Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2020, 66(1):27-33 | DOI: 10.17221/151/2019-AGRICECON
The effects of capital constraints on the growth of agricultural cooperativesOriginal Paper
- 1 Center for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- 2 Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
In this paper, we examine how capital constraints affect the growth of US agricultural cooperatives. Employing a panel data set obtained from CoBank on 669 US agricultural cooperatives over 5 years, we employ system-generalised method of moments to estimate models of cooperative growth that incorporate long-term debt, allocated reserves, and retained earnings as continuous measures of capital constraints. We find that long-term debt use and size have positive impacts on cooperative growth, in violation of Gibrat's law, which posits that firm size and firm growth are independent. In particular, cash flow, unallocated equity and long-term debt financing are critical contributors to asset growth for small and medium-sized cooperatives.
Keywords: firm growth; Gibrat's law; system generalised method of moments
Published: January 31, 2020 Show citation
References
- Barton D., Boland M., Chaddad F., Eversull E. (2011): Current challenges in financing agricultural cooperatives. Choices, 26.
- Chaddad F., Cook M., Heckelei T. (2005): Testing for the presence of financial constraints in US agricultural cooperatives: An investment behavior approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56: 385-397.
Go to original source... - Chang Y., Chou R.K., Huang T. (2014): Corporate governance and the dynamics of capital structure: New evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48: 374-385. Go to original source...
- CoBank (2015): Member Cooperative Financial Data, 2011-2015. [Unpublished proprietary dataset]. CoBank, Greenwood Village, CO, USA.
- Fagiolo G., Luzzi A. (2006): Do liquidity constraints matter in explaining firm size and growth? Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15: 1-39. Go to original source...
- Faulkender M., Petersen M. (2012): Investment and capital constraints: Repatriations under the American Jobs Creation Act. The Review of Financial Studies, 25: 3351-3388. Go to original source...
- Fulton M.E., Fulton J.R., Clark J.S., Parliament C. (1995): Cooperative growth: Is it constrained? Agribusiness, 11: 245-261. Go to original source...
- Lerman Z., Parliament C. (1990): Comparative performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms in US food industries. Agribusiness, 6: 527-540. Go to original source...
- Lerman Z., Parliament C. (1993): Financing growth in agricultural cooperatives. Review of Agricultural Economics, 15: 431-441. Go to original source...
- Li Z., Jacobs K.L., Georgeanne M.A. (2015): The cooperative capital constraint revisited. Agricultural Finance Review, 75: 253-266. Go to original source...
- Oliveira B., Fortunato A. (2006): Firm growth and liquidity constraints: A dynamic analysis. Small Business Economics, 27: 139-156. Go to original source...
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (2014): Agricultural Cooperative Statistics 2012-2014. [Dataset]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
- Wang Y. (2016): The optimal capital structure in agricultural cooperatives under the revolving fund cycles. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 62: 45-50. Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.