R., Willaume M., Vermue A., Schläfke N., Uthes S., Zander P., Rossing W. (2020): Assessing climate change impacts and adaptation options for farm performance using bio-economic models in Southwestern France. Sustainability, 12: 7528.
Go to original source...
- Simpson N.P., Mach K.J., Constable A., Hess J., Hogarth R., Howden M., Lawrence J., Lempert R.J., Muccione V., Mackey B., New M.G., O'Neill B., Otto F., Pörtner H.O., Reisinger A., Roberts D., Schmidt D.N., Senevirante S., Strongin S., van Aalst M., Totin E., Trisos C.H. (2021): A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth, 4: 489-501.
Go to original source...
- Skaf L., Buonocore E., Dumontet S., Capone R., Franzese P.P. (2019): Food security and sustainable agriculture in Lebanon: An environmental accounting framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209: 1025-1032.
Go to original source...
- Song B., Almatrafi E., Tan X., Luo S., Xiong W., Zhou C., Qin M., Liu Y., Cheng M., Zeng G., Gong J. (2022): Biochar-based agricultural soil management: An application-dependent strategy for contributing to carbon neutrality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 164: 112529.
Go to original source...
- Steidl J., Schuler J., Schubert U., Dietrich O., Zander P. (2015): Expansion of an existing water management model for the analysis of opportunities and impacts of agricultural irrigation under climate change conditions. Water, 7: 6351-6377.
Go to original source...
- Stetter C., Sauer J. (2022): Greenhouse gas emissions and eco-performance at farm level: A parametric approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81: 617-647.
Go to original source...
- Svetlanská T. Turčeková N., Adamičková I., Skalský R. (2017): Food security facets: Case of Slovakia regions. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7: 311-320.
Go to original source...
- Takáč J., Šiška B. (2011): Calibration and validation of DAISY model in conditions of the Slovak Republic (Kalibrácia a validácia modelu DAISY pre podmienky Slovenska). In: Proceedings of Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, No. 33. Bratislava, Výskumný ústav pôdoznalectva a ochrany pôdy: 161-172. (in Slovak)
- Termorshuizen J.W., Opdam P. (2009): Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24: 1037-1052.
Go to original source...
- Zhao Z., Sha Z., Liu Y., Wu S., Zhang H., Li C., Zhao Q., Cao L. (2016): Modeling the impacts of alternative fertilization methods on nitrogen loading in rice production in Shanghai. Science of the Total Environment, 566-567: 1595-1603.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Zscheischler J., Westra S., van den Hurk B.J.J.M., Seneviratne S.I., Ward P.J., Pitman A., AghaKouchak A., Bresch D.N., Leonard M., Wahl T., Zhang X. (2018): Future climate risk from compound events. Nature Climate Change, 8: 469-477.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.