Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(9):399-411 | DOI: 10.17221/399/2016-AGRICECON

Changes in the Czech agrarian foreign trade competitiveness - different groups of partners' specificsOriginal Paper

Lubos SMUTKA*, Mansoor MAITAH, Miroslav SVATOS
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The territorial and commodity structure of the Czech agrarian foreign trade underwent significant changes over the last fifteen years. These changes affected not only the structure, but also the value, volume, unit prices and competitiveness. The presented paper provides the basic overview of the individual significant changes. The main goal of the paper is to specify changes in the area of the Czech agrarian foreign trade competitiveness. This competitiveness is analysed not only in relation to global markets, but it is also analysed in relation to different groups of countries. Differences in competiveness are analysed in relation to the European Union (EU 28), the Commonwealth of Independent Countries, other European countries, the OECD members, and developing countries. In addition, competitiveness is also analysed in two specific dimensions. The agricultural market represents a very specific entity. However, the global merchandise trade is becoming more and more liberalized internationally and the regional agricultural markets are still being affected by a significant protectionism. The individual countries and certain clusters of countries are applying an intensive agricultural market protection. The result of these policies is a distortion of the agricultural trade. This distortion is also affecting the individual countries mutual competitiveness. While one country could be competitive in relation to one partner, in relation to other partner, the competitiveness could be limited. The paper clarifies and analyses the differences that exist in the competitiveness of the Czech agrarian trade in relation to the above mentioned groups of countries. The analysis is conducted utilizing the symmetric revealed comparative advantage index and the Lafay index, the Trade Balance index and the product mapping. The Czech agrarian trade territorial structure has become more concentrated, the commodity structure became more diversified. Czech trade is quite competitive especially in relation to the European countries, the competitiveness in relation to other territories is limited. The significant weakness of the Czech agrarian trade is its low ability to generate added value.

Keywords: agricultural and foodstuff products, agri-food trade, competitiveness, changes, Czech Republic, partners, regional and inter-regional trade, structure, value

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SMUTKA L, MAITAH M, SVATOS M. Changes in the Czech agrarian foreign trade competitiveness - different groups of partners' specifics. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(9):399-411. doi: 10.17221/399/2016-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Balassa B. (1965): Trade liberalization and "revealed" comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33: 99-123. Go to original source...
  2. Balassa B. (1977): Revealed' comparative advantage revisited. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 45: 327-44. Go to original source...
  3. Balassa B. (1991): Comparative Advantage, Trade Policy and Economic Development. University Press, New York: 336.
  4. Bašek V., Kraus J. (2009): Czech foreign agricultural trade after joining the European Union. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 583-595. Go to original source...
  5. Burianova J. (2011a): Agrarian foreign trade of the Czech Republic in the period of 2004-2008, competitiveness of commodities. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59: 37-42. Go to original source...
  6. Burianova J. (2011b): Effect of the 2008-2009 economic crisis on the results of agricultural foreign trade of the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 57: 226-231. Go to original source...
  7. Burianova J., Belova A. (2012): The competitiveness of agricultural foreign trade commodities of the CR assessed by way of the Lafay Index. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4: 27-36.
  8. Clark J.S., Smutka L., Cechura L., Maitah M., Prochazka P. (2015): The law of one price and the Czech cereal market integration into the EU common agricultural market. Ekonomický časopis, 63: 817-836.
  9. Csaki C., Nash J. (1999): Regional and international trade policy. World Bank Technical Paper, 434: 1-116.
  10. Dalum B., Laursen K., Villumsen G. (1998): Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: despecialization and 'stickiness'. International Review of Applied Economics, 12: 447-467. Go to original source...
  11. Ferto I., Hubbard L.J. (2003): Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness in Hungarian agri-food sectors. The World Economy, 26: 247-259. Go to original source...
  12. Ferto I. (2008): The evolution of agri-food trade patterns in Central European countries. Post-Communist Economies, 20: 1-10. Go to original source...
  13. Fuller F., Beghin J.C., Fabiosa J., Mohanty S., Fang C., Kaus P. (2002): Accession of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland to the European union: Impacts on agricultural markets. World Economy, 25: 407-428. Go to original source...
  14. Jámbor A. (2014): Determinants of intra-industry agrifood trade in the Visegrad countries. Acta Alimentaria, 43: 246-253. Go to original source...
  15. Kancs D., Ciaian P. (2010): Factor content of bilateral trade: The role of firm heterogeneity and transaction costs. Agricultural Economics, 41: 305-317. Go to original source...
  16. Kennedy P.L., Sonnier G.P. (1997): Economic integration and international agricultural trade: The case of central and eastern Europe. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 9: 57-72. Go to original source...
  17. Lafay G. (1992): The measurement of revealed comparative advantages. In: Dagenais M.G., Muet P.A. (eds): International Trade Modeling. Chapman & Hill, London: 209-234. Go to original source...
  18. Laursen K. (1998): A Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective on the Determinants and Effects of International Trade Specialisation. IKE-Group - Aalborg University, Aalborg.
  19. Lukas Z. (1998): Agricultural reforms in the CEFTA and EU eastern enlargement. MOCT-MOST Economic Policy in Transitional Economics, 8: 143-166. Go to original source...
  20. Pohlova K., Mezera J. (2014): Analysis of development of Czech foreign trade in foods and beverages. Agris OnLine Papers in Economics and Informatics, 6: 121-131.
  21. Presová R., Tvrdoň O., Živělová A. (2008): Importance of intrastat in EU intra-Community trade. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 56: 175-186. Go to original source...
  22. Smutka L., Steininger M., Maitah M., Škubna O. (2015): The Czech agrarian foreign trade - ten years after the EU accession. In: Proceedings of 24th International Scientific Conference on Agrarian Perspectives - Global Agribusiness and the Rural Economy, Prague, Sept 16-18, 2015: 385-392.
  23. Svatos M., Maitah M., Belova A. (2013): World sugar market-basic development trends and tendencies. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5: 73-88.
  24. Svatos M. (2008). Selected trends forming European agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 93-101. Go to original source...
  25. Vollrath T.L. (1991): A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. Review of World Economics, 127: 265-280. Go to original source...
  26. Vozarova I.K., Kotulic R., Sira E. (2015): V4 countries' agricultural sector evaluation in terms of competitive advantage. Economic Annals, 21: 60-63.
  27. Widodo T. (2009): Comparative advantage: theory, empirical measures and case studies. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 4: 57-82. Available at http://rebs.ro/resource/REBS_4/Research%20Paper/Widodo,T_-_Comparative_Advantage_Theory_Empirical_Measures_and_Case_Studies.pdf (accessed Nov 10, 2015).
  28. Zaghini A. (2003): Trade advantages and specialization dynamics in acceding countries. Working Paper No. 249, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main: 4-15. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.