Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2015, 61(6):284-295 | DOI: 10.17221/147/2014-AGRICECON

Economic effects of the biochar application on rice supply in TaiwanOriginal Paper

Meng-Shiuh CHANG1, Wen WANG1, Chih-Chun KUNG2
1 School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China
2 Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China

The objective of the study is to analyze the economics of the bio-energy production for Taiwan in terms of the bio-energy production, social welfare and crop yield increase under the conventional bio-power, ethanol and pyrolysis. The effects on rice production patterns are also examined for the fast and slow pyrolysis plus the biochar application. In addition to adopting the mathematical programming model (Modified Taiwan Agricultural Sector Model) in the analysis of the bio-energy production and the crop cultivation patterns, the study further employs a nonparametric kernel regression model to forecast the increased benefits of rice from using biochar under various scenarios. With the biochar application, Taiwan's rice production could increase ranging from 6308 to 38 118 tons annually, depending on the pyrolysis type and the plant location. The results indicate that the biochar utilization can potentially increase social benefits if rice is planted. The net increase of farmer>s and the environmental revenues can achieve up to NT$ 419 400. Moreover, we find that farmers should give priority to the improvement of nutrient saving to make higher benefits. Second, the total benefits could be improved if the seed use is efficient and harvesting and transporting costs for the energy crop and processing and the hauling cost of biochar are lower. Simulation results indicate that Taiwan benefits from the bio-energy production in terms of energy security, farmers revenue, social welfare and rice supply. The results show that, in general, pyrolysis plus the biochar application not only increase the domestic renewable energy supply but also enhance the farmers' and environmental revenues significantly.

Keywords: bio-ethanol, energy security, food supply, nonparametric analysis, pyrolysis

Published: June 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
CHANG M, WANG W, KUNG C. Economic effects of the biochar application on rice supply in Taiwan. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2015;61(6):284-295. doi: 10.17221/147/2014-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Adams D.M., Hamilton S.A., McCarl B.A. (1986): The benefits of air pollution control: the case of the ozone and U.S. agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68: 886-894. Go to original source...
  2. Bridgwater T. (2005): Fast pyrolysis based biorefineries. Chemistry, 4: 15-37.
  3. Burton R.O., Martin M.A. (1987): Restrictions on herbicide use: an analysis of economic impacts on U.S. agriculture. North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9: 181-194. Go to original source...
  4. Chan K.Y., Zwieten L., Meszaros I., Downie A., Joseph S. (2007): Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 45: 629-634. Go to original source...
  5. Chang C.C., Eddleman B.R., McCarl B.A. (1991): Potential benefits of rice variety and water management improvements in the Texas gulf coast. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16: 185-193.
  6. Chang C.C., McCarl B.A., Mjedle J., Richardson J.W. (1992): Sectoral implications of farm program modifications. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74: 38-49. Go to original source...
  7. Chang C.C. (2002): The potential impacts of climate change on Taiwan's agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 27: 51-64. Go to original source...
  8. Chen C.C., Chang C.C. (2005): The impact of weather on crop yield distribution in Taiwan: Some new evidence from panel data models and implications for crop insurance. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 33: 503-511. Go to original source...
  9. Chidumayo E.N. (1994): Phenology and nutrition of Miombo woodland trees in Zambia. Trees, 9: 67-72. Go to original source...
  10. Coble K.H., Chang C.C., McCarl B.A., Eddleman B.R. (1992): Assessing economic implications of new technology: the case of cornstarch-based biodegradable plastics. Review of Agricultural Economics, 14: 33-43. Go to original source...
  11. Deluca T.H., MacKenzie M.D., Gundale M.J. (2009): Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann J., Joseph S. (eds): Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan Publisher, London: 137-182.
  12. Erickson C. (2003): Historical ecology and future explorations. In: Lehmann J., Kern D.C., Glaser B., Woods W.I. (eds): Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 45-59.
  13. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. (2008): Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319: 1235-1238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Glaser B., Lehmann J., Zech W. (2002): Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - a review. Biological Fertile Soils, 35: 219-230. Go to original source...
  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007): Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  16. Iswaran V., Jauhri, K.S., Sen A. (1980): Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong, soybean and pea. Soil and Biological Biochemistry, 12: 191-192. Go to original source...
  17. Kishimoto S., Sugiura G. (1985): Charcoal as a soil conditioner. International Achieve Future, 5: 12-23.
  18. Kung C.C., McCarl B.A., Cao X.Y. (2013). Economics of pyrolysis based energy production and biochar utilization: A case study in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 60: 317-323. Go to original source...
  19. Lehmann J., Silva J.P., Steiner C., Nehls T., Zech W., Glaser B. (2003): Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil, 249: 343-357. Go to original source...
  20. Lehmann J., Gaunt J., Rondon M. (2006): Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems - a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11: 403-427. Go to original source...
  21. Lehmann J. (2007): A handful of carbon. Nature, 447: 143-144. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Li Q., Racine J.S. (2007): Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press.
  23. McCarl B.A., Spreen T.H. (1980): Price endogenous mathematical programming as a tool for sector analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62: 87-102. Go to original source...
  24. McCarl B.A., Keplinger K.O., Dillon C.R., Williams R.L. (1999): Limiting pumping from the Edwards Aquifer: An economic investigation of proposals, water markets and spring flow guarantees. Water Resources Research, 35: 1257-1268. Go to original source...
  25. McCarl B.A., Schneider U.A. (2000): Agriculture's role in a greenhouse gas emission mitigation world: an economic perspective. Review of Agricultural Economics, 22: 134-59. Go to original source...
  26. McCarl B.A. (2008): Food, biofuel, global agriculture, and environment: discussion. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30: 530-532. Go to original source...
  27. McCarl B.A., Peacocke C., Chrisman, R. Kung C.C., Ronald D. (2009): Economics of biochar production, utilization, and GHG offsets. In: Lehmann J., Joseph S. (eds): Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Earthscan Publisher, London: 341-357.
  28. Oguntunde P.G., Abiodun B.J., Ajayi A.E., Giesen N. (2004): Effects of Charcoal production on soil physical properties in Ghana. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 171: 591-596. Go to original source...
  29. Racine J.S., Hart J., Li Q. (2006): Testing the significance of categorical predictor variables in nonparametric regression models. Econometric Reviews, 25: 523-544. Go to original source...
  30. Radlein D. (2007): The potential role of agrichar in the commercialization of dynamotive's fast pyrolysis process. Australia Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29: 89-101.
  31. Reilly J.M., Tubiello F., McCarl B.A., Abler D.G., Darwin R., Fuglie K., Hollinger S.E., Izaurralde R.C., Jagtap S., Jones J.W., Mearns L.O., Ojima D.S., Paul E.A., Paustian K., Riha S.J., Rosenberg N.J., Rosenzweig C. (2002): U.S. agriculture and climate change: new results. Climatic Change, 57: 43-69. Go to original source...
  32. Ringer M., Putsche V., Scahill J. (2006): Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. Environmental Science, 17: 21-33. Go to original source...
  33. Samuelson P.A. (1950): Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review, 42: 283-303.
  34. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Tokgoz S., Hayes D., Yu T. (2008): Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319: 1238-1240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Sombroek W.G. (2003): Amazonian dark earths as carbon stores and sinks. Science, 4: 12-13.
  36. Steiner T., Mosenthin R., Zimmermann B., Greiner R., Roth S. (2007): Distribution of phytase activity, total phosphorus and phytate phosphorus in legume seeds, cereals and cereal products as influenced by harvest year and cultivar. Animal Feed Science Technology, 133: 320-334. Go to original source...
  37. USDOE (U.S. Department of Energy) (2005): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Bioenergy Service, Washington, DC. 2005.
  38. Wright M.M., Brown R.C., Boateng A.A. (2008): Distributed processing of biomass to bio-oil for subsequent production of Fischer-Tropsch liquids. Biofuels, Bioprocessing, and Biorefining, 2: 229-238. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.