Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(4):163-169 | DOI: 10.17221/224/2016-AGRICECON

Agricultural R&D, spatial spillover and regional economic growth in different R&D sectors of performance: evidence from a spatial panel in regions of the EU-28Original Paper

Shahrzad ANOUSHEH1, Kambiz HOJABR-KIANI*,1, Ahmad MOJTAHED2,3, Homayoun RANJBAR3
1 Department of Economic, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Economic, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Economic, I.A.U. Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

Agricultural R&D has been identified as an important determinant of economic output in the agricultural sector. Surprisingly, in previous studies, spatial spillover associated with R&D spending in the agricultural sector has not been taken into account. This paper investigates the effects of spatial spillover of agricultural R&D on regional economic growth across EU-28 NUTS-II regions in the period 1995-2014. In particular, we extend previous studies by considering spillover in all sectors of agricultural R&D performance including business enterprise, government and higher education. The spatial Durbin panel data model is employed to estimate brooders effect including direct and indirect effects. Empirical results show a positive effect of agricultural R&D and its spatial spillover on regional growth in all performance sectors. Moreover, the impact of spatial spillover of agricultural R&D on regional growth depends on the performance of the R&D sectors; positive spillovers are stronger in the business enterprise sector. Finally, the interaction effect between the economic output of the agricultural sector of each region with that of its neighbours is significantly positive.

Keywords: agricultural output, panel data, spatial Durbin model

Published: April 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ANOUSHEH S, HOJABR-KIANI K, MOJTAHED A, RANJBAR H. Agricultural R&D, spatial spillover and regional economic growth in different R&D sectors of performance: evidence from a spatial panel in regions of the EU-28. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(4):163-169. doi: 10.17221/224/2016-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D., Feldman M.P. (1994): R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100: 336-367. Go to original source...
  2. Acs Z.J., Audrestch D.B., Feldman M.P. (2004): R&D spillovers and innovative activity. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15: 131-138. Go to original source...
  3. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992): A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60: 323-351. Go to original source...
  4. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1998): Endogenous Growth Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  5. Anselin L. (1988a): Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Go to original source...
  6. Anselin L. (1988b): Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Journal of Geographical Analysis, 20: 1-17. Go to original source...
  7. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. (1997): Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422-448. Go to original source...
  8. Armstrong H.W. (1995): Convergence among regions of the European Union, 1950-1990. Regional Science, 74: 143-152. Go to original source...
  9. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. (2004): Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Elsevier: 2713-2739. Go to original source...
  10. Alston J.M., Pardey P.G., Smith V.H. (1999): Paying for Agricultural Productivity. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  11. Bernat A. (1996): Does manufacturing matter? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor's laws. Journal of Regional Science, 36: 463-477. Go to original source...
  12. Bronzini R., Piselli P. (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: The role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39: 187-199. Go to original source...
  13. Bottazi L., Peri G. (1999): Innovation, Demand and Knowledge Spillovers: Theory and Evidence from European Regions. CEPR Discussion Papers No. 2279, London. Go to original source...
  14. Branstetter L.G. (2001): Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan. Journal of International Economics, 1: 53-79. Go to original source...
  15. Burridge P. (1980): On the Cliff-Ord test for spatial autocorrelation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 42: 107-108. Go to original source...
  16. Carlino G., Mills L. (1993): Are U.S. regional incomes converging? A time series analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32: 335-346. Go to original source...
  17. Carlino G., Mills L. (1996): Convergence and the US States: a time series analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 36: 597-616. Go to original source...
  18. Carr D.L., Markusen J.R., Maskus K.E. (2001): Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. American Economic Review, 91: 693-708. Go to original source...
  19. Chatterji M., Dewhurst J. (1996): Convergence clubs and relative economic performance in Great Britain: 1977- 1991. Regional Studies, 30: 31-40. Go to original source...
  20. Coe D.T., Helpmen E., Hoffmaister W.H. (1997): Northsouth R&D spillovers. The Economic Journal, 107: 13-49. Go to original source...
  21. Coe D., Helpman E. (1995): International R&D spillover. European Economic Review, 39: 859-887. Go to original source...
  22. Crispolti V., Marconi D. (2005). Technology transfer and economic growth in developing countries: an econometric analysis. Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) No. 564, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  23. Eaton J., Kortum S. (1999): International technology diffusion: theory and measurement. International Economic Review, 40: 537-570. Go to original source...
  24. Elhorst J.P. (2010): Dynamic panels with endogenous interactions when T is small. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40: 272-282. Go to original source...
  25. Elhorst J.P. (2014): Spatial Econometrics: From CrossSectional Data to Spatial Panels. Springer, Heidelberg. Go to original source...
  26. Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1991): Innovation and Growth in the Global Econom. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  27. Frantzen D. (2002): Cross-sector and cross-country technical knowledge spillovers and the evolution of manufacturing productivity: a panel data analysis. Economie Appliquée, 55: 31-62. Go to original source...
  28. Funke M., Niebuhr A. (2005): Regional geographic research and development spillovers and economic growth. Regional Studies, 39: 143-153. Go to original source...
  29. Howitt P. (2000): Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. American Economic Review, 90: 829-846. Go to original source...
  30. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. (1993): Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63: 577-598. Go to original source...
  31. Jones C.I. (1995): R&D-based models of economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 103: 759-784. Go to original source...
  32. Keller W. (2000): Do trade patterns and technology flows affect productivity growth. World Bank Economic Review, 14: 17-47. Go to original source...
  33. Keller W. (2002): Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 92: 120-142. Go to original source...
  34. Krugman P. (1998): What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14: 7-17. Go to original source...
  35. LeSage J.P., Pace R.K. (2009): Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press, Taylor. Go to original source...
  36. Neven D., Gouyette C.(1995): Regional convergence in the European Community. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33: 47-65. Go to original source...
  37. Rivera-Batiz L.A., Romer P.M. (1991): Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 531-555. Go to original source...
  38. Romer P. (1990): Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 71-102. Go to original source...
  39. Sala-i-Martin X. (1996): Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40: 1325-1352. Go to original source...
  40. Van Pottelsberghe de La Potterie B., Lichtenberg F. (2001): Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83: 353-378. Go to original source...
  41. Xu B., Wang J. (1999): Capital goods trade and R&D spillovers in the OECD. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32: 1258-1274. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.