Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(1):10-20 | DOI: 10.17221/24/2018-AGRICECON

Regional heterogeneity among non-operating earnings quality, stock returns, and firm value in biotech industryOriginal Paper

Joe-Ming Lee*
Department of Applied Economics, Fo Guang University, Jiaosi Shiang, Yilan County, Taiwan

This paper analyses regional heterogeneity under the discretionary measures of non-operating earnings quality and stock returns on firm value in Taiwan's biotech industry during 2008-2015. An econometric framework based on panel smooth transition regression models is employed in a non-linear panel data model. The results show that biotech firms near the bottom threshold for operating income have low-quality non-operating earnings and those near the upper threshold demonstrate the opposite. Investors who exclusively focus on stock returns are thus likely to miss important information about the quality of earnings.

Keywords: biotech industry; firm value; non-operating earnings; panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) models; regional heterogeneity; stock returns

Published: January 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lee J. Regional heterogeneity among non-operating earnings quality, stock returns, and firm value in biotech industry. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(1):10-20. doi: 10.17221/24/2018-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Graham J.R., Harvey C.R., Rajgopal S. (2005): The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40: 3-73. Go to original source...
  2. Gonzalez A., Teräsvirta T., van Dijk D.V. (2005): Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance. Stockholm School of Economics No. 604.
  3. Hansen B.E. (1999): Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93: 345-368. Go to original source...
  4. Healy P.M., Wahlen J.M. (1999): A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13: 365-383. Go to original source...
  5. Houge T., Loughran T. (2000): Cash flow is king: Cognitive errors by investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1: 161-175. Go to original source...
  6. Jian M., Wong T.J. (2004): Earnings Management and Tunneling through Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Groups. Working paper. Nanyang Technological University and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
  7. Lambert R., Verrecchia R. (2011): Cost of Capital in Imperfect Competition Settings. Working Paper. University of Pennsylvania.
  8. Lindenberg E.B., Ross S.A. (1981): Tobin's q ratio and industrial organisation. Journal of Business, 54: 1-32. Go to original source...
  9. Rajgopal S., Venkatachalam M. (2011): Financial reporting quality and idiosyncractic volatility over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51: 1-20. Go to original source...
  10. Skinner D.J., Sloan R.G. (2002): Earnings surprises, growth expectations and stock returns or don't let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies, 7: 289-312. Go to original source...
  11. Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) (2018): Taiwan Economic Journal database. Taiwan Economic Journal Co. Ltd. Available at http://www.finasia.biz/ensite/Database/tabid/92/language/en-US/Default.aspx

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.