Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2022, 68(4):146-157 | DOI: 10.17221/383/2021-AGRICECON

Is money more important than status? A case of Romanian peasantsOriginal Paper

Lucia Ovidia Vreja ORCID...
Department of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

Agriculture has lost its importance in many parts of the world, leaving peasants in a state of uncertainty regarding their social status and identity. This article uses both quantitative and qualitative data to present the changes experienced by Romanian peasants as a result of an entire series of processes which led to the loss of their place within society. Statistical data are used to illustrate the evolution of the most relevant agriculture-related indicators over the last three decades. Qualitative data are presented in order to explain how developments in agriculture were perceived by peasants. While the changes might be irreversible, the story of the 'old' class of peasants should constitute a starting point for redesigning national policies and avoiding the disintegration of an entire social class.

Keywords: livestock farming; social status; stock farmer; traditional agriculture

Published: April 14, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vreja LO. Is money more important than status? A case of Romanian peasants. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2022;68(4):146-157. doi: 10.17221/383/2021-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Baghiu Ş., Pojoga V. (2019): Ruralism and literature in Romania: An introduction. In: Baghiu Ş., Pojoga V., Sass M. (eds): Ruralism and Literature in Romania. Berlin, Germany, Peter Lang: 13-18. Go to original source...
    2. Bălan S. (2011): Ethnographic method in anthropological research. Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3: 61-69.
    3. Battistelli F., Galantino M.G. (2019): Dangers, risks and threats: An alternative conceptualization to the catch-all concept of risk. Current Sociology, 67: 64-78. Go to original source...
    4. Bauerkämper A., Iordachi C. (2014): The collectivization of agriculture in Eastern Europe: Entanglements and transnational comparisons. In: Iordachi C., Bauerkämper A. (eds): The Collectivization of Agriculture in Communist Eastern Europe: Comparison and Entanglements. Budapest, Hungary, Central European University Press: 3-46. Go to original source...
    5. Bauman Z. (2000): Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Polity Press: 130-167.
    6. Beck U. (1992): Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London, United Kingdom, Sage Publications: 91-150.
    7. Bernstein H. (2003): Farewells to the peasantry. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 52: 1-19. Go to original source...
    8. Boltvinik J. (2016): Poverty and persistence of the peasantry: Background paper. In: Boltvinik J., Mann S.A. (eds): Peasant Poverty and Persistence in the Twenty-first Century: Theories, Debates, Realities and Policies. London, United Kingdom, Zed Books: 45-91. Go to original source...
    9. Borgerhoff Mulder M., Fazzio I., Irons W., McElreath R.L., Bowles S., Bell A., Hertz T., Hazzah L. (2010): Pastoralism and wealth inequality. Revisiting an old question. Current Anthropology, 51: 35-48. Go to original source...
    10. Bourdieu P. (1984): Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Harvard University Press: 318-371.
    11. Boyce C.J., Brown G.D.A., Moore S.C. (2010): Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21: 471-475. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Brown-Saracino J. (2004): Social preservationists and the quest for authentic community. City & Community, 3: 135-156. Go to original source...
    13. Csoba J. (2020): Revitalisation of the Household Economy. Social Integration Strategies in Disadvantaged Rural Areas of Hungary. Wiesbaden, Germany, Springer: 115-132. Go to original source...
    14. Deletant D. (2019): Romania under Communism. Paradox and Degeneration. London, United Kingdom, Routledge: 49-88.
    15. DeWalt K.M., DeWalt B.R. (2011): Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Walnut Creek, US, Rowman Altamira: 1-17.
    16. Douglas M., Wildavsky A.B. (1983): Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, US, University of California Press: 1-15. Go to original source...
    17. EC (2020): Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Statistics. Eurostat, European Commission (EC). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/12069644/KS-FK-20-001-EN-N.pdf/a7439b01-671b-80ce-85e44d803c44340a?t=1608139005821 (accessed Feb 3, 2022).
    18. Ellis L., Hoskin A.W., Ratnasingam M. (2018): Handbook of Social Status Correlates. London, United Kingdom, Academic Press: 1-14. Go to original source...
    19. FAO (2021): Faostat. Trade: Crops and livestock products. [Dataset]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TCL (accessed June 21, 2021).
    20. Faunce W.A. (1990): On the meaning of occupational status: Implications for stratification theory and research. Sociological Focus, 23: 267-285. Go to original source...
    21. Geoportal ANCPI (2022): Topographic Map. [Interactive Map]. National Agency for Cadastre and Land Registration. Available at https://geoportal.ancpi.ro/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1 (accessed Jan 4, 2022).
    22. Giannakis E., Bruggeman A. (2020): Regional disparities in economic resilience in the European Union across the urban-rural divide. Regional Studies, 54: 1200-1213. Go to original source...
    23. Giddens A. (1991): Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Polity Press: 70-108.
    24. Henrich J., Gil-White F.J. (2001): The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22: 165-196. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Kanazawa S. (2015): Evolutionary psychology and its relevance to the social sciences. In: Turner J.H., Machalek R., Maryanski A. (eds): Handbook on Evolution and Society. Toward an Evolutionary Social Science. Boulder, US, Paradigm Publishers: 136-156.
    26. Keshabyan A., Day M.V. (2020): Concerned whether you'll make it in life? Status anxiety uniquely explains job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 1523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Kideckel D.A. (1983): Secular ritual and social change: A Romanian case. Anthropological Quarterly, 56: 69-75. Go to original source...
    28. Kideckel D.A. (2009): Getting by in the last decade: Reflections on the conditions of workers, the market, and capitalism in two Romanian regions. Journal of International Relations and Development, 12: 403-409. Go to original source...
    29. Komarek A.M., De Pinto A., Smith V.H. (2020): A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 178: 102738. Go to original source...
    30. Krader L. (1960): The transition from serf to peasant in Eastern Europe. Anthropological Quarterly, 33: 76-90. Go to original source...
    31. Morén-Alegret R., Wladyka D. (2020): International Immigration, Integration and Sustainability in Small Towns and Villages. Socio-Territorial Challenges in Rural and Semi-Rural Europe. London, United Kingdom, Palgrave Macmillan: 129-294. Go to original source...
    32. NIS (2021): Tempo-Online [Dataset]. Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS). Available at http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table (accessed July 8, 2021).
    33. OECD (2000): Review of Agricultural Policies. Romania. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Paris, France, Head of Publications Division: 9-57.
    34. Ovreiu A.B., Bărsoianu I.A., Nistor C., Nedelea A., Comănescu L. (2021): Long-term dynamics of land use in the Romanian Plain - The Central Bărăgan, Romania. Agriculture, 11: 423. Go to original source...
    35. Patton M.Q. (2002): Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, US, Sage Publications: 209-259.
    36. Roberts A., Palermo R., Visser T.A.W. (2019): Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources. Scientific Reports, 9: 2473. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. Scheepers D., Ellemers N., Sintemaartensduk N. (2009): Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 1075-1092. Go to original source...
    38. Scoones I. (2020): Pastoralists and peasants: Perspectives on agrarian change. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48: 1-47. Go to original source...
    39. Shanin T. (1972): The Awkward Class. Political Sociology of Peasantry in a Developing Society: Russia 1910-1925. Oxford, United Kingdom, Clarendon Press: 1-6.
    40. Swain N. (2013): Green Barons, Force-of-Circumstance Entrepreneurs, Impotent Mayors. Rural Change in the Early Years of Post-Socialist Capitalist Democracy. Budapest, Hungary, Central European University Press: 71-112. Go to original source...
    41. Tsantis A., Pepper R. (1979): Romania. The Industrialization of an Agrarian Economy under Socialist Planning. Washington, D.C., US, World Bank: 77-86.
    42. Verdery K. (2004): The obligations of ownership: Restoring rights to land in postsocialist Transylvania. In: Verdery K., Humphrey C. (eds): Property in Question. Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Oxford, United Kingdom, Berg: 139-160. Go to original source...
    43. Weiner A.B. (1992): Inalienable Possessions. The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley, US, University of California Press: 23-43. Go to original source...
    44. Wolz A., Möllers J., Micu M.M. (2020): Options for agricultural service cooperatives in a postsocialist economy: Evidence from Romania. Outlook on Agriculture, 49: 57-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. World Bank (2021): DataBank. World Development Indicators. [Dataset]. Available at https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (accessed June 21, 2021).
    46. Wuthnow R. (2015): In the Blood. Understanding America's Farm Families. Princeton, US, Princeton University Press: 95-118. Go to original source...
    47. Zagata L. (2009): How organic farmers view their own practice: Results from the Czech Republic. Agriculture and Human Values, 27: 277-290. Go to original source...
    48. Zagata L., Hrabák J., Lošťák M. (2019): Post-socialist transition as a driving force of the sustainable agriculture: A case study from the Czech Republic. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44: 238-257. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content