Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(3):133-142 | DOI: 10.17221/31/2018-AGRICECON

Palm oil spot-futures relation: Evidence from unrefined and refined productsOriginal Paper

You-How Go1, Wee-Yeap Lau*,2
1 Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Perak, Malaysia
2 University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

This study examines the palm oil spot-futures relation in terms of mean and volatility spillovers from 2010 to 2018. Based on the cross-correlation function of standardised residuals and its squared residuals, our results show: first, crude palm oil (CPO) futures returns Granger cause refined palm oil, palm stearin and palm olein spot returns. Second, refined palm kernel oil spot returns Granger cause crude palm kernel oil futures returns in mean and variance. Third, CPO spot and refined palm olein futures returns are independent; and fourth, there is volatility spillover from CPO futures market to refined palm oil spot market within longer time. These findings suggest that refiners can use CPO futures returns instead of crude palm kernel oil futures returns for predicting the future spot return of refined palm oil products. To lock in purchasing price of unrefined palm oil products, the producers can rely on the spot volatility to decide the optimal number of crude palm kernel oil futures contracts.

Keywords: causality in mean; causality in variance; crude palm oil; palm kernel oil; spot-futures relation

Published: March 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Go Y, Lau W. Palm oil spot-futures relation: Evidence from unrefined and refined products. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(3):133-142. doi: 10.17221/31/2018-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Alquist R., Kilian L. (2010): What do we learn from the price of crude oil futures? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25: 539-573. Go to original source...
  2. Alzahrani M., Masih M., Al-Titi O. (2014): Linear and nonlinear Granger causality between oil spot and futures prices: a wavelet-based test. Journal of International Money and Finance, 48: 175-201. Go to original source...
  3. Asche F., Gjølberg O., Völker T. (2003): Price relationships in the petroleum market: an analysis of crude oil and refined product prices. Energy Economics, 25: 289-301. Go to original source...
  4. Balcilar M., Gungor H., Hammoudeh S. (2015): The timevarying causality between spot and futures crude oil prices: a regime switching approach. International Review of Economics & Finance, 40: 51-71. Go to original source...
  5. Bhar R., Hamori S. (2005): Causality in variance and the type of traders in crude oil futures. Energy Economics, 27: 527-539. Go to original source...
  6. Box G.E.P., Tiao G.C. (1973): Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
  7. Brennan M.J. (1958): The supply of storage. American Economic Review, 40: 50-72. Go to original source...
  8. Brenner R.J., Kroner K.F. (1995): Arbitrage, cointegration, and testing the unbiasedness hypothesis in financial markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30: 23-42. Go to original source...
  9. Bursa Malaysia (2018): Market Statistics. Bursa Malaysia Berhad. Available at http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/derivatives/market-statistics/historical-data
  10. Chen P.F., Lee C.C., Zeng J.H. (2014): The relationship between spot and futures oil prices: do structural breaks matter? Energy Economics, 43: 206-217. Go to original source...
  11. Cheung Y.W., Ng L.K. (1996): A causality-in-variance test and its application to financial market prices. Journal of Econometrics, 72: 33-48. Go to original source...
  12. Choi K., Hammoudeh S. (2009): Long memory in oil and refined products markets. Energy Journal, 30: 97-116. Go to original source...
  13. Fernandez V. (2015): Spot and futures markets linkages: does contango differ from backwardation? Journal of Futures Markets, 36: 375-396. Go to original source...
  14. Fernandez V. (2016): Further evidence on the relationship between spot and futures prices. Resources Policy, 49: 368-371. Go to original source...
  15. Ghoddusi H. (2016): Integration of physical and futures prices in the US natural gas market. Energy Economics, 56: 229-238. Go to original source...
  16. Go Y.H., Lau W.Y. (2014): Evaluating the hedging effectiveness in crude palm oil futures market: a bivariate threshold GARCH model. Empirical Economics Letters, 13: 1159-1170.
  17. Go Y.H., Lau W.Y. (2015): Evaluating the hedging effectiveness in crude palm oil futures market during financial crises. Journal of Asset Management, 16: 52-69. Go to original source...
  18. Go Y.H., Lau W.Y. (2017): Investor demand, market efficiency and spot-futures relation: further evidence from crude palm oil. Resources Policy, 53: 135-146. Go to original source...
  19. Gulley A., Tilton J.E. (2014): The relationship between spot and futures prices: an empirical analysis. Resources Policy, 41: 109-112. Go to original source...
  20. Henry Ó.T., Olekalns N., Lakshman R.W. (2007): Identifying interdependencies between South-East Asian stock markets: a non-linear approach. Australian Economic Papers, 46: 122-135. Go to original source...
  21. Hong Y. (2001): A test for volatility spillover with application to exchange rate. Journal of Econometrics, 103: 183-224. Go to original source...
  22. Ji Q., Fan Y. (2011): A dynamic hedging approach for refineries in multiproduct oil markets. Energy, 36: 881-887. Go to original source...
  23. Kaldor N. (1939): Speculation and economic stability. Review of Economic Studies, 7: 1-27. Go to original source...
  24. Kawamoto K., Hamori S. (2011): Market efficiency among futures with different maturities: evidence from the crude oil futures market. Journal of Futures Markets, 31: 487-501. Go to original source...
  25. Kolodziej M., Kaufmann R.K. (2013): The role of trader positions in spot and futures prices for WTI. Energy Economics, 40: 176-182. Go to original source...
  26. Liu Y.S., Chen L., Su C.W. (2011): The price correlation between crude oil spot and futures: evidence from rank test. Energy Procedia, 5: 998-1002. Go to original source...
  27. Liu L., Ma G. (2014): Cross-correlation between crude oil and refined product prices. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 413: 284-293. Go to original source...
  28. Mahalik M.K., Acharya D., Babu M.S. (2014): Price discovery and volatility spillovers in futures and spot commodity markets: some Indian evidence. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11: 211-226. Go to original source...
  29. Mirantes A.G., Población J., Serna G. (2012): Analyzing the dynamics of the refining margin: implications for valuation and hedging. Quantitative Finance, 12: 1839-1855. Go to original source...
  30. Nakajima T., Hamori S. (2012): Causality-in-mean and causality-in-variance among electricity prices, crude oil prices, and Yen-US Dollar exchange rates in Japan. Research in International Business and Finance, 26: 371-386. Go to original source...
  31. Nelson D.B. (1991): Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 347-370. Go to original source...
  32. Ruan Q., Huang Y., Jiang W. (2016): The exceedance and cross-correlations between the gold spot and futures markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 463: 139-151. Go to original source...
  33. Tilton J.E., Humphreys D., Radetzki M. (2011): Investor demand and spot commodity prices. Resources Policy, 36: 187-195. Go to original source...
  34. Toyoshima Y., Nakajima T., Hamori S. (2013): Crude oil hedging strategy: new evidence from the data of the financial crisis. Applied Financial Economics, 23: 1033-1041. Go to original source...
  35. Working H. (1949): The theory of price of storage. American Economic Review, 39: 1254-1262.
  36. Zhong M., Darrat A.F., Otero R. (2004): Price discovery and volatility spillovers in index futures markets: Some evidence from Mexico. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28: 3037-3054. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.