Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2016, 62(11):507-516 | DOI: 10.17221/133/2015-AGRICECON

Agricultural competitiveness: The case of the European Union countriesOriginal Paper

Anna NOWAK, Agnieszka KAMINSKA
University of Life Science in Lublin, Lublin, Poland

The paper assesses the competitiveness of agriculture of 27 countries of the European Union in the years 2009-2011. Due to the complexity of the phenomenon of competitiveness, a wide range of variables was adopted to evaluate it - including the relationship between the production factors, productivity, and the importance of agriculture in the international trade. Based on the evaluation criteria chosen for the competitiveness assessment and using the TOPSIS method, a synthetic measure of the studied phenomenon was constructed and then divided into four groups of countries similar in terms of the level of competitiveness of agriculture. The difference between the value of the synthetic measure of the country with the highest level of competitiveness of agriculture (Netherlands) and the country least competitive in this regard (Slovenia) was 3.5-fold. In addition to the Netherlands, there were classified also France, Germany, Denmark and Belgium in the first group, so the countries with high levels of the socio-economic development. In the second group, there were seven countries: Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain, Cyprus, Austria, Ireland and Luxembourg. Therefore, the first two groups are formed by the countries belonging to the so-called "Old 15" (except Cyprus). The last two groups are formed primarily by the countries that joined the European Union in 2004 or later.

Keywords: agriculture, countries, synthetic indicator, TOPSIS method

Published: November 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
NOWAK A, KAMINSKA A. Agricultural competitiveness: The case of the European Union countries. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2016;62(11):507-516. doi: 10.17221/133/2015-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Arzeni A., Esposti R., Sotte F. (2001): Agriculture in transition countries and the European model of agriculture: entrepreneurship and multifunctionality. Report for the World Bank - Project "Šibenik-Knin and Zadar Counties: Framework for a Regional Development Vision", University of Ancona.
    2. Atkinson R.D. (2013): Competitiveness, Innovation and Productivity: Clearing up the Confusion. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. Available at http://www2.itif.org/2013-competitiveness-innovationproductivity-clearing-up-confusion.pdf
    3. Bulgurcu B. (2012): Application of TOPSIS technique for financial performance evaluation of technology firms in Istanbul stock exchange market. Precodia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62: 1033-1040. Go to original source...
    4. Chen M.F., Tzeng G. H. (2004): Combining gray relations and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40: 1473-1490. Go to original source...
    5. Cockburn J., Siggel E., Coulibaly M., Vezina S. (1998): Measuring Competitiveness and its Sources: the Case of Mali's Manufacturing Sector. African Economic Policy Research Report, USAID, October.
    6. Demireli E. (2010): TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making method: an examination on state owned commercial banks in Turkey. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 5: 101-112.
    7. EU Commission (2003): European Competitiveness Report 2003. Commission staff working document SEC(2003)1299. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/45433/ (accessed Jan, 2015).
    8. EU Commission (2009): European Competitiveness Report 2008. Brussels. Available at ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ newsroom/cf/_getdocument.cfm?doc_id (accessed Jan, 2015).
    9. Fuller F., Beghin J.Ch. (ed.) (2007): European Agriculture: Enlargement, Structural Change, CAP Reform and Trade Liberalization. Nova Publishers, New York.
    10. Grega L. (2002): Price stabilization as a factor of competitiveness of agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 48: 281-284. Go to original source...
    11. Hatzichronoglou T. (1996): Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. OECD, STI Working papers 5. Available at http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf (accessed Feb, 2015).
    12. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. (1981): Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin. Go to original source...
    13. Janic M. (2003): Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26: 491-512. Go to original source...
    14. Józwiak W. (ed.) (2012): The Improve the Position of Polish Agriculture - Preliminary Proposals. IERiGŻ, Warszawa (in Polish).
    15. Kaminska A. (2012): The application of the tools of spatial statistics to study regional differentation of polish environment. Colloquium Biometricum, 42: 111-119.
    16. Kołodziejczak A. (2010): Models of Spatial Differentiation of Farming Methods in Polish Agriculture. UAM, Poznań.
    17. Korom E., Sági J. (2005): Measures of competitiveness in agriculture. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6: 375-380.
    18. Kravčáková Vozárová I. (2013): The measurement of the competitiveness of EU agricultural production at the macroeconomic level. Exclusive Journal, Economy & Society & Environment, 1: 155-162.
    19. Latruffe L. (2010): Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers No. 30. OECD Publishing. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en(accessed Feb, 2015).
    20. Hatzichronoglou T. (1996): Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. OECD, STI Working papers 5. Available at http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf (accessed Feb, 2015).
    21. Martino G., Marchini A. (1996): The role of agriculture in developed economies: new tendencies. MEDIT, 3: 26-30.
    22. Niezgoda D. (2009): Determinants of profitability of agricultural holdings diversified in respect of their economic size. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych - Serie G, 96: 155-165 (in Polish). Go to original source...
    23. Poczta W., Fabisiak A. (2007): Changes in labour force resources in agriculture in the Central and Eastern European Countries as a result of accession to the European Union. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu - CCCLXXXV, Ekonomia, 6: 109-117.
    24. Porter M.E. (1990): Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York. Go to original source...
    25. Porter M.E. (2001): Porter about the Competition. PWE, Warszawa (in Polish).
    26. Schwab K. (ed.) (2013): The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. World Economic Forum. Available at http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf (accessed Feb, 2015).
    27. Serrão A. (2003): Comparison of agricultural productivity among European countries. New Medit, 1: 14-20.
    28. Shih H.S., Shybur H.J., Lee E.S. (2007): An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45: 801-813. Go to original source...
    29. Srdjevic B., Medeiros Y.D.P., Faria A.S. (2005): An objective multi evaluation of water management scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18: 35-54. Go to original source...
    30. World Competitiveness Yearbook (2012): IMD World Competitiveness Center. Available at http://www.imd.org/wcc/wcy-world-competitivenessyearbook (accessed Feb, 2015).
    31. Yang T., Chou P. (2005): Solving a multiresponse simulation - optimalization problem with discrete variables using multi-attribute decision-making method. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 68: 9-21. Go to original source...
    32. Zawalińska K. (2004): The Competitiveness of Polish Agriculture in the Context of Integration with the European Union. Warsaw University Department of Economics, Warsaw.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content