Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(5):203-211 | DOI: 10.17221/202/2018-AGRICECON

Innovative approaches to management with emphasis on soft factors and their impact on the efficiency of agribusiness companiesOriginal Paper

Nadežda Jankelová*, Katarína Remeňová, Zuzana Skorková, Ildikó Némethová
University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

This paper represents a wider research aimed at the examination of innovative approaches to management and their impact on the competitiveness and success of companies in a globalised world economy. Its main objective is to evaluate perceived importance of these approaches with emphasis on soft factors in agribusiness companies in Slovakia in terms of methods and tools used in the implementation of individual management functions, as well as in terms of the frequency of their applications, and their impact on the efficiency of these companies. However, a research gap has been identified in the existing literature on primary agribusiness companies. To improve their position, farmers should not only passively respond to many external factors that are of course important in this sector but should also be proactive and innovative in their management methods and practices. A questionnaire research has been conducted in agribusiness companies in Slovakia. The obtained results highlight the significance of hard factors in the utilisation of management tools. Moreover, soft factors have positively affected economic results. Innovativeness has been identified in leadership functions, where a significant link has been found between the transformation style of leadership and the importance of soft factors in transformational management.

Keywords: agribusiness company; efficiency; hard factors in management; innovative approaches to management; soft factors in management

Published: May 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jankelová N, Remeňová K, Skorková Z, Némethová I. Innovative approaches to management with emphasis on soft factors and their impact on the efficiency of agribusiness companies. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(5):203-211. doi: 10.17221/202/2018-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Abdullah M.B., Uli J., Tari J.J. (2009): The relationship of performance with soft factors and quality improvement. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20: 735-748. Go to original source...
  2. Agarwal S., Rahman S., Errington A. (2009): Measuring the determinants of relative economic performance of rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 25: 309-321. Go to original source...
  3. Beer M. (2009): High Commitment, High Performance: How to Build a Resilient Organization for Sustained Advantage. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco.
  4. Breene R.T.S., Nunes P.F. (2011): Reinvent your business before it's too late. Harvard Business Review, 89: 80-87.
  5. Bóna P., Lippert R. (2015): The effect of hard and soft factors on the success of a company. Problems of Management in the 21st century, 10: 6-17. Go to original source...
  6. Calvo-Mora A., Picón A., Ruiz C., Cauzo L. (2013): The relationships between soft-hard TQM factors and key business results. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34: 115-143. Go to original source...
  7. Chan W.S., Ahmad M.F., Kong M.W. (2017): The impact of soft factors on quality improvement in manufacturing industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226: 12025. Go to original source...
  8. Contó F., Fiore M., La Sala P., Papapietro P. (2012): The role of education, knowledge and human resources for the agricultural development in the perspective of new CAP: an hypothesis of change in Basilicata. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 1-2: 123-129. Egner T. (2009): McKinsey Seven S Model. Grin Verlag, Munich. Go to original source...
  9. Fritzenschaft T. (2013): Critical Success Factors of Change Management, an Empirical Research in German Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Springer Gabler. Go to original source...
  10. Gadenne D., Sharma B. (2009): An investigation of the hard and soft quality management factors of Australian SMEs and their association with firm performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26: 865-880. Go to original source...
  11. Grznár M., Szabo Ľ. (2017): Štrukturálne zmeny vo výrobe a ekonomike virtuálnej farmy na Slovensku. Ekonomika poľnohospodárstva, 1: 96-109. (in Slovak)
  12. Jankelova N., Joniakova Z., Blstakova J., Nemethova I. (2017a): Readiness of human resource departments of agricultural enterprises for implementation of the new roles of human resource professionals. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 63: 461-470. Go to original source...
  13. Jankelova N., Masar D., Moricova S. (2017b): Risk factors in the agriculture sector. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 63: 247-258. Go to original source...
  14. Nasim K. (2018): Role of internal and external organizational factors in TQM implementation: A systematic literature review and theoretical framework. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35: 1014-1033. Go to original source...
  15. Psomas E., Vouzas F., Kafetzopoulos D. (2014): Quality management benefits through the "soft" and "hard" aspect of TQM in food companies. The TQM Journal, 26: 431-444. Go to original source...
  16. Zeng J., Zhang W., Matsui Y., Zhao X. (2017): The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185: 240-51. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.