Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2023, 69(7):284-290 | DOI: 10.17221/149/2023-AGRICECON

A parametric analysis of eco-efficiency and its determinants: Evidence from Norwegian dairy farmsOriginal Paper

Habtamu Alem1
1 Department of Economics and Society, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Ås, Norway

This study aims to estimate eco-efficiency scores and identify determinants of Norwegian dairy farms using a parametric approach that accounts for methane emissions. The study incorporates an environmental output measure and draws on 30 years of panel data from 692 specialist dairy farms (1991–2020). The findings indicate that Norwegian dairy farms are inefficient, with room for improvement in the dairy production system and the environment. According to the average eco-efficiency score, conventional dairy farms could cut input use and CH4 emissions by 5% while maintaining output. Furthermore, the study found that land tenure, experience, and government subsidies all positively impact eco-efficiency. Policymakers should encourage the best-performing dairy farms to share information on increasing productivity while considering environmental concerns to achieve better social and agricultural development. It should be noted that the study only looks at livestock methane emissions; future research may investigate other environmental factors.

Keywords: agricultural system; dairy farming; emission; farm performance; technology

Received: May 2, 2023; Revised: June 9, 2023; Accepted: June 12, 2023; Prepublished online: July 14, 2023; Published: July 25, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Alem H. A parametric analysis of eco-efficiency and its determinants: Evidence from Norwegian dairy farms. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2023;69(7):284-290. doi: 10.17221/149/2023-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adenuga A.H., Davis J., Hutchinson G., Donnellan T., Patton M. (2018): Modelling regional environmental efficiency differentials of dairy farms on the island of Ireland. Ecological Indicators, 95: 851-861. Go to original source...
    2. Alem H., Lien G., Hardaker J.B., Guttormsen A. (2019): Regional differences in technical efficiency and technological gap of Norwegian dairy farms: A stochastic meta-frontier model. Applied Economics, 51: 409-421. Go to original source...
    3. Alem H. (2023): The role of green total factor productivity to farm-level performance: evidence from Norwegian dairy farms. Agricultural and Food Economics, 11: 2. Go to original source...
    4. Bale¾entis T., Dabkienė V., ©treimikienė D. (2022): Eco-efficiency and shadow price of greenhouse gas emissions in Lithuanian dairy farms: An application of the slacks-based measure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 356: 131857. Go to original source...
    5. Byerlee D., Deininger K. (2013): Growing resource scarcity and global farmland investment. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5: 13-34. Go to original source...
    6. Cabrera V.E., Solis D., Del Corral J. (2010): Determinants of technical efficiency among dairy farms in Wisconsin. Journal of Dairy Science, 93: 387-393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Czy¿ewski B., Matuszczak A., Grzelak A., Guth M., Majchrzak A. (2021): Environmental sustainable value in agriculture revisited: How does Common Agricultural Policy contribute to eco-efficiency? Sustainability Science, 16: 137-152. Go to original source...
    8. FAO (2020): FAOSTAT Emissions shares. [Dataset]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/EM (accessed Dec 20, 2022).
    9. Førsund F.R. (2018): Multi-equation modelling of desirable and undesirable outputs satisfying the materials balance. Empirical Economics, 54: 67-99. Go to original source...
    10. Greene W. (2005): Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23: 7-32. Go to original source...
    11. Huppes G., Ishikawa M. (2005): A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9: 25-41. Go to original source...
    12. Kumbhakar S., Wang H.-J., Horncastle A. (2015): A Practitioner's Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 556. Go to original source...
    13. Kuosmanen T., Kortelainen M. (2005): Measuring the efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9: 59-72. Go to original source...
    14. IPCC (2006): Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Available at https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/ (accessed Jan 5, 2023).
    15. Jondrow J., Lovell C.K., Materov I.S., Schmidt P. (1982): On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19: 233-238. Go to original source...
    16. Le S., Jeffrey S., An H. (2020): Greenhouse gas emissions and technical efficiency in Alberta dairy production: What are the trade-offs? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 52: 177-193. Go to original source...
    17. Mamardashvili P., Emvalomatis G., Jan P. (2016): Environmental performance and shadow value of polluting on Swiss dairy farms. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 41: 225-246.
    18. Minviel J.J., Sipiläinen T. (2018): Dynamic stochastic analysis of the farm subsidy-eco-efficiency link: Evidence from France. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 50: 41-54. Go to original source...
    19. Murty S., Russell R.R., Levkoff S.B. (2012). On modeling pollution-generating technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64: 117-135. Go to original source...
    20. NIR (2020): Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990-2018, National Inventory Report. Norwegian Environment Agency. Available at https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/m1643/m1643.pdf (accessed Dec 12, 2022).
    21. Orea L., Wall A. (2017): A parametric approach to estimating eco-efficiency. Journal of Environmental Management, 68: 901-907. Go to original source...
    22. Pelletier N., Arsenault N., Tyedmers P. (2008): Scenario modeling potential eco-efficiency gains from a transition to organic agriculture: life cycle perspectives on Canadian canola, corn, soy, and wheat production. Environmental Management, 42: 989-1001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Perez-Urdiales M., Lansink A.O., Wall A. (2015): Eco-efficiency among dairy farmers: the importance of socio-economic characteristics and farmer attitudes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64: 559-574. Go to original source...
    24. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Gómez-Limón J.A., Reig-Martínez E. (2011): Assessing farming eco-efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 92: 1154-1164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Saling P., Kicherer A., Dittrich-Krämer B., Wittlinger R., Zombik W., Schmidt I., Schmidt S. (2002): Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: the method. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7: 203-218. Go to original source...
    26. Shortall O.K., Barnes A.P. (2013): Greenhouse gas emissions and the technical efficiency of dairy farmers. Ecological Indicators, 29: 478-488. Go to original source...
    27. Skevas T., Cabrera V.E. (2020): Measuring farmers' dynamic technical and udder health management inefficiencies: The case of Wisconsin dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 103: 12117-12127. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Sipiläinen T., Kumbhakar S.C., Lien G. (2013): The performance of dairy farms in Finland and Norway from 1991 to 2008. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41: 63-86. Go to original source...
    29. Song J., Chen X. (2019): Eco-efficiency of grain production in China based on water footprints: A stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236: 117685. Go to original source...
    30. SSB (2021): Environmental accounting. Emissions from Norwegian economic activity. Statistics Norway. [Dataset]. Available at https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/09298/ (accessed Dec 12, 2022).
    31. Stetter C., Sauer J. (2022): Greenhouse gas emissions and eco-performance at farm level: A parametric approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81: 617-647. Go to original source...
    32. Wang H.J. (2002): Heteroscedasticity and non-monotonic efficiency effects of a stochastic frontier model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18: 241-253. Go to original source...
    33. Wettemann P.J.C., Latacz-Lohmann U. (2017): An efficiency-based concept to assess potential cost and greenhouse gas savings on German dairy farms. Agricultural Systems, 152: 27-37. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content