Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(6):241-255 | DOI: 10.17221/272/2016-AGRICECON

Evaluation of the efficiency of European Union farms: a risk-adjusted return approachOriginal Paper

Vilija ALEKNEVICIENE*,1, Birute STAREVICIUTE1, Egle ALEKNEVICIUTE2
1 Institute of Economics, Accounting and Finance, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Kaunas, Lithuania
2 Department of Finance, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania

The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of EU member-state farms using a risk-adjusted return approach and to determine the impact of subsidies on the efficiency of EU farms. Farm efficiency was analysed by the member-state and by the type of farming and was based on the calculation of Sharpe and Treynor ratios. Systemic risk was expressed by standard deviation in order to estimate the share of systemic risk in the total risk. The change in Sharpe ratios was assessed to determine the impact of subsidies on EU farm efficiency. The results of the risk-adjusted return analysis reveal that farms in the EU-15 were more efficient than farms in the EU-12 in 2004-2013, possibly due to being more experienced in risk management. Nevertheless, the EU-15 did not undertake a bigger share of systemic risk when compared to the EU-12 farms. The impact of financial support on the efficiency of the EU-12 farms was also not stronger when compared to the EU-15 farms.

Keywords: excess return, farm efficiency, Sharpe ratio, systemic risk, total risk, Treynor ratio

Published: June 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ALEKNEVICIENE V, STAREVICIUTE B, ALEKNEVICIUTE E. Evaluation of the efficiency of European Union farms: a risk-adjusted return approach. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(6):241-255. doi: 10.17221/272/2016-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Alekneviciene V. (2010): Comparative analysis of efficiency valuation in agriculture: excess return approach. Economics and Rural Development, 6: 7-13.
  2. Backus G.B.C., Eidman V.R., Dijkhuizen A.A. (1997): Farm decision making under risk and uncertainty. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 45: 307-328. Go to original source...
  3. Beukes P.C., Palliser C.C., Prewer W.E., Levy G., Folkers C., Neal M., Wastney M.E., Thorrold B.S. (2005): Comparing risk for different dairy farm management systems in Taranaki using the Dexcel Whole Farm Model. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 67: 103-107. Go to original source...
  4. Bowman R.G., Bush S.R. (2006): Using comparable companies to estimate the betas of private companies. Journal of Applied Finance, 16: 71-81.
  5. Damodaran A. (2001): Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice. 2 nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  6. Ellahie A. (2014): Firm Fundamentals and Sensitivity to Aggregate Earnings Growth. London Business School, Working paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2757688 (accessed July 25, 2016). Go to original source...
  7. Erb C.B., Harvey C.R. (2006): The strategic and tactical value of commodity futures. Financial Analysis Journal, 62: 1-61. Go to original source...
  8. Eves C., Newell G. (2007): The role of US farmland in real estate portfolios. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 13: 317-327. Go to original source...
  9. Eves C. (2010): NSW rural land performance: 1990-2008. Australasian Agribusiness Review, 18: 85-102.
  10. Gomez-Limon J.A., Arriaza M., Riesgo L. (2003): An MCDM Analysis of Agricultural Risk Aversion. European Journal of Operational Research, 151: 569-585. Go to original source...
  11. Hardaker J.B., Huirne R.B.M., Anderson J.R., Lien G. (2007): Coping with Risk in Agriculture. 2 nd Ed. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire.
  12. Hardaker J.B., Lien. G. (2005): Towards Some Principles of Good Practice for Decision Analysis in Agriculture. Centre for Food Policy. Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Working Paper 2005-1: 1-36.
  13. Harwood J., Heifner R., Coble K., Perry J., Somwaru A. (1999): Managing Risk in Farming: Concepts, Research and Analysis. Agricultural Economic Report 774, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1761672/aer774.pdf (accessed July 28, 2016).
  14. Lambert M., Hubner G. (2013): Comoment risk and stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 23: 191-205. Go to original source...
  15. Leblois A., Quirion P. (2013): Agricultural insurances based on meteorological indices: Realizations, methods and research challenges. Meteorological Applications, 20: 1-9. Go to original source...
  16. Lumby S. (1994): Investment Appraisal and Financial Decisions. 5 th Ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
  17. Macdonald J.M., McBride W.D. (2009): The Transformation of U.S. Livestock Agriculture Scale, Efficiency, and Risks. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Economic Information Bulletin, No. 43. Go to original source...
  18. Manfredo M.R., Richards T.J., McDermott S. (2003): Agricultural cooperatives and risk management: Impact on financial performance. In: American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, July 27-30, 2003.
  19. Martins M.B., Marques C. (2007): Methodological aspects of a mathematical programming model to evaluate soil tillage technologies in a risky environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 177: 556-571. Go to original source...
  20. Matthews A. (2014): FADN Data Highlights Dependence of EU Farms on Subsidy Payments. Available at http://capreform.eu/fadn-data-highlights-dependence-of-eufarms-on-subsidy-payments/ (accessed July 28, 2016).
  21. Neal M., Drynan R., Fulkerson W., Levy G., Wastney M., Post E., Thorrold B., Palliser C., Beukes P., Folkers C. (2005): Optimisation of a whole-farm model. In: Proceedings of the Annual Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Conference, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia, 49: 1-29.
  22. Nydene C., Patrick G.F., Baker T. (1999): The effects of risk management strategies with diversified hog/crop production. In: American Agricultural Economics Association annual meetings, Nashville, Tennessee, August 8-11, 1999.
  23. Pannel D.J., Malcolm B., Kingwell R.S. (2000): Are we risking too much? Perspectives on risk in farm modelling. Agricultural Economics, 23: 69-78. Go to original source...
  24. Roe J.D. (2005): Value Added What?...Horizontal versus Vertical Expansion in Iowa Production Agriculture. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/19570/1/sp05ro10.pdf (accessed July 28, 2016).
  25. Rubio G. (1993): Performance Measurement of Managed Portfolios: a Survey. Investigaciones Economicas Volumen XVII (1) Enero. Available at https://www.fundacionsepi.es/investigacion/revistas/paperArchive/Ene1993/v17i1a1.pdf (accessed 28 July, 2016).
  26. Sipilainen T., Marklun P.O., Huhtala A. (2007): Efficiency in Agricultural Production of Biodiversity: Organic vs. Conventional Practices. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/6478/2/cp08si18.pdf (accessed July 28, 2016).
  27. Suryani A., Herianti E. (2015): The analysis of risk adjusted return portfolio performance share for LQ 45 index in Indonesia stock exchange in 2010-2014 periods. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211: 634-643. Go to original source...
  28. Vedenov D.V., Barnett B.J. (2004): Efficiency of weather derivatives as primary crop insurance instruments. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 29: 387-403.
  29. Wauters E., De Cock L., de Wit J., Lauwers L. (2011): The foregone risk premium: a communicative and practical method for the evaluation of risk-return profiles in agriculture. In: EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty Challenges for Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources ETH Zurich, Zurich, Aug 30-Sept 2, 2011. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/115737/2/Wauters_Erwin_43.pdf (accessed July 28, 2016).
  30. Wilkens K., Zhu J. (2001): Portfolio evaluation and benchmark selection: A mathematical approach. Journal of Alternative Investments, 4: 9-19. Go to original source...
  31. Zgajnar J., Kavcic S. (2010): Efficiency of Risk Reduction on Slovenian Livestock Farms: Whole-farm Planning Approach. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16: 500-511.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.