Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2021, 67(4):152-161 | DOI: 10.17221/347/2020-AGRICECON

Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms - Based on evidence from Polish crop farmsOriginal Paper

Jerzy Marzec ORCID..., Andrzej Pisulewski ORCID...*
Department of Econometrics and Operational Research, Institute of Quantitative Methods in Social Sciences, Cracow University of Economics, Kraków, Poland

In the present study, we have investigated several competing stochastic frontier models which differ in terms of the form of the production function (Cobb-Douglas or translog), inefficiency distribution (half-normal or exponential distribution) and type of prior distribution for the parameters (hierarchical or non-hierarchical from the Bayesian point of view). This last distinction corresponds to a difference between random coefficients and fixed coefficients models. Consequently, this study aims to examine to what extent inferences about estimates of farms' efficiency depend on the above assumptions. Moreover, the study intends to investigate how far the production function's characteristics are affected by the choice of the type of prior distribution for the parameters. First of all, it was found that the form of the production function does not impact the efficiency scores. Secondly, we found that measures of technical efficiency are sensitive to distributional assumptions about the inefficiency term. Finally, we have revealed that estimates of technical efficiency are reasonably robust to the prior information about the parameters of crop farms' production technology. There is also a resemblance in the elasticity of output with respect to inputs between the models considered in this paper. Additionally, the measurement of returns to scale is not sensitive to model specification.

Keywords: Bayesian approach; crop farms; random coefficients; stochastic frontier analysis

Published: April 16, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Marzec J, Pisulewski A. Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms - Based on evidence from Polish crop farms. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2021;67(4):152-161. doi: 10.17221/347/2020-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Aigner D., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. (1977): Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6: 21-37. Go to original source...
  2. Alvarez A., Arias C., Greene W. (2004): Accounting for unobservables in production models: Management and inefficiency. Economic Working Papers No., 72. Seville, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
  3. Areal F.J., Balcombe K., Tiffin R. (2012): Integrating spatial dependence into stochastic frontier analysis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics, 56: 521-541. Go to original source...
  4. Baráth L., Ferto I., Bojnec S. (2018): Are farms in less favoured areas less efficient? Agricultural Economics, 49: 3-12. Go to original source...
  5. Bojnec Š., Latruffe L. (2009): Determinants of technical efficiency of Slovenian farms. Post-Communist Economies, 21: 117-124. Go to original source...
  6. Broeck van den J., Koop G., Osiewalski J., Steel M.F.J. (1994): Stochastic frontier models: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Econometrics, 61: 273-303. Go to original source...
  7. Caudill S.B. (2003): Estimating a mixture of stochastic frontier regression models via the EM algorithm: A multiproduct cost function application. Empirical Economics, 28: 581-598. Go to original source...
  8. Čechura L. (2010): Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 183-191. Go to original source...
  9. Čechura L., Hockmann H., Malý M., Kroupová Z. (2015): Comparison of technology and technical efficiency in cereal production among EU countries. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7: 27-37. Go to original source...
  10. Čechura L., Grau A., Hockman H., Levkovych I., Kroupova Z. (2017): Catching up or falling behind in European agriculture: The case of milk production. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68: 206-227. Go to original source...
  11. Chib S. (1995): Marginal likelihood from Gibbs output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90: 1313-1321. Go to original source...
  12. Emvalomatis G. (2012): Productivity growth in German dairy farming using a flexible modelling approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63: 83-101. Go to original source...
  13. FADN (2020): Polish Farm Accountancy Data Network. [Dataset]. Unpublished Data.
  14. Feng G., Zhang X. (2012): Productivity and efficiency at large community banks in the US: A Bayesian true random effects stochastic distance frontier analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36: 1883-1895. Go to original source...
  15. Greene W.H. (2005): Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 126: 269-303. Go to original source...
  16. Greene W.H. (2012): Econometric Analysis. 7th Ed. Essex, England, Pearson Education: 1-1228.
  17. Hildreth C., Houck J.P. (1968): Some estimators for a linear model with random coefficients. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63: 584-595. Go to original source...
  18. Kalirajan K.P., Obwona M.B. (1994): Frontier production function: The stochastic coefficients approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56: 87-96. Go to original source...
  19. Koop G., Osiewalski J., Steel M. (1997): Bayesian efficiency analysis through individual effects: Hospital cost frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 76: 77-105. Go to original source...
  20. Latruffe L., Balcombe K., Davidova S., Zawalińska K. (2004): Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied Economics, 36: 1255-1263. Go to original source...
  21. Marzec J., Pisulewski A. (2017): The effect of CAP subsidies on the technical efficiency of Polish dairy farms. Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, 9: 243-273.
  22. Marzec J., Pisulewski A. (2019): The measurement of timevarying technical efficiency and productivity change in Polish crop farms. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68: 15-27. Go to original source...
  23. Njuki E., Bravo-Ureta B.E., O'Donnell C.J. (2019): Decomposing agricultural productivity growth using a randomparameters stochastic production frontier. Empirical Economics, 57: 839-860. Go to original source...
  24. Orea L., Kumbhakar S.C. (2004): Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model. Empirical Economics, 29: 169-183. Go to original source...
  25. Pisulewski A., Marzec J. (2019): Heterogeneity, transient and persistent technical efficiency of Polish crop farms. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 17: 1-14. Go to original source...
  26. Rossi P., Allenby G., McCulloch R. (2005): Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. Chichester, England, John Wiley & Sons: 1-348. Go to original source...
  27. Skevas I., Emvalomatis G., Brümmer B. (2018): Productivity growth measurement and decomposition under a dynamic inefficiency specification: The case of German dairy farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 271: 250-261. Go to original source...
  28. Skevas I. (2019): A hierarchical stochastic frontier model for efficiency measurement under technology heterogeneity. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17: 513-524. Go to original source...
  29. Swamy P.A. (1970): Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38: 311‒323. Go to original source...
  30. Tsionas E.G. (2002): Stochastic frontier models with random coefficients. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17: 127-147. Go to original source...
  31. Zhu X., Lansink A.O. (2010): Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61: 545-564. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.