Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(6):270-277 | DOI: 10.17221/170/2018-AGRICECON

Short and medium-term impact of dairy barn investment on profitability and herd size in SwitzerlandOriginal Paper

Benedikt Kramer*,1,2, Anke Schorr1, Reiner Doluschitz2, Markus Lips1
1 Agroscope, Ettenhausen, Switzerland
2 University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

Investing in larger barns and increasing herd size are crucial milestones in dairy production. Based on the Swiss Farm Accountancy Data Network and data on government-supported investments, we investigate the development of two key variables over the first eight years after investment: change in herd size and calculated profit, that is, farm income minus opportunity costs for family labour and capital. We apply a fixed-effects panel regression and test for autocorrelation present in the time series. Compared to the year before the investment, calculated profit decreases in the first three years, while in the remaining years no significant difference compared to the year before investment can be seen. Herd size increases slowly, predominantly in the second and third years after investment, to some extent explaining the less favourable development of profitability in these years. We conclude that investment in a dairy barn does not lead to improved profitability in the short and medium term, pointing to the question of whether this picture changes in the long term.

Keywords: farm growth; fixed-effects; investment support; opportunity cost quota abolishment

Published: June 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kramer B, Schorr A, Doluschitz R, Lips M. Short and medium-term impact of dairy barn investment on profitability and herd size in Switzerland. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(6):270-277. doi: 10.17221/170/2018-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Baltagi B.H. (2013): Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex. Go to original source...
    2. Bewley J., Palmer R.W., Jackson-Smith D.B. (2001): An overview of experiences of Wisconsin dairy farmers who modernized their operations. Journal of Dairy Science, 84: 717-729. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Bundesrat (1998): Federal Act on Agriculture. Available at https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/19983407/index.html (accessed Feb 20, 2018).
    4. Drukker D. (2003): Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 3: 168-177. Go to original source...
    5. Eidgenössische Finanzkontrolle (2015): Investitionshilfen in der Landwirtschaft - Evaluation der Konzeption, Kosten und Wirksamkeit. Eidgenössische Finanzkontrolle, Bern. (in German)
    6. Faust M.A., Kinsel M.L., Kirkpatrick M.A. (2001): Characterizing biosecurity, health, and culling during dairy herd expansions. Journal of Dairy Science, 84: 955-965. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Gazzarin C., Bloch L., Schneitter O., Lips M. (2008): Wie reagieren Verkehrsmilchbetriebe auf die aktuellen Herausforderungen? Eine repräsentative Umfrage in der Ostschweiz vor Aufhebung der Milchkontingentierung. Agroscope, Tänikon. (in German)
    8. Giesselmann M., Windzio M. (2012): Regressionsmodelle zur Analyse von Paneldaten. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. (in German) Go to original source...
    9. Haller T. (2014): Abolition of the milk quota system in Switzerland - assessment of the quota abolition and its impact in consideration of accompanying measures. Study commissioned by the European Milk Board. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern. Available at http://www.europeanmilkboard.org/fileadmin/Dokumente/Press_Release/EMB-allgemein/2014/Study_Switzerland_milk_quota_EN.pdf (accessed May 9, 2018).
    10. Hoop D., Mack G., Mann S., Schmid D. (2014): On the dynamics of agricultural labour input and their impact on productivity and income: an empirical study of Swiss family farms. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 3: 221-231.
    11. Hoop D., Schmid D. (2015): Grundlagenbericht 2014 - zentrale Auswertung von Buchhaltungsdaten. Agroscope, Tänikon. Available at https://www.agroscope.admin.ch/agroscope/de/home/themen/wirtschaft-technik/betriebswirtschaft/za-bh/grundlagenbericht.html (accessed Sept 13, 2017).
    12. Hoop D., Zorn A., Lips M., Gazzarin C. (2015): Determinants of Full Costs of Dairy Production in Switzerland - a Comparison of two Disproportionate Joint Costs Allocations. International Farm Management Association, Laval University, Québec City.
    13. Hüttel S., Jongeneel R. (2011): How has the EU milk quota affected patterns of herd-size change? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38: 497-527. Go to original source...
    14. Jan P., Lips M., Gazzarin C. (2005): Betriebstypologie für Milchwirtschaftsbetriebe im Berggebiet. AGRARForschung, 12: 120-125. (in German)
    15. Kahnemann D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. (1991): Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 193-206. Go to original source...
    16. Kirchweger S., Kantelhardt J. (2015): The dynamic effects of government-supported farm-investment activities on structural change in Austrian agriculture. Land Use Policy, 48: 73-93. Go to original source...
    17. Lips M., Gazzarin C., Telser H. (2016): Job preferences of dairy farmers in Eastern Switzerland: a discrete choice experiment. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65: 254-261. Go to original source...
    18. MAPIS data (2017): MAPIS data. Federal Office of Agriculture (FOAG), Bern, Switzerland.
    19. Meyre S. (2016). Food and Agriculture - Pocket Statistics 2017. Federal Statistical Office, Neuchâtel.
    20. Olsen J.V., Lund M. (2009): Incentives and Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Investment Behaviour in Agriculture. International Farm Management Association, Bloomington/Normal, Illinois.
    21. Petersen M.A. (2009): Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22: 435-480. Go to original source...
    22. Pietola K., Heikkilä A.-M. (2005): Switching toward capitalintensive technologies in Finnish dairy farms. Agricultural Economics, 33: 381-387. Go to original source...
    23. Salvioni C., Sciulli D. (2011): Farm Level Impact of Rural Development Policy: a Conditional Difference in Difference Matching Approach. European Association of Agricultural Economics, Ancona.
    24. Samson G., Gardebroek C., Jongeneel R. (2016): Explaining production expansion decisions of Dutch dairy farmers. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 76: 87-98. Go to original source...
    25. Sauer J., Zilberman D. (2012): Sequential technology implementation, network externalities, and risk: the case of automatic milking. Agricultural Economics, 43: 233-251. Go to original source...
    26. Schick M., Hartmann W. (2005): Arbeitszeitbedarfswerte in der Milchviehhaltung. Landtechnik, 60: 226-227. (in German)
    27. Spicka J., Krause J. (2013): Selected socioeconomic impacts of public support for agricultural biogas plants: The case of the Czech Republic. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19: 929-939.
    28. Stahl T.J., Conlin B.J., Seykora A.J., Steuernagel G.R. (1999): Characteristics of Minnesota dairy farms that significantly increased milk production from 1989-1993. Journal of Dairy Science, 82: 45-51. Go to original source...
    29. Swiss FADN data (2017): Swiss FADN data. Agroscope, Tänikon.
    30. Verbeek M. (2012): A Guide to Modern Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content