Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2021, 67(1):21-32 | DOI: 10.17221/272/2020-AGRICECON

What is the impact of corporate governance on the food industry at different thresholds of internationalization? A reviewReview

Chun-Hsin Chou1, Joe-Ming Lee*,2, Ying-Maw Teng3, Hsiu-Ling Lee4
1 School of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China
2 Department of Applied Economics, Fo Guang University, Yilan County, Taiwan
3 Department of International Business, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
4 Department of Accounting, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

This research analyzes the dynamic effects of corporate governance, research and development (R&D) innovation, and financial policy on firm business performance under different internationalization threshold structures in Taiwan's food industry during the 2008-2019 period. The results illustrate R&D innovation's negative impact on business performance and the collateralization ratio by directors also has a negative influence. Conversely, the findings reveal that by considering the internationalization threshold effect, at a level of high internationalization, firms have positive influences on R&D innovation, and financial policy has a positive influence on business performance.

Keywords: financial policy; food industry; internationalization threshold; R&D innovation

Published: January 29, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chou C, Lee J, Teng Y, Lee H. What is the impact of corporate governance on the food industry at different thresholds of internationalization? A review. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2021;67(1):21-32. doi: 10.17221/272/2020-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Bae K.H., Goyal V.K. (2010): Equity market liberalization and corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16: 609-621. Go to original source...
  2. Bebchuk L.A., Brav A., Jiang W. (2015): The long-term effects of hedge fund activism. Working Paper No. 21227. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at https://www.nber.org/papers/w21227 Go to original source...
  3. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. (1981): Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49: 1057-1072. Go to original source...
  4. Ek R., Guerin S. (2011): Is there a right level of working capital? Journal of Corporate Treasury Management, 4: 137-149.
  5. Fama E.F., Jensen M.C. (1983): Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-325. Go to original source...
  6. Fernandes N., Ferreira M.A., Matos P., Murphy K.J. (2009): The pay divide: (Why) are US top executives paid more. University of Southern California. Working Paper No. 255/2009. Available at https://ecgi.global/workingpaper/pay-divide-why-are-us-top-executives-paid-more
  7. Gonzalez A., Teräsvirta T., van Dijk D.V. (2005): Panel smooth transition regression models. Series in Economics and Finance: Stockholm School of Economics. Working Paper No. 604.
  8. Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Kim H. (1997): International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 767-798. Go to original source...
  9. Hausman J.A. (1978): Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46: 1251-1271. Go to original source...
  10. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. (2003): Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74. Go to original source...
  11. John K., Senbet L.W. (1998): Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22: 371-403. Go to original source...
  12. Levin A., Lin C.F., Chu C.S.J. (2002): Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24. Go to original source...
  13. Likitwongkajon N., Vithessonthi C. (2020): Do foreign investments increase firm value and firm performance? Evidence from Japan. Research in International Business and Finance, 51: 101099. Go to original source...
  14. Micco A., Panizza U., Yanez M. (2007): Bank ownership and performance. Does politics matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 31: 219-241. Go to original source...
  15. Patel P., Keith P. (1995): Patterns of technological activity: Their measurement and interpretation. In: Stoneman P. (ed.): Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Cambridge, Blackwell: 14-51.
  16. Pedroni P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653-678. Go to original source...
  17. Schultz E., Tian G.Y., Twite G. (2013): Corporate governance and the CEO pay-performance link: Australian evidence. International Review of Finance, 13: 447-472. Go to original source...
  18. Schumpeter J. (2000): Entrepreneurship as innovation. In: Swedberg R. (ed.): Entrepreneurship. The Social Science View. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 51-75. Go to original source...
  19. Sullivan D. (1994): Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 325-342. Go to original source...
  20. Taiwan Economic Journal (2019): Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) Database. Available at http://www.finasia.biz/ensite/Database/tabid/92/language/en-US/Default.aspx

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.