Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2020, 66(5):203-214 | DOI: 10.17221/312/2019-AGRICECON

The impact of intra-industry trade on carbon dioxide emissions: The case of the European UnionOriginal Paper

Nuno Carlos Leitão1,2, Jeremiás Máté Balogh ORCID...*,3
1 Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Santarém, Portugal
2 Center for Advanced Studies in Management and Economics, Évora University, Évora, Portugal
3 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

The reductions of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are an essential objective of the European Union (EU) to achieving the reduction target by 20% by 2020. Along with energy consumption and agriculture, trade has a diverse impact on climate change. International trade usually negatively affects the environment, while the influence of intra-industry trade is more favourable. The paper investigates the impact of energy use, agriculture, and intra-industry trade on environmental pollution in EU countries using panel data for the period 2000-2014. The research frames the theoretical hypothesis that describing the relationship between agricultural intra-industry trade and climate change. The assumptions are confirmed by panel fixed effects, and Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) estimations, and the panel cointegration test. The empirical results have supported by the literature, and all variables used in this study are stationary applying panel unit root test. Results show that agricultural intra-industry trade, renewable energy is negatively correlated with climate change, confirming the less pollutant hypothesis, while economic growth and agricultural productivity induce environmental problems. This study confirms the theoretical hypotheses explaining the effect of intra-industry trade for agricultural products as well as the impacts of renewable energy use, agricultural land productivity, and economic growth on CO2 emissions.

Keywords: agriculture; climate change; economic growth; Europe; intra-industry trade; panel data; renewable energy

Published: May 31, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Leitão NC, Balogh JM. The impact of intra-industry trade on carbon dioxide emissions: The case of the European Union. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2020;66(5):203-214. doi: 10.17221/312/2019-AGRICECON.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file312-019 Agricecon final ESM.pdf

File size: 52.46 kB

References

  1. Amador F.O., Francois F.J., Oberdabernig A.D., Tomberger P. (2017): Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: An assessment based on production and consumption emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 135: 269-279. Go to original source...
  2. Antonakakis N., Chatziantoniou I., Filis G. (2017): Energy consumption, CO 2 emissions, and economic growth: An ethical dilemma. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68: 808-824. Go to original source...
  3. Antweiler W., Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. (2001): Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91: 877-908. Go to original source...
  4. Arellano M., Bover O. (1995): Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68: 29-51. Go to original source...
  5. Asumadu-Sarkodie S., Owusu P.A. (2017): The causal nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and agricultural ecosystem- an econometric approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24: 1608-1618. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Balassa B. (1986): Intra-industry specialization: A crosscountry analysis. European Economic Review, 30: 27-42. Go to original source...
  7. Balogh J.M., Jámbor A. (2017): Determinants of CO2 emission: A global evidence. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 75: 217-226. Available at: www. econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/5450/3328 (accessed Sept 1, 2019).
  8. Balsalobre-Lorente D., Driha O.M., Bekun F.V., Osundina O.A. (2019): Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS experience. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 25218-25234. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Bashir A., Thamrin H.M.K., Farhan M., Atiyatna D.P. (2019): The causality between human capital, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9: 98-104.
  10. Bilan Y., Streimikiene D., Vasylieva T., Lyulyov O., Pimonenko T., Pavlyk A. (2019): Linking between renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: Challenges for candidates and potential candidates for the EU membership. Sustainability, 11: 1-16. Go to original source...
  11. Blundell R., Bond S. (1998): Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87: 115-143. Go to original source...
  12. Brülhart M., Elliott R., Lindley J. (2006): Intra-industry trade and labour-market adjustment: A reassessment using data on individual workers. Review of World Economics, 142: 521-545. Go to original source...
  13. Cabral M., Silva J. (2006): Intra-industry trade expansion and employment reallocation between sectors and occupations. Review of World Economics, 142: 496-520. Go to original source...
  14. Cole M.A., Elliott R.J.R. (2003): Do environmental regulations influence trade patterns? Testing old and new trade theories. World Economy, 26: 1163-1186. Go to original source...
  15. Cole M.A., Elliott R.J.R., Okubo T. (2010): Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: An industrylevel study of Japan. Ecological Economics, 69: 1995-2002. Go to original source...
  16. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. (1994): North-south trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 755-87. Go to original source...
  17. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. (2004): Trade, growth and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42: 7-71. Go to original source...
  18. Chin M.Y., Puah C.H., Joseph J. (2018): The determinants of CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A new aspect. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8: 190-194. Available at: www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/ view/5912/3521
  19. Choi I. (2001): Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20: 249-272. Go to original source...
  20. Dasgupta P., Mukhopadhyay K. (2018): Pollution hypothesis and Indian´s intra-industry trade: an analysis. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 12: 287-307. Go to original source...
  21. Edoja P.E., Aye G.C., Abu O. (2016): Dynamic relationship among CO2 emission, agricultural productivity and food security in Nigeria. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4: 1-13. Go to original source...
  22. Echazu L., Heintzelman M. (2018): Environmental regulation and love for variety. Review of International Economics, 27: 413-429. Go to original source...
  23. European Commission (2019): EUROSTAT Statistics. Greenhouse Gas Emission Statistics - Emission Inventories. Available at: ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/ pdfscache/1180.pdf (accessed Sept 1, 2019).
  24. FAO (2019): Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, FAOSTAT Statistics Data. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed Sept 18, 2019).
  25. Greenaway D., Hine R., Milner C. (1994): Country-specific factors and the pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130: 77-100. Go to original source...
  26. Grether J.M., Matys A.N., De Melo J. (2010): Global manufacturing SO2 emissions: does trade matter? Review of World Economics, 145: 713-729. Go to original source...
  27. Grubel H., Lloyd P. (1975): Intra-industry trade. The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiation products. London, The Macmillan Press.
  28. Gürtzgen N., Rauscher M. (2000): Environmental policy, intra-industry trade and transfrontier pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17: 59-71. Go to original source...
  29. Hasnisah A., Azlina A.A., Taib C.M.I.C. (2019): The impact of renewable energy consumption on carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from developing countries in Asia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9: 135-143. Go to original source...
  30. Haupt A. (2006): Environmental policy in open economies and monopolistic competition. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33: 143-167. Go to original source...
  31. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. (2003): Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74. Go to original source...
  32. Ito T., Okubo T. (2012): New aspects of intra-industry trade in EU countries. The World Economy, 35: 1126-1138. Go to original source...
  33. Jámbor A., Leitão N.C. (2016): Industry-specific determinants of vertical intra-industry trade: the case of EU new member states' agri-food sector. Post-Communist Economies, 28: 34-48. Go to original source...
  34. Jebli B.M., Youssef S.B., Apergis N. (2019): The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Latin American Economic Review, 28: 1-19. Go to original source...
  35. Kahn M.E, Yoshino Y. (2004): Testing for pollution haven inside and outside of regional trade blocs. The B.E. Advances in Economic Analysis Policy, 3: 1-32. Go to original source...
  36. Krugman P. (1979): Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9: 469-479. Go to original source...
  37. Krugman P. (1980): Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70: 950-959. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/1805774 (accessed Sept 1, 2019).
  38. Leitão N.C., Shahbaz M. (2013): Carbon dioxide emissions, urbanization and globalization: A dynamic panel data. Economic Research Guardian, 3: 22-32.
  39. Levin A., Lin C.-F., Chu C.-S.J. (2002): Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24. Go to original source...
  40. Maddala G.S., Wu S. (1999): A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631-652. Go to original source...
  41. Martínez-Zarzoso I., Maruotti A. (2011): The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70: 1344-1353. Go to original source...
  42. Melitz M.J., Trefler D. (2012): Gains from trade when firms matter. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26: 91-118. Go to original source...
  43. Omri A., Kahouli B. (2014): Causal relationships between energy consumption, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models. Energy Policy, 67: 913-922. Go to original source...
  44. Pant P.K. (2009): Effect of agriculture on climate change: A cross country study of factor affecting carbon emissions. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 10: 72-88. Go to original source...
  45. Paweenawat S.W., Plyngam S. (2017): Does the causal relationship between renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth exist in Thailand? An ARDL approach. Economics Bulletin, 37: 697-711. Available at: pdfs.semanticscholar.org/18f6/ad2c63664d2ea635272c554a588fa9eaadb2. pdf (accessed Sept 1, 2019).
  46. Pedroni P. (2001): Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83: 727-731. Go to original source...
  47. Pedroni P. (2004): Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20: 597-625. Go to original source...
  48. Rasekhi S., Shojaee S.S. (2012): Determinant factors of the vertical intra-industry trade in agricultural sector: A study of Iran and its main trading partners. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 58: 180-190. Go to original source...
  49. Roy J. (2017): On the environmental consequences of intraindustry trade. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83: 50-67. Go to original source...
  50. Ruffin R.J. (1999): The nature of significance of intra-industry trade. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic & Financial Review, Fourth Quarter: 1-9. Available at: www.dallasfed. org/~/media/documents/research/efr/1999/efr9904a.pdf (accessed Sept 1, 2019).
  51. Saidi K., Hammami S. (2015): The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Reports, 1: 62-70. Go to original source...
  52. Sukono S., Albra W., Zulham T., Iskandarsyah Saputra J., Subartini B., Thalia F. (2019): The effect of gross domestic product and population on CO2 emissions in Indonesia: An application of the ant colony optimisation algorithm and CobbDouglas model. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9: 313-319. Go to original source...
  53. Tariq B., Rahim Ab. R. (2016): The environmental effects of intra-industry trade in the SAARC region. International Journal of Business and Society, 17: 113-130. Available at: www.ijbs. unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol17-no1-paper8.pdf (accessed Sept 1, 2019). Go to original source...
  54. Ullah A., Khan D., Khan I., Zheng S. (2018): Does agricultural ecosystem cause environmental pollution in Pakistan? Promise and menace. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25: 13938-13955. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Wang H., Ang B.W. (2018): Assessing the role of international trade in global CO2 emissions: An index decomposition analysis approach. Applied Energy, 218: 146-158. Go to original source...
  56. World Bank (2019a): World Development Indicator (WDI) Data. Available at: databank.worldbank.org/source/worlddevelopment-indicators (accessed Sept 1, 2019).
  57. World Bank (2019b): World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). Available at: wits.worldbank.org (accessed Oct 10, 2019).
  58. Yoshida Y., Leitão N.C., Faustino, H.C. (2009): Vertical intraindustry trade and foreign direct investment between Japan and European countries. Atlantic Economic Journal, 37: 351-365. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.