Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(3):115-130 | DOI: 10.17221/73/2016-AGRICECON

Rural development policy in Italy: the impact of growth-oriented measures on farm outcomesOriginal Paper

Cristina SALVIONI*, Dario SCIULLI
Department of Economic Studies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy

Growth-oriented measures of the EU's rural development policy have been promoted to meet the aims of the Lisbon strategy. This article assesses their impact on performance-related variables of farms. We apply a conditional difference-in-differences approach to the 2003-2007 Italian FADN survey. No evidence emerges to indicate any impact of the measures on farm income, employment or partial productivities. Conversely, participation in the selected policy schemes resulted initially in a productivity increase and, subsequently, in enhanced farm performance. We argue that participation in the growth-oriented measures gave rise to a process of capital deepening that, in turn, elicited a productivity increase and, eventually, positive growth rates in farm performance. The estimated variations in capital intensity signal that the measures resulted in the activation of channels that are expected to positively affect farm performance after a time lag.

Keywords: AP, farm support, rural development policy, treatment effect

Published: March 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SALVIONI C, SCIULLI D. Rural development policy in Italy: the impact of growth-oriented measures on farm outcomes. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(3):115-130. doi: 10.17221/73/2016-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ahituv A., Kimhi A. (2002): Off-farm work and capital accumulation decisions of farmers over the life-cycle: the role of heterogeneity and state dependence. Journal of Development Economics, 68: 329-353. Go to original source...
    2. Benjamin C., Phimister E. (2002): Does capital market structure affect farm investment? A comparison using French and British farm-level panel data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84: 1115-1129. Go to original source...
    3. Blancard S., Boussemart J.P., Briec W., Kerstens K. (2006): Short-and long-run credit constraints in French agriculture: A directional distance function framework using expenditure-constrained profit functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88: 351-364. Go to original source...
    4. Caliendo M., Kopeinig S. (2008): Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22: 31-72. Go to original source...
    5. Chabé-Ferret S., Subervie J. (2013): How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of the French agro-environmental schemes by DID matching. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65: 12-27. Go to original source...
    6. Defrancesco E., Gatto P., Runge F., Trestini S. (2008). Factors affecting farmers' participation in agri-environmental measures: A Northern Italian perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59: 114-131. Go to original source...
    7. Dehejia R., Wahba S. (2002): Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84: 151-161. Go to original source...
    8. De Long J.B., Summers L.H., Abel A.B. (1992). Equipment investment and economic growth: how strong is the nexus? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992: 157-211. Go to original source...
    9. European Commission (2009): Rural Development (2000- 2006) in EU Farms. EC DGAGRI, Brussels.
    10. Esposti R., Sotte F. (2013): Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural and rural policies: an introduction. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40: 535-539. Go to original source...
    11. Goddard E., Weersink A., Chen K., Turvey C.G. (1993): Economics of structural change in agriculture. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 41: 475-489. Go to original source...
    12. Hazell P B., Poulto C., Wiggin, S., Dorwar A. (2007): The future of small farms for poverty reduction and growth. Discussion Paper 42, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington.
    13. Heckman J.J., Ichimura H., Todd P.E. (1997): Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64: 605-654 Go to original source...
    14. Heckman J.J., Ichimura H., Smith J., Todd P.E. (1998): Characterizing selection bias using experimental data, Econometrica. 66: 1017-1098. Go to original source...
    15. Heckman J.J., Navarro-Lozano S. (2004): Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86: 30-57. Go to original source...
    16. Kirchweger S., Kantelhardt J., Leisch F. (2015): Impacts of the government-supported investments on the economic farm performance in Austria. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 61: 343-355. Go to original source...
    17. Medonos T., Ratinger T., Hruska M., Spicka J. (2012): The assessment of the effects of investment support measures of the rural development programmes: the case of the Czech Republic. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4: 35-48.
    18. Michalek J., Ciaian P., Kancs D. (2013): Firm-level evidence of deadweight loss of investment support policies: a case study of dairy farms in Schleswig-Holstein. In: IATRC 2013 Symposium: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013, Seville.
    19. Moro D., Sckokai P. (2011): The impact of pillar 1 support on farm choices: conceptual and methodological challenges. In: 122nd EAAE Seminar, Feb 17-18, 2011, Ancona.
    20. OECD (2009): Methods to Monitor and Evaluate the Impacts of Agricultural Policies on Rural Development. OECD, Paris.
    21. Ortner K.M. (2012): Evaluation of investment support in rural development programmes: results for selected measures. In: Cvijanović D., Floriańczyk Z. (eds): Rural Development Policies from the EU Enlargement Perspective. ERDN book series, Rural areas and development, 9: 39-50.
    22. Pascucci S., de-Magistris T., Dries L., Adinolfi F., Capitanio F. (2013): Participation of Italian farmers in rural development policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40: 605-631. Go to original source...
    23. Power L. (1998): The missing link: Technology, investment, and productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 300-313. Go to original source...
    24. Pufahl A., Weiss C.R. (2009): Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36: 79-101. Go to original source...
    25. Romer P.M. (1986): Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002-1037. Go to original source...
    26. Rosenbaum P., Rubin D.B. (1983): The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effect. Biometrika, 70: 41-50. Go to original source...
    27. Rosenzweig M.R., Binswanger H.P. (1993): Wealth, weather risk and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments. Economic Journal, 103: 56-78. Go to original source...
    28. Smith J.A., Todd P.E. (2005): Does matching overcome Lalonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125: 305-353. Go to original source...
    29. Todd P.E. (2008): Evaluating social programs with endogenous program placement and selection of the treated. In: Schultz T.P., Strauss J.A. (eds): Handbook of Development Economics, 4: 3847-3894. Go to original source...
    30. Udagawa C., Hodge I., Reader M. (2014): Farm level costs of agri-environment measures: the impact of entry level stewardship on cereal farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65: 212-233. Go to original source...
    31. Weiss C.R. (1999): Farm growth and survival: econometric evidence for individual farms in Upper Austria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81: 103-116. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content