Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(7):299-306 | DOI: 10.17221/290/2018-AGRICECON

Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectivenessOriginal Paper

Bazyli Czyżewski1, Anna Matuszczak*,2, Andreea Muntean3
1 University of Applied Sciences in Piła, Faculty of Economics, Poland
2 Poznan University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics, Poznan, Poland
3 Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Alba Iulia, Alba Iulia, Romania

The main goal of the article is to compare three approaches to measuring environmental sustainability in agriculture: i) the environmental burden index; ii) the sustainable value of eco-efficient production; and iii) the sustainable value of the eco-effective farm, applied to the sample of 130 EUFADN (European Union Farm Accountancy Data Network) regions in 2015. The study indicates a fundamental problem: the notion of environmental sustainability in agriculture differs depending on the criterion we apply. We recognized a principle trade-off in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) which consists of compensating for the strain on the natural environment with production or with public goods provision. Studies on these two effects seem to be crucial to draw a consistent development path for the CAP. Our major finding is that public goods-oriented farming is more likely to expand after improving eco-efficiency. This is still a challenge because in European regions, eco-efficient has not meant environmentally sustainable yet.

Keywords: agriculture; environment; EU regions; sustainable development

Published: July 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Czyżewski B, Matuszczak A, Muntean A. Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectiveness. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(7):299-306. doi: 10.17221/290/2018-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Berre D., Vayssières J., Boussemart J.-P., Leleu H., Tillard E., Lecomte P. (2015): A methodology to explore the determinants of eco-efficiency by combining an agronomic whole-farm simulation model and efficient frontier. Environmental Modelling & Software, 71: 46-59. Go to original source...
  2. Bonfiglio A., Arzeni A., Bodini A. (2017): Assessing the ecoefficiency of arable farms in rural areas. Agricultural Systems, 151: 114-125. Go to original source...
  3. Burja C., Burja V. (2016): The economic farm size and sustainable value. Disparities between Romania and the EU states. Annals of the Constantin Brâncuşi University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 2016: 50-57.
  4. Chung-Hsing Yeh D.H., Willis R.J. (2000): Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27: 963-973. Go to original source...
  5. Coelli T.J., Prasada Rao D.S. (2005): Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000. Agricultural Economics, Supplement 1, 32: 115-134. Go to original source...
  6. Czyżewski B., Matuszczak A., Muntean A. (2018): Influence of agricultural policy on the environmental sustainability of European farming. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 19: 426-434.
  7. Czyżewski B., Przekota G., Poczta-Wajda A. (2017): The incidence of agricultural policy on the land market in Poland: Two-dimensional and multilevel analysis. Land Use Policy, 63: 174-185. Go to original source...
  8. Diakoulaki D., Mavrotas G., Papayannakis L. (1995): Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22: 763-770. Go to original source...
  9. EUFADN (2018): European Union Farm Accountancy Data Network. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/ rica/ (accessed April 5, 2018).
  10. EUFADN Poland (2017): European FADN organization, Poland. Available at http://fadn.pl
  11. Figge F., Hahn T. (2005): The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9: 47-58. Go to original source...
  12. Gadanakis Y., Bennett R., Park J., Areal F.J. (2015): Evaluating the sustainable intensification of arable farms. Journal of Environmental Management, 150: 288-298. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Gómez-Limon J.A., Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Reig-Martínez E. (2012): Eco-efficiency assessment of olive farms in Andalusia. Land Use Policy, 29: 395-406. Go to original source...
  14. Hayati D., Karami E. (1996): A proposed scale to measure sustainability at the farm level in socio-economic studies. In: Proceedings First Agricultural Economic Conference of Iran, Zabol, Iran, April 5-7, 1996.
  15. Illge L., Hahn T., Figge F. (2008): Applying and extending the sustainable value method to agriculture - an overview. In: Proceedings 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists - EAAE 2008, EAAE, Ghent, Belgium.
  16. Kates R., Parris T.M., Leiserowitz A.A. (2005): What is sustainable development? Environment, 47: 9-21. Go to original source...
  17. Kuosmanen T., Kortelainen M. (2005): Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9: 59-72. Go to original source...
  18. Latruffe L., Diazabakana A., Bockstaller C., Desjeux Y., Finn J., Kelly E., Ryan M., Uthes S. (2016): Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118: 123-130. Go to original source...
  19. Olper A. (2001): Determinants of Agricultural Protection: The role of democracy and institutional setting. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52: 463-487. Go to original source...
  20. Pérez Urdiales M., Lansink A.O., Wall A. (2016) : Eco-efficiency among dairy farmers: the importance of socio-economic characteristics and farmers' attitudes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64: 559-574. Go to original source...
  21. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Gómez-Limón J.A., Reig-Martínez E. (2011): Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 92: 1154-1164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Beltran-Esteve M., Gomez-Limon J.A. (2012): Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 220: 798-809. Go to original source...
  23. Poczta-Wajda A., Poczta J. (2016): The role of natural conditions in qualified agritourism - the case of Poland. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 62: 167-180. Go to original source...
  24. Reytar K., Hanson C., Henninger N. (2014): Indicators of Sustainable Agriculture: a Scoping Analysis. Working Paper, Installment 6 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.worldresourcesreport.org (accessed April, 2014).
  25. Saltiel J., Baunder J., Palakovich S. (1994): Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: diffusion, farm structure and profitability. Rural Sociology, 59: 333-347. Go to original source...
  26. Schaltegger S., Sturm A. (1990): Ökologische Rationalität. Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung, 44: 273-290.
  27. Schaltegger S. (1996): Corporate Environmental Accounting. Wiley.
  28. Stoate C., Baldi A., Beja P., Boatman N.D., Herzon I., van Doorn A., de Snoo G.R., Rakosy L., Ramwell C. (2009): Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe - a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 22-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. WBCSD (2000): World Business Council for Sustainable Development Eco-Efficiency Facilities: Available Internet: Creating More Value with Less Impact. WBCSD.
  30. van Passel S., Nevens F., Mathijs E., van Huylenbroeck G. (2007): Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecological Economics, 62: 149-161. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.