Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2024, 70(5):226-243 | DOI: 10.17221/386/2023-AGRICECON

Target price policy and rural household income: Evidence from ChinaOriginal Paper

Genjin Sun ORCID...1,2, Yanxiu Liu ORCID...3, Yurong Zhu ORCID...1
1 School of Business and Tourism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan, P. R. China
2 Department of Economics, University of Essex, Colchester, the United Kingdom
3 Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, P. R. China

Agricultural subsidy policy can improve the planting enthusiasm of rural households by increasing their income. It is of great significance to assess and summarise the effect of the soybean and cotton target price subsidy policy and to determine future policy direction. Using the national rural fixed-observation point socioeconomic survey data from 2009 to 2017, the study employed the difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the impact of the target price policy (TPP) on rural household income in China. TPP had no significant impact on the total income of rural households. Specifically, TPP increased the farm income of rural households but simultaneously reduced the wage income and had no significant impact on the other income. Moreover, the impact of TPP on rural household income varied with the planting scale and income level; the effect of TPP was strong among the non-poor or scale operation rural households. TPP implementation affected rural household farm and wage income by affecting farmers’ allocation of working time and cost input. Therefore, implementing TPP should consider farmers’ participation in non-farm employment, further adjust the subsidy intensity and scope, and combine direct subsidies with the poverty reduction effect in poor areas. The contribution of this article is to explore the implementation effect of target price subsidy policies from the perspective of farmers’ income, to deconstruct farmers’ income, and explore the mechanism of policy action. This paper provides a theoretical basis and policy inspiration for China to improve and adjust the agricultural subsidy policy, mobilise farmers’ enthusiasm to cultivate, and ensure national food security.

Keywords: agricultural subsidy policy; difference-in-differences; farmers' income; influence mechanism; labour income allocation

Received: November 13, 2023; Revised: March 7, 2024; Accepted: April 8, 2024; Published: May 29, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sun G, Liu Y, Zhu Y. Target price policy and rural household income: Evidence from China. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2024;70(5):226-243. doi: 10.17221/386/2023-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    Supplementary files:

    Download file386-2023-AGRICECON_ESM.pdf

    File size: 609.27 kB

    References

    1. Acharya V.V., Baghai R.P., Subramanian K.V. (2014): Wrongful discharge laws and innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27: 301-346. Go to original source...
    2. Ahearn M.C., El-Osta H., Dewbre J. (2006): The impact of coupled and decoupled government subsidies on off-farm labor participation of U.S. farm operators. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88: 393-408. Go to original source...
    3. Alene A.D., Coulibaly O. (2009): The impact of agricultural research on productivity and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 34: 198-209. Go to original source...
    4. Asfaw A., Lemenih M., Kassa H., Ewnwtu Z. (2013): Importance, determinants and gender dimensions of forest income in eastern highlands of Ethiopia: The case of communities around Jelo Afromontane Forest. Forest Policy and Economics, 28: 1-7. Go to original source...
    5. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. (1986): The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Becker G. (1965): A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75: 493-517. Go to original source...
    7. Bertrand M., Duflo E., Mullainathan S. (2004): How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119: 249-275. Go to original source...
    8. Briggeman B.C., Gray A.W., Morehart M.J., Baker T.G., Wilson C.A. (2007): A new U.S. rural household typology: Implications for agricultural policy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29: 765-782. Go to original source...
    9. Burfisher M.E., Hopkins J. (2012): Decoupled Payments: Household Income Transfers in Contemporary US Agriculture. Agricultural Economics Report No. 822. Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture: 33.
    10. Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, State Council of the People's Republic of China (2014): (Several Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Agriculture and Accelerating the Modernization of Agriculture). Available at http://www.moa.gov.cn/gk/zcfg/qnhnzc/201401/t20140121_3743917.htm (accessed Oct 22, 2022; in Chinese)
    11. Chang Y.M., Huang B.W., Chen Y.J. (2012): Labor supply, income, and welfare of the rural household. Labour Economics, 19: 427-437. Go to original source...
    12. Chen Y., Li X., Wang J. (2011): Changes and effecting factors of grain production in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 21: 676-684. Go to original source...
    13. Ciaian P., Baldoni E., Kancs D.A., Drabik D. (2021): The capitalization of agricultural subsidies into land prices. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 13: 17-38. Go to original source...
    14. Clever J., Wu X. (2016): Chinese Production and Imports to Drop to Lowest Level in Over a Decade. GAIN Report CH16024. Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, GAIN Report CH16024.
    15. Coble K.H., Barnett B.J. (2013): Why do we subsidize crop insurance? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95: 498-504. Go to original source...
    16. Du Y., Park A., Wang S. (2005): Migration and rural poverty in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33: 688-709. Go to original source...
    17. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2021): The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Transforming Food Systems for Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Affordable Healthy Diets for All. Rome, FAO: 240.
    18. Ferrara E.L., Chong A., Duryea S. (2012): Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4: 1-31. Go to original source...
    19. Gao L., Du Z. (2018): (An empirical study on the impact of target price reform on China's cotton market). Reform, 293: 137-147. (in Chinese)
    20. Garnaut R., Song L., Cai F. (2018): China's 40 Years of Reform and Development 1978-2018. Canberra, ANU Press: 679. Go to original source...
    21. Haggblade S., Hazell P., Reardon T. (2010) The rural non-farm economy: Prospects for growth and poverty reduction. World Development, 38: 1429-1441. Go to original source...
    22. He C., Yu L. (2020): (Does the change from the temporary purchasing and storage policy to the Target Price Policy increase the soybean acreage? An analysis based on a difference-in-differences technique). Chinese Rural Economy, 405: 29-46. (in Chinese)
    23. Heerink N., Kuiper M., Shi X. (2006): China's new rural income support policy: Impacts on grain production and rural income inequality. China and World Economy, 9: 58-69. Go to original source...
    24. Hejazi M., Marchant M.A. (2017): China's evolving agricultural support policies. Choices, 32: 1-7.
    25. Hu D., Yang X., Wang S. (2019): The impact of soybean Target Price Subsidy Policy on farmers' production behavior. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 287: 16-24.
    26. Huang J., Yang G. (2017): Understanding recent challenges and new food policy in China. Global Food Security, 91: 119-126. Go to original source...
    27. Keeney M. (2000): The distributional impact of direct payments on Irish farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51: 252-263. Go to original source...
    28. Kim K., Chavas J P. (2002): A dynamic analysis of the effects of a price support program on price dynamics and price volatility. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27: 495-514.
    29. Li J., Liu W., Song Z. (2020): Sustainability of the adjustment schemes in China's grain price support policy: An empirical analysis based on the partial equilibrium model of wheat. Sustainability, 12: 6447. Go to original source...
    30. Liang H., Meng Y. (2024): Impact of direct payments and non-financial support on smallholder income from environmentally friendly agriculture in Tohoku region, Japan. Journal of Environmental Management, 351: 119698. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Liu M., Yang S., Li H. (2018): Analysis on the influence of soybean target price policy on farmers' behavioral decision-making. Modern Economy, 9: 889-896. Go to original source...
    32. Liu Z., Liang H., Pu D., Xie F., Zhang E., Zhou Q. (2020a): How does the control of grain purchase price affect the sustainability of the national grain industry? One empirical study from China. Sustainability, 12: 2102. Go to original source...
    33. Liu X., Shi L., Engel B.A., Sun S., Zhao X., Wu P., Wang Y. (2020b): New challenges of food security in Northwest China: Water footprint and virtual water perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245: 118939. Go to original source...
    34. Lopez R.A., He X., De Falcis E. (2017): What drives China's new agricultural subsidies? World Development, 93: 279-292. Go to original source...
    35. Lu B., Chen Y., Zhao X. (2017): (Analysis of satisfaction and influencing factors of cotton target price subsidy policies: Based on the comparison of two cotton regions in Xinjiang). Xinjiang State Farms Economy, 12: 10-16. (in Chinese)
    36. Lv F., Deng L., Zhang Z., Wang Z., Wu Q., Qiao J. (2022): Multiscale analysis of factors affecting food security in China, 1980-2017. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29: 6511-6525. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. Merem E., Twumasi Y., Wesley J., Alsarari M., Fageir S., Crisler M., Romorno C., Olagbegi D., Hines A., Ochai G.S., Nwagboso E., Leggett S., Forster D., Purry V., Williams J. (2019): Regional assessment of the food security situation in West Africa with GIS. Food and Public Health, 9: 60-77. Go to original source...
    38. Mukhopadhyay K., Thomassin P.J., Zhang J. (2018): Food security in China at 2050: A global CGE exercise. Journal of Economic Structures, 7: 1-29. Go to original source...
    39. Piao S., Ciais P., Huang Y., Shen Z., Peng S., Li J., Zhou L., Liu H., Ma Y., Ding Y., Friedlingstein P., Liu C., Tan K., Yu Y., Zhang T., Fang J. (2010): The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature, 467: 43-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Qu X., Wang W. (2021): (Effect of subsidy policy of cotton target price on cotton farmers' income). China Cotton, 48: 1-7+40. (in Chinese)
    41. Quiroga S., Suárez C., Fernández-Haddad Z., Philippidis G. (2017): Levelling the playing field for European Union agriculture: Does the Common Agricultural Policy impact homogeneously on farm productivity and efficiency? Land Use Policy, 68: 179-188. Go to original source...
    42. Reardon T., Taylor J.E., Stamoulis K., Lanjouw P., Balisacan A. (2000): Effects of non-farm employment on rural income inequality in developing countries: An investment perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51: 266-288. Go to original source...
    43. Shang L., Jafaria Y., Heckeleia T. (2020): Market and welfare impact assessment of the target price-based Subsidy Program in the Chinese Cotton Market. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 17: 53-70. Go to original source...
    44. Sharma S. (2014): Counter-cyclical payments under Doha negotiations: An analysis of agricultural subsidy programme of the US. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 27: 209-219. Go to original source...
    45. Taylor A.B., MacKinnon D.P., Tein J.Y. (2008): Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 241-269. Go to original source...
    46. Tyllianakis E., Martin-Ortega J. (2021): Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: How we are not yet 'hitting the right keys'. Land Use Policy, 109: 105620. Go to original source...
    47. Wang L. (2021): (Analysis of the impact of target price subsidy policy on cotton production efficiency). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management, 3: 50-60. (in Chinese)
    48. Wang X., Shen Y. (2014): The effect of China's agricultural tax abolition on rural families' incomes and production. China Economic Review, 29: 185-199. Go to original source...
    49. Wang X.G., Si W. (2021): (Does the reform of soybean subsidy policy realize the expansion of soybean production? An empirical analysis based on 124 prefecture-level cities in soybean main producing areas). Chinese Rural Economy, 444: 44-65. (in Chinese)
    50. Wang J., Zhang Z., Liu Y. (2018): Spatial shifts in grain production increases in China and implications for food security. Land Use Policy, 74: 204-213. Go to original source...
    51. Wang W., Zhang C., Song J., Xu D. (2021): The impact of target price policy on cotton cultivation: Analysis of county-level panel data from China. Agriculture, 11: 988. Go to original source...
    52. World Bank (2020): The Effect of New PPP Estimates on Global Poverty: A First Look. Washington D.C., The World Bank: 36.
    53. Xie H., Wang B. (2017): An empirical analysis of the impact of agricultural product price fluctuations on China's grain yield. Sustainability, 9: 906. Go to original source...
    54. Xu C., Wang H., Shi Q. (2012): Farmers' income and production responses to rural taxation reform in three regions in China. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63: 291-309. Go to original source...
    55. Xu X., Wu B., Zhang Z. (2016): (Policy evolution and effectiveness evaluation of soybean target price subsidies). Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10: 81-87. (in Chinese)
    56. Xu J., Zhou Z., Chu Y., Hu X. (2020): (Does target price policy enhance function of soybean futures market? Study based on difference-in-differences model). Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 224: 23-33. (in Chinese)
    57. Zhang J. (2022): Research on the impact of soybean target price subsidy system on farmers' income: An econometric analysis based on DID model. Finance Economy, 551: 77-86.
    58. Zhang Z., Meng X., Elahi E. (2022): Protection of cultivated land resources and grain supply security in main grain-producing areas of China. Sustainability, 14: 2808. Go to original source...
    59. Zhao L., Tan C. (2019): (Measuring the farmers' planting decision - making in Inner Mongolia under resource and environment management). Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 33: 23-29. (in Chinese)
    60. Zuo L., Zhang Z., Carlson K.M., MacDonald G.K., Brauman K.A., Liu Y., Zhang W., Zhang H., Wu W., Zhao X., Wang X., Liu B., Yi L., Wen Q., Liu F., Xu J., Hu S., Sun F., Gerber J.S., West P.C. (2018): Progress towards sustainable intensification in China challenged by land-use change. Nature Sustainability, 1: 304-313. Go to original source...
    61. Zhou J., Xu N., Zhang W., Ning X. (2024): Can agricultural low-carbon development benefit from urbanization - Empirical evidence from China's new-type urbanization pilot policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435: 140388. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content