Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2024, 70(10):465-473 | DOI: 10.17221/93/2024-AGRICECON

Are there trade-offs between animal welfare and egg-producing farm efficiency?Original Paper

David Hampel ORCID...1, Markéta Matulová ORCID...1, Martina Lichovníková ORCID...2, Jitka Janová ORCID...1
1 Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, the Czech Republic
2 Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Agrisciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, the Czech Republic

Agribusiness is currently faced with the challenge of providing sufficient quality food for a growing population with limited natural resources. Egg production, as an important source of nutrition, is a dynamically developing sector of livestock production on a global scale. Simultaneously, the increasing public and legal considerations of animal welfare affect egg-producing operations. This paper aims to provide insight into missing evidence in the trade-offs between animal welfare and efficiency in egg-producing farms in the Czech Republic and the European Union. Detailed data were gathered on the extent of the enriched cage and indoor cage-free housing systems (aviaries/barns) among the main 30 Czech table-egg-producers. Original micro data enlarged the information on table-egg producers collected using the Orbis database. For the efficiency analysis at the EU level, data on the housing systems were obtained from Eurostat and combined with aggregated data from the Orbis database. A robust data envelopment analysis was applied which benefits from including animal-welfare variables directly into the efficiency evaluation. The results showed a negative, but statistically insignificant, relationship between the animal welfare and efficiency of the egg producers for the Czech Republic table-egg producers as well as those on the EU-country level.

Keywords: agribusiness; bio-economics; data envelopment analysis; operations management; poultry industry; table-eggs

Received: March 8, 2024; Revised: September 2, 2024; Accepted: September 24, 2024; Prepublished online: October 15, 2024; Published: October 31, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hampel D, Matulová M, Lichovníková M, Janová J. Are there trade-offs between animal welfare and egg-producing farm efficiency? Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2024;70(10):465-473. doi: 10.17221/93/2024-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abin R., Laca A., Laca A., Diaz M. (2018): Environmental assessment of intensive egg production: A Spanish case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179: 160-168. Go to original source...
    2. Anderson K.E. (2014): Time study examining the effect of range, cage-free, and cage environments on man-hours committed to bird care in 3 brown egg layer strains. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23: 108-115. Go to original source...
    3. Appleby M.C. (2003): The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: History and prospects. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6: 103-121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Bureau van Dijk (2021): Orbis database. [Unpublished raw data].
    5. Campe A., Hoes C., Koesters S., Froemke C., Bessei W., Knierim U., Schrader L., Kreienbrock L., Thobe P. (2015): Determinants of economic success in egg production in Germany - here: laying hens kept in aviaries or small-group housing systems. Applied Agricultural and Forestry Research, 65: 227-238.
    6. Castro F.L.S., Chai L., Arango J., Owens C.M., Smith P.A., Reichelt S., DuBois C., Menconi A. (2023): Poultry industry paradigms: Connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 32: 100310. Go to original source...
    7. Cecchini L., Torquati B., Chiorri M. (2018): Sustainable agri-food products: A review of consumer preference studies through experimental economics. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 64: 554-565. Go to original source...
    8. Cecchini L., Viecel L., D'Urs A., Magistrali C.F., Forte C., Mignacca S.A., Trabalza-Marinucci M., Chiorri M. (2021): Farm efficiency related to animal welfare performance and management of sheep farms in marginal areas of central Italy: A two-stage DEA model. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 20: 955-969. Go to original source...
    9. Dawkins M.S. (2017): Animal welfare and efficient farming: Is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science, 57: 201-208. Go to original source...
    10. Dawkins M.S., Layton R. (2012): Breeding for better welfare: Genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents. Animal Welfare, 21: 147-155. Go to original source...
    11. Demircan V., Yilmaz H., Dernek Z., Bal T., Gül M., Koknaroglu H. (2010): Economic analysis of different laying hen farm capacities in Turkey. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 489-497. Go to original source...
    12. Englmaierova M., Tumova E., Charvatova V., Skrivan M. (2014): Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 59: 345-352. Go to original source...
    13. European Commission (2022). Laying hens by way of keeping. [Dataset]. Available at https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/animal-products/eggs_en (accessed Mar 8, 2024).
    14. Fossum O., Jansson D.S., Etterlin P.E., Vagsholm I. (2009): Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 51: 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. International Poultry Testing (2023): Ways of laying hen keeping of Czech table egg producers. [Unpublished raw data].
    16. Janová J. (2014): Crop plan optimization under risk on a farm level in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 60: 123-132. Go to original source...
    17. Janová J., Bödeker K., Bingham L., Kindu M., Knoke T. (2024): The role of validation in optimization models for forest management. Annals of Forest Science, 81: 19. Go to original source...
    18. Rodenburg T.B., van Gerwen M., Meijer E., Tobias T.J., Giersberg M.F., Goerlich-Jansson V., Nordquist R.E., Meijboom F.L.B., Arndt S. (2020): End the Cage Age: Looking for Alternatives. Overview of Alternatives to Cage Systems and the Impact on Animal Welfare and Other Aspects of Sustainability. Brussels, European Parliament: 54. Available at https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/415340/IPOL_STU_2020_658539_EN_3_.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed Mar 8, 2024).
    19. Rondoni A., Asioli D., Millan E. (2020): Consumer behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 106: 391-401. Go to original source...
    20. Schütz A., Sonntag W.I., Christoph-Schulz I., Faletar I. (2023): Assessing citizens' views on the importance of animal welfare and other sustainability aspects in livestock farming using best-worst scaling. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4: 1201685. Go to original source...
    21. Schulte H.D., Armbrecht L., Buerger R., Gauly M., Musshoff O., Hüttel S. (2018): Let the cows graze: An empirical investigation on the trade-off between efficiency and farm animal welfare in milk production. Land Use Policy, 79: 375-385. Go to original source...
    22. Sherwin C.M., Richards G.J., Nicol C.J. (2010): Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. British Poultry Science, 51: 488-499. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Simar L., Wilson P.W. (1998): Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44: 49-61. Go to original source...
    24. Simar L., Wilson P.W. (2007): Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136: 31-64. Go to original source...
    25. Staňková M., Hampel D., Janová J. (2022): Micro-data efficiency evaluation of forest companies: The case of Central Europe. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 43: 441-456. Go to original source...
    26. Turner I., Heidari D., Pelletier N. (2022): Environmental impact mitigation potential of increased resource use efficiency industrial egg production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354: 131743. Go to original source...
    27. Van Horne P.L.M., Bondt N. (2023): Competitiveness of the EU egg sector, base year 2021: International comparison of production costs of eggs and egg products. Sustainable Value Chain Transition Risk and Innovation Governance. Wageningen, Wageningen Economic Research: 51. Go to original source...
    28. Weeks C.A., Lambton S.L., Williams A.G. (2016): Implications for welfare, productivity and sustainability of the variation in reported levels of mortality for laying hen flocks kept in different housing systems: A meta-analysis of ten studies. PLoS One, 11: e0146394. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Wiengarten F., Fan D., Lo C.K., Pagell M. (2017): The differing impacts of operational and financial slack on occupational safety in varying market conditions. Journal of Operations Management, 52: 30-45. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content