Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2015, 61(10):450-460 | DOI: 10.17221/63/2015-AGRICECON

Factors that influence the competitiveness of Czech rural SMEsOriginal Paper

Josef ABRHÁM1, Wadim STRIELKOWSKI2, Milan VOŠTA1, Jan ŠLAJS1
1 University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper focuses on determining the key factors that influence the competitiveness of rural small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Czech Republic. Rural SMEs play an important part in sustainable rural development, post-transformation processes, as well as in the integrated development of formal and informal rural institutions in the Czech economy. The research design is based on a questionnaire survey conducted with a sample of 1144 randomly selected Czech rural SMEs. There was applied a one-way error model expressed either by the fixed effects (FE) model and the random effect (RE) model with the error term consisting of two components: a time-invariant component and a remainder component that is assumed to be uncorrelated over time. It was also attempted to rule out the individual location effects in the econometric model by using the location variables (location dummies).The results also show that the success of the rural SMEs in the Czech Republic is mostly related to its manager and enterprise characteristics. The most significant determinants of rural enterprise's competitiveness are location within a region with competitive situation, the enterprise size, the enterprise age, and the fact whether the enterprise has some form of innovation. The results might have significant implications for both academics and stakeholders and can be used as a basis for the targeted rural enterprise policies in the Czech Republic and in the post-transitional Eastern and Central Europe.

Keywords: rural development, SMEs, Czech Republic, Central and Eastern Europe

Published: October 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ABRHÁM J, STRIELKOWSKI W, VOŠTA M, ŠLAJS J. Factors that influence the competitiveness of Czech rural SMEs. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2015;61(10):450-460. doi: 10.17221/63/2015-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abrham J. (2011): Rural development and regional disparities of the new EU Member States. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 57: 288-296. Go to original source...
    2. Adekunle B. (2011): Determinants of microenterprise performance in Nigeria. International Small Business Journal, 29: 360-373. Go to original source...
    3. Amemiya T. (1984): Tobit models: A survey. Journal of Econometrics, 24: 3-61. Go to original source...
    4. Anik A.R., Bauer S., Alam M.J. (2013): Why farm households have differences in corruption experiences? Evidences from Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 59: 478-488. Go to original source...
    5. Anim-Somuah H. (2011): Determinants of micro and small enterprise performance: The agri-food sector of Ghana. [PhD dissertation.] University of Guelph, Guelph.
    6. Bielik P., Smutka l., Svatoš M., Hupkova D. (2013): Czech and Slovak agricultural foreign trade - two decades after the dissolution. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 59: 441-453. Go to original source...
    7. Burgel O., Fier A., Licht G., Murray G. (2004): The Internationalisation of Young High-Tech Firms. Physica, Mannheim. Go to original source...
    8. Czech Statistical Office (2014): Ekonomicke subjekty podle poctu zamestnancu a kraju. Available at: <http://vdb. czso.cz> (accessed Nov 24, 2014].
    9. De Mel S., McKenzie D.J., Woodrufi C. (2008): Returns to capital in microenterprises: Evidence from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123: 1329-1372. Go to original source...
    10. De Mel S., McKenzie D.J., Woodrufi C. (2009): Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics, 88: 19-31. Go to original source...
    11. Dobson S.M., Gerrard B.J. (1989): Growth and profitability in the Leeds engineering sector. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 36: 334-352.
    12. Evans D.S. (1987): Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 95: 657-674. Go to original source...
    13. Gillet S., Lehr W (1999): The availability of Broadband Internet a ccess: empirical evidence. In: 27 th Annual Technical Research Conference, Alexandria, Egypt.
    14. Greene W. (2000): Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, New York.
    15. Heckman J. (1979): Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47: 153-161. Go to original source...
    16. Honig B. (1998): What determines success? Examining the human, financial, and social capital of Jamaican microentrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 371-394. Go to original source...
    17. Janda K., Rausser G., Strielkowski W. (2013): Determinants of profitability of Polish rural micro-enterprises at the time of EU accession. Eastern European Countryside, 19: 177-217 Go to original source...
    18. Jenicek V. (2013): Sustainable development - indicators. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 59: 74-80. Go to original source...
    19. Kadocsa G., Francsovics A. (2011): Macro and micro economic factors of small enterprise competitiveness. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 8: 23-40.
    20. Mano Y., Iddrisu A., Yoshino Y., Sonobe T. (2012): How can micro and small enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa become more productive? The impacts of experimental basic managerial training. World Development, 40: 458-468. Go to original source...
    21. Mark J., Munoz S. (2010): Contemporary Microenterprise: Concepts and Cases. Edward Elgar.
    22. Mmbengwa V.M., Ramukumba T., Groenewald J.A., van Schalkwyk H.D, Gundidza M.B., Maiwashe A.N. (2011): Evaluation of essential capacities required for the performance of farming small, micro and medium enterprise (SMEs) in South Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 1500-1507. Go to original source...
    23. North D., Smallbone D. (1995): The employment generation potential of mature SMEs in different geographical environments. Urban Studies, 32: 1517-1536. Go to original source...
    24. Rankhumise E.M., Rugimbana R.O. (2010): Micro enterprise owner perspectives on performance: Insights from selected municipalities in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 4: 3500-3507.
    25. Reid G. (1993): Small Business Enterprises: An Economic Analysis, Routledge, London. Go to original source...
    26. Riyanti P.D. (2004). Factors influencing the success of smallscale entrepreneurs in Indonesia. In: Ongoing themes in psychology and culture. International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Melbourne. Go to original source...
    27. Romer D. (2011): Advanced Macroeconomics. Harvard University Press, Harvard.
    28. Schreiner M., Woller G. (2003): Microenterprise development programs in the United States and in the developing world. World Development, 31: 1567-1580. Go to original source...
    29. Simoneti M., Damijan J.P., Majcen B., Rojec M. (2002): Performance after mass privatization: a case of Slovenia. Centre for the Study of Economic and Social Change in Europe, WP10, University College London, London.
    30. Storey D.J. (1994): Understanding the Small Business Sector. Routledge, London.
    31. Strielkowski W. (2013). Determinants of survival, growth and employment creation in Polish firms. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Prague.
    32. Toeroek A., Tóth J. (2013): Open characters of innovation management in the Hungarian wine industry. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 59: 430-439. Go to original source...
    33. Variyam J.N., Kraybill D.S. (1992): Empirical evidence on determinants of firm growth. Economics Letters, 38: 31-36. Go to original source...
    34. Wagner J. (1995): Firm size and job creation in Germany. Small Business Economics, 7: 469-474. Go to original source...
    35. Zahra S. A. (1996): Technology strategy and financial performance: examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment. Journal of Business venturing, 11: 189-219. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content