Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2024, 70(10):474-494 | DOI: 10.17221/188/2024-AGRICECON
Driving factors of green production behaviour among farmers of different scales: Evidence from North ChinaOriginal Paper
- 1 School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, P. R. China
The agricultural production in China is gradually transitioning from extensive agriculture to green agriculture. In this context, identifying the driving factors and dimensions of farmers’ green production behaviour can contribute to promoting sustainable agricultural development. Existing studies lack investigation into the identification of driving factors and dimensions of green production behaviour among farmers of different scales. This study examined 1 142 farm households from five major grain-producing provinces in the North China Plain in 2019. We employed probit-ISM (interpretive structural modelling) models to analyse the driving factors of green production behaviour among farmers of different scales and identify dimensional differences. The study concluded the following: i) Personal characteristics, household characteristics, operational characteristics, social network characteristics, organisational characteristics, and cognitive characteristics were factors driving green production behaviour among small-scale farmers. However, social network characteristics and organisational characteristics had insignificant effects on green production behaviour among large-scale farmers. ii) Personal characteristics, number of agricultural workers, scale of operation, degree of land fragmentation, and whether relatives and friends are civil servants were the deep-rooted factors driving farmers’ green production behaviour. Part-time farming status, proportion of grain income, types of agricultural machinery, relationship with local farm machinery operators, and organisational characteristics were middle indirect factors. Cognitive characteristics represented the direct surface factors. This study can provide crucial information for government departments, which formulate differentiated policies to promote green production behaviour among farmers of different scales.
Keywords: farmers’ green production behavior; interpretive structural modelling; large-scale farmers; probit model; small-scale farmers
Received: May 31, 2024; Revised: September 25, 2024; Accepted: September 30, 2024; Prepublished online: October 29, 2024; Published: October 31, 2024 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Adnan N., Nordin S.M., Ali M. (2018): A solution for the sunset industry: Adoption of Green Fertiliser Technology amongst Malaysian paddy farmers. Land Use Policy, 79: 575-584.
Go to original source...
- Adnan N., Nordin S.M., Bahruddin M.A., Tareq A.H. (2019): A state-of-the-art review on facilitating sustainable agriculture through green fertilizer technology adoption: Assessing farmers behavior. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 86: 439-452.
Go to original source...
- Ataei P., Gholamrezai S., Movahedi R., Aliabadi V. (2021): An analysis of farmers' intention to use green pesticides: The application of the extended theory of planned behavior and health belief model. Journal of Rural Studies, 81: 374-384.
Go to original source...
- Cao H., Zhu X., Heijman W., Zhao K. (2020): The impact of land transfer and farmers' knowledge of farmland protection policy on pro-environmental agricultural practices: The case of straw return to fields in Ningxia, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277: 123701.
Go to original source...
- Du S., Luo X., Tang L., Yan A. (2023): The effects of quality certification on agricultural low-carbon production behavior: Evidence from Chinese rice farmers. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21: 2227797.
Go to original source...
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2023): FAOSTAT. Available at https:/www.fao.org/faostat/ (accessed Mar 16, 2023)
- Gao R., Zhang H., Gong C., Wu Z. (2022): The role of farmers' green values in creation of green innovative intention and green technology adoption behavior: Evidence from farmers grain green production. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 980570.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Guo Y., Wang J. (2021): Spatiotemporal changes of chemical fertilizer application and its environmental risks in China from 2000 to 2019. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18: 11911.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Guo H., Sun F., Pan C., Yang B., Li Y. (2021): The deviation of the behaviors of rice farmers from their stated willingness to apply biopesticides - A study carried out in Jilin Province of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18: 6026.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Guo Z., Chen X., Zhang Y. (2022): Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers' agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital. Technology in Society, 71: 102085.
Go to original source...
- Hou D., Wang X. (2023): How does agricultural insurance induce farmers to adopt a green lifestyle? Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1308300.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Li B., Shen Y. (2021): Effects of land transfer quality on the application of organic fertilizer by large-scale farmers in China. Land Use Policy, 100: 105124.
Go to original source...
- Li D., Zhao L., Ma S., Shao S., Zhang L. (2019): What influences an individual's pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146: 28-34.
Go to original source...
- Li J., Feng S., Luo T., Guan Z. (2020a): What drives the adoption of sustainable production technology? Evidence from the large scale farming sector in East China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257: 120611.
Go to original source...
- Li M., Wang J., Zhao P., Chen K., Wu L. (2020b): Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers' perceptions. Science of The Total Environment, 738: 140289.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Li Y., Fan Z., Jiang G., Quan Z. (2021): Addressing the differences in farmers' willingness and behavior regarding developing green agriculture - A case study in Xichuan County, China. Land, 10: 316.
Go to original source...
- Li M., Liu Y., Huang Y., Wu L., Chen K. (2022): Impacts of risk perception and environmental regulation on farmers' sustainable behaviors of agricultural green production in China. Agriculture, 12: 831.
Go to original source...
- Li B. Qiao Y., Yao R. (2023): What promote farmers to adopt green agricultural fertilizers? Evidence from 8 provinces in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 426: 139123.
Go to original source...
- Li W., Qiao D., Hao Q., Ji Y., Chen D., Xu T. (2024): Gap between knowledge and action: Understanding the consistency of farmers' ecological cognition and green production behavior in Hainan Province, China. Environment Development and Sustainability, 2: 1-25.
Go to original source...
- Liu Y., Sun D., Wang H., Wang X., Yu G., Zhao X. (2020): An evaluation of China's agricultural green production: 1978-2017. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243: 118483.
Go to original source...
- Luo L., Qiao D., Zhang R., Luo C., Fu X., Liu Y. (2022): Research on the influence of education of farmers' cooperatives on the adoption of green prevention and control technologies by members: Evidence from rural China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19: 6255.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mao H., Chai Y., Chen S. (2021): Land tenure and green production behavior: Empirical analysis based on fertilizer use by cotton farmers in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18: 4677.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mi Q. Li X. Gao J. (2020): How to improve the welfare of smallholders through agricultural production outsourcing: Evidence from cotton farmers in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120636.
Go to original source...
- Niu Z., Chen C., Gao Y., Wang Y., Chen Y., Zhao K. (2022): Peer effects, attention allocation and farmers' adoption of cleaner production technology: Taking green control techniques as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339: 130700.
Go to original source...
- Pan S., Di C., Chandio A.A., Sargani G.R., Zhang H. (2022): Investigating the impact of grain subsidy policy on farmers' green production behavior: Recent evidence from China. Agriculture, 12: 1191.
Go to original source...
- Qi X., Liang F., Yuan W., Zhang T., Li J. (2021): Factors influencing farmers' adoption of eco-friendly fertilization technology in grain production: An integrated spatial-econometric analysis in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310: 127536.
Go to original source...
- Qiao D., Xu S., Xu T., Hao Q., Zhong Z. (2022): Gap between willingness and behaviors: Understanding the consistency of farmers' green production in Hainan, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19: 11351.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Qing C., Zhou W., Song J., Deng X., Xu D. (2023): Impact of outsourced machinery services on farmers' green production behavior: Evidence from Chinese rice farmers. Journal of Environmental Management, 327: 116843.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ren J., Lei H., Ren H. (2022): Livelihood capital, ecological cognition, and farmers' green production behavior. Sustainability, 14: 16671.
Go to original source...
- Sui Y., Gao Q. (2023): Farmers' endowments, technology perception and green production technology adoption behavior. Sustainability, 15: 7385.
Go to original source...
- Wang X., Ma Y., Li H., Xue C. (2022): How does risk management improve farmers' green production level? Organic fertilizer as an example. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 946855.
Go to original source...
- Wu H., Hao H., Lei H., Ge Y., Shi H., Song Y. (2021): Farm size, risk aversion and overuse of fertilizer: The heterogeneity of large-scale and small-scale wheat farmers in Northern China. Land, 10: 111.
Go to original source...
- Wu Y., Duan X., Liu R., Ma H., Zhang Y. (2024): How does full-cost insurance for wheat affect pesticide use? From the perspective of the differentiation of farmers' production scale. Environmental Research, 242: 117766.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Xu N., Zhao D., Zhang W., Liu M., Zhang H. (2022a): Does digital transformation promote agricultural carbon productivity in China? Land, 11: 1966.
Go to original source...
- Xu Y., Liu H., Lyu J., Xue Y. (2022b): What influences farmers' adoption of soil testing and formulated fertilization technology in black soil areas? An empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19: 15682.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Yan A., Luo X., Tang L., Du S. (2023). The effect of agricultural extension service need-supply fit on biological pesticides adoption behavior: Evidence from Chinese rice farmers. Agriculture, 13: 2074.
Go to original source...
- Yang Y., He Y., Li Z. (2020): Social capital and the use of organic fertilizer: An empirical analysis of Hubei Province in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27: 15211-15222.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Yang C., Liang X., Xue Y.J., Zhang Y.Y., Xue Y.J. (2024): Can government regulation weak the gap between green production intention and behavior? Based on the perspective of farmers' perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434: 139743.
Go to original source...
- Yazdanpanah M., Moghadam M.T., Zobeidi T., Turetta A.P.D., Eufemia L., Sieber S. (2022): What factors contribute to conversion to organic farming? Consideration of the Health Belief Model in relation to the uptake of organic farming by Iranian farmers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65: 907-929.
Go to original source...
- Yi X., Yu L., Chang S.H.E., Yin C., Wang H., Zhang Z. (2021): The effects of China's Organic-Substitute-Chemical-Fertilizer (OSCF) policy on greenhouse vegetable farmers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297: 126677.
Go to original source...
- Yu L.L., Zhao D.Y., Xue Z.H., Gao Y. (2020): Research on the use of digital finance and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms in China. Technology in Society, 62: 101323.
Go to original source...
- Yu L., Chen C., Niu Z., Gao Y., Yang H., Xue Z. (2021): Risk aversion, cooperative membership and the adoption of green control techniques: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279: 123288.
Go to original source...
- Yu L., Liu W., Yang S., Kong R., He X. (2022): Impact of environmental literacy on farmers' agricultural green production behavior: Evidence from rural China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 990981.
Go to original source...
- Zhang L., Li X., Yu J., Yao X. (2018): Toward cleaner production: What drives farmers to adopt eco-friendly agricultural production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 184: 550-558.
Go to original source...
- Zhao L., Wang C., Gu H., Yue C. (2018): Market incentive, government regulation and the behavior of pesticide application of vegetable farmers in China. Food Control, 85: 308-317.
Go to original source...
- Zhao Q., Pan Y., Xia X. (2021): Internet can do help in the reduction of pesticide use by farmers: evidence from rural China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 2063-2073.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Zhong Y.P., Tang L.R., Li Y. (2022): Role of digital empowerment in developing farmers' green production by agro-tourism integration in Xichong, Sichuan. Agriculture, 12: 1761.
Go to original source...
- Zhou W., Yang Y., He J., Xu D. (2023): Does labor aging inhibit farmers' straw-returning behavior? Evidence from rural rice farmers in Southwest China. Land, 12: 1816.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.