Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(4):149-162 | DOI: 10.17221/13/2016-AGRICECON

Utilisation of the natural potential of rural areas for social inclusionOriginal Paper

Jakub HUSÁK, Helena HUDEČKOVÁ
Department of Humanities, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper presents selected results of the sociological research focused on social inclusive activities that use and are located in the natural environment of rural areas. The paper is based on the contemporary form of the concept of a fully integrated modern society, and deals with the implementation of this concept within the strategy of social inclusion in both the European and Czech context. The authors have created, based on secondary research, a typology of social inclusive activities within Czech rural areas. Primary research, consisting of a questionnaire survey, was used to study the awareness of these issues among the rural population. Based on the selected results of both the primary and secondary research, the authors conclude that a possible path to social inclusion, is, alongside specific social services, social farming, which harmonizes the potential of the rural natural environment with the attitudes of the rural population (the actors and observers of social inclusive activities within their locality).The ongoing research is focused on monitoring barriers to the development of this business sector, which are crucial for the rural actors.

Keywords: inclusive activities, local natural potential, rural municipalities, social exclusion

Published: April 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HUSÁK J, HUDEČKOVÁ H. Utilisation of the natural potential of rural areas for social inclusion. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(4):149-162. doi: 10.17221/13/2016-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Alston M., Kent J. (2009): Generation X-pendable the social exclusion of rural and remote young people. Journal of Sociology, 45: 89-107. Go to original source...
  2. Andersen J. (1999): Post-industrial solidarity or meritocracy? Acta Sociologica, 42: 375-385. Go to original source...
  3. Atkinson R. (2000): Občanství a boj proti sociální exkluzi v kontextu reformy sociálního státu. In: Sborník prací Fakulty sociálních studií brněnské univerzity. Sociální studia 5, Brno.
  4. Bauman Z. (2000): Liquid Modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  5. Bauman Z. (2004): Individualizovaná společnost. Mladá fronta, Praha.
  6. Beck U. (1992): Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London.
  7. Bourdieu P (2001): Contre-feux 2 (Pour un mouvement social européen). Liber-raison d´agir, Paris.
  8. Byrne D. (1997): Social exlusion and capitalism: the reserve army across space and time. Critical Social Policy, 17: 27-51. Go to original source...
  9. Cousins C. (1998): Social exlusion in Europe: Paradigms of social disadvantage in Germany, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Policy and Politics, 26: 127-146. Go to original source...
  10. Fazzi L. (2011): Social cooperatives and social farming in Italy. Sociologia Ruralis, 51: 119-136. Go to original source...
  11. Geddes M., Benington J. (2001): Social exclusion and partnership in the European Union. In: Geddes M., Benington J. (eds): Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union. Routledge, London.
  12. Giddens A (2001): Třetí cesta. Mladá fronta, Praha.
  13. Gray J. (2000): Inclusion. A radical critique. In: Askonas P., Stewart A. (eds): Social Inclusion - Possibilities and Tensions. Palgrave, Houndsmills.
  14. Havlíková J. (2012): Mezigenerační vzájemná výpomoc v českých rodinách vyššího věku a její srovnání s vybranými evropskými zeměmi. Sociální práce, 12: 102-112.
  15. Levitas R. (1996): The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy, 16: 5-20. Go to original source...
  16. Levitas R. (1998): The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Macmillan, Houndsmills.
  17. Luhman N. (2000): Art as Social System. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  18. Majerová V. et al. (2006): Český venkov 2006: Sociální mobilita a kvalita života venkovské populace. ČZU, Praha.
  19. Majerová V. et al. (2009): Český venkov 2008: Proměny venkova. ČZU, Praha.
  20. Mareš P., Sirovátka T. (2008): Social exclusion and social inclusion - concepts, discourse, agenda. Czech Sociological Review, 44: 271-294. Go to original source...
  21. Mareš P. (2006): Pojetí konceptu sociálního vyloučení a sociálního začleňování v akademickém diskursu a veřejně politické agendě. In: Mareš P., Rákoczyová M., Sirovátka T. (eds): Sociální vyloučení a sociální začleňování v České republice jako veřejně politická agenda. CESES FSV UK, Praha.
  22. Milbourne P., Doheny S. (2012): Older people and poverty in rural Britain: Material hardships, cultural denials and social inclusions. Journal of Rural Studies, 28: 389-397. Go to original source...
  23. Mincyte D. (2011): Subsistence and sustainability in postindustrial Europe: The politics of small-scale farming in Europeanising Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis, 51: 101-118. Go to original source...
  24. MLSA (2014): Strategie sociálního začleňování 2014-2020. MPSV, Praha.
  25. Novo-Corti I., Varela-Candamio L., García-Alvaret M.T. (2014): Breaking the walls of social exclusion of women rural by means of ICTs: The case of 'digital divides' in Galician. Computers in Human Behavior, 30: 497-507. Go to original source...
  26. Philip L.J., Shusksmith M. (2003): Conceptualizing social exclusion in rural Britain. European Planning Studies, 11: 461-480. Go to original source...
  27. Potůček M. (2006): Evropské a národní strategie sociálního začleňování - teorie a praxe. In: Sirovátka T. (ed.): Sociální vyloučení a sociální politika. Masarykova univerzita, Brno.
  28. Rákoczyová M. (2006): Srovnání národních akčních plánů sociálního začleňování v zemích EU a v České republice. In: Mareš P., Rákoczyová M., Sirovátka T. (eds): Sociální vyloučení a sociální začleňování v České republice jako veřejně politická agenda. CESES FSV UK, Praha.
  29. Reimer B. (2004): Social exclusion in a comparative context. Sociologia Ruralis, 44: 76-94. Go to original source...
  30. Room G. (1999): Social exclusion, solidarity and the challenge of globalisation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8: 166-174. Go to original source...
  31. Shergold I., Parkhurst G. (2012): Transport-related social exclusion amongst older people in rural Southwest England and Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 28: 412-421. Go to original source...
  32. Shortall S. (2004): Social or economic goals, civic inclusion or exclusion? An analysis of rural development theory and practice. Sociologia Ruralis, 44: 109-123. Go to original source...
  33. Shortall S. (2008): Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies, 24: 450-457. Go to original source...
  34. Shortall S., Warner M.E. (2010): Social inclusion or market competitiveness? A comparison of rural development policies in the European Union and the United States. Social Policy & Administration, 44: 575-597. Go to original source...
  35. Shucksmith M. (2012): Class, power and inequality in rural areas: beyond social exclusion? Sociologia Ruralis, 52: 1-21. Go to original source...
  36. Silver H. (1994): Social exclusion and social solidarity: three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133: 531-578.
  37. Synková H. (2014): Identifikace sociálního vyloučení v obcích a regionech. Agentura pro sociální začleňování, Praha.
  38. Warburton J., Cowan S., Winterton R., Hodgkins S. (2014): Building social inclusion for rural older people using information and communication technologies: perspectives of rural practitioners. Australian Social Work, 67: 479-494. Go to original source...
  39. Williamson A.P., Beattie R.S., Osborne S.P. (2004): Addressing fragmentation and social exclusion through community involvement in rural regeneration partnerships: evidence from the Northern Ireland experience. Policy & Politics, 32: 351-369. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.