Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2021, 67(12):479-490 | DOI: 10.17221/286/2021-AGRICECON

Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companiesOriginal Paper

Marilen Gabriel Pirtea1, Graţiela Georgiana Noja ORCID...2, Mirela Cristea ORCID...*,3, Mirela Panait4,5
1 Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
2 Department of Marketing and International Economic Relations, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania
3 Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Center for Economic, Banking and Financial Research (CEBAFI), Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
4 Department of Cybernetics, Economic Informatics, Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Ploiesti, Romania
5 Institute of National Economy, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

On the complex framing of the agricultural fields, related to the corporate social responsibility (CSR), the general objective of this paper is to assess the impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) credentials of CSR and human capital features on the financial performance of agricultural companies. The data consists of a sample of 412 public companies from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database, with data for 2020, operating in 17 agricultural areas with headquarters allocated around the world. The methodological endeavor embeds two econometric procedures, multifactorial models of robust regression and structural equation modelling (SEM). The research results bring new evidence to underline the risks related to the sustainability of the financial performance of agricultural companies and the decisive role played by the ESG dimensions to counteract these risks, particularly by the environmental pillar, along with CSR specific strategies and human capital characteristics (management board and employees). We propose several strategies for companies operating in agricultural fields in order to enhance profitability by CSR measures.

Keywords: agriculture; econometric modelling; environmental dimensions; profitability; social responsibility; strategy

Published: December 14, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pirtea MG, Noja GG, Cristea M, Panait M. Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2021;67(12):479-490. doi: 10.17221/286/2021-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    Supplementary files:

    Download file286-021 Agricecon ESM.pdf

    File size: 252.17 kB

    References

    1. Andrei J.V., Ion A.R., Popescu G.H., Nica E., Zaharia M. (2016): Implications of agricultural bioenergy crop production and prices in changing the land use paradigm - The case of Romania. Land Use Policy, 50: 399-407. Go to original source...
    2. Boffo R., Marshall C., Patalano R. (2020): ESG Investing: Environmental Pillar Scoring and Reporting. OECD Paris. Available at www.oecd.org/finance/esg-investingenvironmental-pillar-scoring-and-reporting.pdf (accessed July 22, 2021).
    3. Brzozowska A., Bubel D., Kalinichenko A., Nekrasenko L. (2017): Transformation of the agricultural financial system in the age of globalisation. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 63: 548-558. Go to original source...
    4. Buallay A. (2021): Sustainability reporting and agriculture industries' performance: Worldwide evidence. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies (in press). Go to original source...
    5. European Commission (2011): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ae5ada03-0dc3-48f8-9a32-0460e65ba7ed/languageen (accessed July 20, 2021).
    6. Florea N.M., Bădîrcea R.M., Pîrvu R.C., Manta A.G., Doran M.D., Jianu E. (2020): The impact of agriculture and renewable energy on climate change in Central and East European countries. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 66: 444-457. Go to original source...
    7. Grófová Š., Srnec K. (2012): Food crisis, food production and poverty. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 58: 119-126. Go to original source...
    8. Ika S.R., Akbar F.A., Puspitasari D., Sumbodo, B.T., Widagdo A.K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility reporting of agriculture companies: Evidence from Indonesia. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, International Conference on Sustainable Utilization of Natural Resources (Vol. 800, No. 1), Indonesia, Nov 28, 2020: 1-7. Go to original source...
    9. Jeníček V. (2010): World population - Development, transition. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 1-15. Go to original source...
    10. Khan S.A.R., Yu Z., Panait M., Janjua L.R., Shah A. (2021): Global Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives for Reluctant Businesses. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, IGI Global: 25-146. Go to original source...
    11. Knežević G., Pavlović V., Bojičić R. (2017): Does the board gender diversity impact financial performance in agriculture? Case of Serbian agriculture companies listed on Stock Exchange. Custos e Agronegocio, 13: 2-20.
    12. Levkivska L., Levkovych I. (2017): Social responsibility in Ukrainian agriculture: The regional issue. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 8: 97-114.
    13. Moreno-Moreno J., Velasco Morente F., Sanz Díaz M.T. (2018): Assessment of the operational and environmental efficiency of agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 64: 74-88. Go to original source...
    14. Panait M., Erokhin V., Andrei J.V., Gao T. (2020): Implication of TNCs in agri-food sector: Challenges, constraints and limits: Profit or CSR? Strategic Management, 25: 33-43. Go to original source...
    15. Resmi S.I., Begum N.N., Hassan, M.M. (2018): Impact of CSR on firm's financial performance: A study on some selected agribusiness industries of Bangladesh. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 4: 74-85.
    16. Roudaki J. (2018): Corporate governance structures and firm performance in large agriculture companies in New Zealand. Corporate Governance, 18: 987-1006. Go to original source...
    17. Simpson, J.R., Montgomery, D. (1998): A performance-based assessment of robust regression methods. Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation, 27: 1031-1049. Go to original source...
    18. Song A.K. (2019). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem - A critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics, 53: 569-590. Go to original source...
    19. Subić J., Jeločnik M. (2018): Economic-energetic parameters of biomethane production from the agricultural plant biomass. In: Thematic Proceedings, Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in Terms of the Republic of Serbia Strategic Goals Realization within the Danube Region: Support Programs for the Improvement of Agricultural and Rural Development, Serbia, Dec 14-15, 2017: 300-317.
    20. Thomson Reuters (2021): 2020 Eikon. [Dataset]. Thomson Reuters. Available at https://eikon.thomsonreuters.com/index.html (accessed May 20, 2021).
    21. Tomchuk O., Lepetan I., Zdyrko N., Vasa L. (2018): Environmental activities of agricultural enterprises: Accounting and analytical support. Economic Annals-XXI, 169: 77-83. Go to original source...
    22. Udayasankar K. (2008): Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 167-175. Go to original source...
    23. Vrabcová P., Urbancová H. (2021): Approaches of selected organisations in the Czech Republic to promoting the concept of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 67: 255-265. Go to original source...
    24. Yuan K.-H., Lu L. (2008): SEM with missing data and unknown population using two-stage ML: Theory and its application. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 62: 621-652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content