Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2017, 63(12):569-578 | DOI: 10.17221/195/2016-AGRICECON

An environmental and economic evaluation of carbon sequestration from pyrolysis and biochar application in ChinaOriginal Paper

Xiaoyong CAO1, Chih-Chun KUNG*,2, Yuelong WANG3
1 School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
2 Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
3 Center of regulation and competition, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

In the past decade, China has more than doubled its consumption of fossil fuels resulting in the emission of substantial amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2), which are considered to be the main cause of climate change. To mitigate climate change and ensure the continued survival of life on earth, the current level of CO2R emissions must be cut. This study establishes a price endogenous mathematical programming (Jiangxi Agricultural Sector Model) and incorporates bioenergy technologies such as ethanol, conventional co-firing and pyrolysis to examine how an agricultural province may contribute to bioenergy development and carbon sequestration. The results indicate that under moderate energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) prices, net electricity generation reaches 6.5 billion kWh annually. Net emission reduction is affected by market operations. At high GHG prices, pyrolysis and biochar application can sequester up to 4.74 million tons of CO2R emissions annually. However, this measure fluctuates significantly when GHG prices vary. Our study shows that pyrolysis and biochar application provide significant environmental effects in terms of carbon sequestration.

Keywords: climate change, GHG mitigation, renewable energy, soil amendment

Published: December 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
CAO X, KUNG C, WANG Y. An environmental and economic evaluation of carbon sequestration from pyrolysis and biochar application in China. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2017;63(12):569-578. doi: 10.17221/195/2016-AGRICECON.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file195-016 Cao et al Appendix.pdf

File size: 81.19 kB

References

  1. Boschiero M., Kelderer M., Schmitt A.O., Andreotti C., Zerbe S. (2015): Influence of agricultural residues interpretation and allocation procedures on the environmental performance of bioelectricity production - A case study on woodchips from apple orchards. Applied Energy, 147: 235-245. Go to original source...
  2. Bridgwater A.V., Peacocke G.V.C. (2004): Fast pyrolysis process for biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4: 1-73. Go to original source...
  3. Bridgwater T. (2005): Fast pyrolysis based biorefineries. Chemistry, 4: 15-37.
  4. Burton R.O., Martin M.A. (1987): Restrictions on herbicide use: an analysis of economic impacts on U.S. agriculture. North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9: 181-194. Go to original source...
  5. Chan K.Y., Zwieten L., Meszaros I., Downie A., Joseph S. (2007): Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 45: 629-634. Go to original source...
  6. Chang C.C. (2002): The potential impacts of climate change on Taiwan's agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 27: 51-64. Go to original source...
  7. Chang C.C., McCarl B.A., Mjedle J., Richardson J.W. (1992): Sectoral implications of farm program modifications. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74: 38-49. Go to original source...
  8. Chapagain A.K., Hoekstra A.Y. (2008): The global component of freshwater demand and supply: an assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products. Water International, 33: 19-32. Go to original source...
  9. Chen C.C., Chang C.C. (2005): The impact of weather on crop yield distribution in Taiwan: Some new evidence from panel data models and implications for crop insurance. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 33: 503-511. Go to original source...
  10. Chidumayo E.N. (1994): Phenology and nutrition of Miombo woodland trees in Zambia. Trees, 9: 67-72. Go to original source...
  11. Coble K.H., Chang C.C., McCarl B.A., Eddleman B.R. (1992): Assessing economic implications of new technology: the case of cornstarch-based biodegradable plastics. Review of Agricultural Economics, 14: 33-43. Go to original source...
  12. Czernik S., Bridgwater A.V. (2004): Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuels, 18: 590-598. Go to original source...
  13. Deluca T.H., MacKenzie M.D., Gundale M.J. (2009): Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann J., Joseph S. (eds): Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan Publisher, London: 137-182.
  14. Djomo N.S., Witters N., Van Dael M., Gabrielle B., Ceulemans R. (2015): Impact of feedstock, land use change, and soil organic carbon on energy and greenhouse gas performance of biomass cogeneration technologies. Applied Energy, 154: 122-130. Go to original source...
  15. Fargione J., Hill J, Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. (2008): Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319: 1235-1238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Field C.B., Campbell D. (2008): Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23: 65-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Glaser B., Lehmann J., Zech W. (2002): Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35: 219-230. Go to original source...
  18. Glaser B., Parr M., Braun C., Kopolo G. (2009): Biochar is carbon negative, Nature Geoscience, 2: 2. Go to original source...
  19. Guieysse B., Béchet Q., Shilton A. (2013): Variability and uncertainty in water demand and water footprint assessments of fresh algae cultivation based on case studies from five climatic regions. Bioresource Technology, 128: 317-323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Gustavsson L., Haus S., Ortiz C.A., Sathre R., Truong N.L. (2015): Climate effects of bioenergy from forest residues in comparison to fossil energy. Applied Energy, 138: 36-50. Go to original source...
  21. Iswaran V., Jauhri K.S., Sen A. (1980): Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong, soybean and pea. Soil and Biological Biochemistry, 12: 191-192. Go to original source...
  22. Kishimoto S., Sugiura G. (1985): Charcoal as a Soil Conditioner. International Achieve Future, 5: 12-23.
  23. Kung C.C., Kong F., Choi Y. (2015): Pyrolysis and biochar potential using crop residues and agricultural wastes in China. Ecological Indicators, 51: 139-145. Go to original source...
  24. Kung C.C., McCarl B.A., Cao X.Y. (2013): Economics of pyrolysis based energy production and biochar utilization - a case study in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 60: 317-323. Go to original source...
  25. Kung C.C., McCarl B.A., Chen C.C., Cao X.Y. (2014a): Environmental impact and bioenergy production from pyrolysis in Taiwan. Energy & Environment, 25: 13-39. Go to original source...
  26. Kung C.C., McCarl B.A., Chen C.C. (2014b): An environmental and economic evaluation of pyrolysis for energy generation in Taiwan with endogenous land greenhouse gases emissions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11: 2973-2991. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Lehmann J. (2007): A handful of carbon. Nature, 447: 143-144. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Lehmann J. (2007): Bio-energy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5: 381-387. Go to original source...
  29. Lehmann J., Gaunt J., Rondon M. (2006): Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems - a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11: 403-427. Go to original source...
  30. Lehmann J., Joseph S. (ed.) (2009): Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan Publisher, London.
  31. Major J., Lehmann J., Rondon M., Goodale C. (2009): Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change Biology, 16: 1366-1379. Go to original source...
  32. Marta A.D., Mancini M., Natali F., Orlando F., Orlandini S. (2012): From water to bioethanol: the impact of climate variability on the water footprint. Journal of Hydrology, 444-445: 180-186. Go to original source...
  33. McCarl B.A., Adams D.M., Alig R.J., Chmelik J.T. (2000): Analysis of biomass fueled electrical power plants: implications in the agricultural and forestry sectors. Annals of Operations Research, 94: 37-55. Go to original source...
  34. McCarl B.A., Peacocke C., Chrisman R., Kung C.C., Ronald D. (2009): Economics of biochar production, utilization, and GHG offsets. In: Lehmann J., Joseph S. (eds): Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan Publisher, London: 341-357.
  35. McCarl B.A., Spreen T.H. (1980): Price endogenous mathematical programming as a tool for sector analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62: 87-102. Go to original source...
  36. Nehls T. (2002): Fertility improvement of Terra Firme Oxisol in central Amazonia by charcoal applications. Environmental Science, 14: 21-45.
  37. Oguntunde P.G., Abiodun B.J., Ajayi A.E., Giesen N. (2004): Effects of charcoal production on soil physical properties in Ghana. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 171: 591-596. Go to original source...
  38. Ringer M., Putsche V., Scahill J. (2006): Large-Scale Pyrolysis Oil Production: A Technology Assessment and Economic Analysis. Technical Report NERL/TP-51037779, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden. Go to original source...
  39. Samuelson P.A. (1952): Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review, 42: 283-303.
  40. Sastre C.M., González-Arechavala Y., Santos A.M. (2015): Global warming and energy yield evaluation of Spanish wheat straw electricity generation - a LCA that takes into account parameter uncertainty and variability. Applied Energy, 154: 900-911. Go to original source...
  41. Scown C.D., Horvath A., McKone T.E. (2011): Water footprint of U.S. transportation fuels. Environmental Science & Technology, 45: 2541-2553. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Tokgoz S., Hayes D., Yu T. (2008): Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319: 1238-1240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Sohi S.P., Krull E., Lopez-Capel E., Bol R. (2010): A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 105: 47-82. Go to original source...
  44. Steiner T., Mosenthin R., Zimmermann B., Greiner R., Roth S. (2007): Distribution of phytase activity, total phosphorus and phytate phosphorus in legume seeds, cereals and cereal products as influenced by harvest year and cultivar. Animal Feed Science Technology, 133: 320-334. Go to original source...
  45. Takayama T., Judge G.G. (1971): Spatial and Temporal Price Allocation Models. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.
  46. Van Meerbeek K., Ottoy S., Meyer A.D., Van Schaeybroeck T., Van Orshoven J., Muys B., Hermy M. (2015): The bioenergy potential of conservation areas and roadsides for biogas in an urbanized region. Applied Energy, 154: 742-751. Go to original source...
  47. Wang M. (2007): Well-to-wheels, Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Results of Fuel Ethanol. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont.
  48. Wright M.M., Brown R.C., Boateng A.A. (2008): Distributed processing of biomass to bio-oil for subsequent production of Fischer-Tropsch liquids. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2: 229-238. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.