Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(7):328-336 | DOI: 10.17221/376/2016-AGRICECON
Nonlinear Granger causality between grains and livestockOriginal Paper
- 1 Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Torun, Poland
- 2 Department of Applied Informatics and Mathematics in Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Torun, Poland
Linear and nonlinear Granger causality between three grains: corn, soybean, wheat and two livestock commodities: live cattle and lean hogs, was verified. Weak evidence of linear causal relationships was found, supporting the results published in other studies. However, strong nonlinear causal relationships between grain and livestock returns were found, which had not yet been documented in the literature on this subject. The revealed relationships have different patterns and features, and in some cases, they arise from second moment dependencies, but nonlinearities of a different type were also found. Most of the discovered nonlinear relationships are bidirectional.
Keywords: agricultural futures contracts, grain and livestock prices, multivariate GARCH model, nonlinear causality tests
Published: July 31, 2018 Show citation
References
- Al-Ayoubi M., Chikhi M., Terraza M. (2014): The dynamic relationship between oil and wheat markets. Applied Economics and Finance, 1: 116-126.
Go to original source...
- Alzahrani M., Mansur M., Al-Titi O. (2014): Linear and non-linear Granger causality between oil spot and futures prices: A wavelet based test. Journal of International Money and Finance, 48: 175-201.
Go to original source...
- Baek E.G., Brock W.A. (1992): A General Test for Nonlinear Granger Causality: Bivariate Model. Technical report, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin.
- Bampinas G., Panagiotidis T. (2015): On the relationship between oil and gold before and after financial crisis: linear, nonlinear and time-varying causality testing. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19: 657-668.
Go to original source...
- Bekiros S.D. (2014): Exchange rates and fundamentals: co-movement, long-run relationships and short-run dynamics. Journal of Banking & Finance, 39: 117-134.
Go to original source...
- Bekiros S.D., Diks C. (2008): The relationship between crude oil spot and futures prices: Cointegration, linear and nonlinear causality. Energy Economics, 30: 2673-2685.
Go to original source...
- Census of Agriculture 2007 (2009): USDA, Summary and State Data, Volume 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 51.
- Chatrath A., Adrangi B., Dhanda K.K. (2002): Are commodity prices chaotic? Agricultural Economics, 27: 123-137.
Go to original source...
- Diks C., Panchenko V. (2006): A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30: 1647-1669.
Go to original source...
- Diks C., Wolski M. (2016): Nonlinear Granger causality: guidelines for multivariate analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31: 1333-1351.
Go to original source...
- Gallant R., Rossi P., Tauchen G. (1992): Stock prices and volume. Review of Financial Studies, 5: 199-242.
Go to original source...
- Granger C.W.J. (1980): Testing for causality: A personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, 2: 329-352.
Go to original source...
- Hiemstra C., Jones J.D. (1994): Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price volume relation. Journal of Finance, 49: 1639-1664.
Go to original source...
- Holt M.T., Craig L.A. (2006): Nonlinear dynamics and structural change in the U.S. hog-corn cycle: A timevarying STAR approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88: 215-233.
Go to original source...
- Kohzadi N., Boyd M.S. (1995): Testing for chaos and nonlinear dynamics in cattle prices. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 43: 475-484.
Go to original source...
- Kovács S., Huzsvai L., Balogh P. (2013): Investigating the long memory property of the Hungarian market pig prices by using detrended fluctuation analysis. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 4: 1-9.
Go to original source...
- Malcolm S., Aillery M., Weinberg M. (2009): Ethanol and a changing agricultural landscape. Economic Research Report No. 86, Economic Research Service, USDA.
- Nazlioglu S. (2011): World oil and agricultural commodity prices: Evidence from nonlinear causality. Energy Policy, 39: 2935-2943.
Go to original source...
- Pozo V.F., Schroeder T.C. (2012): Price and volatility spillover between livestock and related commodity markets. In: Proceedings of Agricultural & Applied Economics Association's Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington, Aug 12-14, 2012.
- Rosa F., Vasciaveo M. (2012): Agri-commodity price dynamics: the relationship between oil and agricultural market. In: Proceedings of International Association of Agricultural Economists Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, Aug 18-24, 2012.
- Tegle A. (2013): An explorative study of grain and meat price relationships. [Master thesis.] Norwegian University of Life Sciences, UMB School of Economics and Business, Ås.
- Tejeda H.A., Goodwin B.K. (2011): Dynamic price relationships in the grain and cattle markets, pre and post-ethanol mandate. In: Proceedings of Agricultural & Applied Economics Association AAEA & NAREA Joint Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 24-26, 2011.
- Westcott P.C., Hoffman L.A. (1999): Price Determination for Corn and Wheat: The Role of Market Factors and Government Programs. Technical Bulletin No. 1878, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA.
- Xu S., Li Z., Cui L., Dong X., Kong F., Li G. (2012): Price transmission in China's swine industry with an application of MCM. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11: 2097-2106.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.