Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2015, 61(1):39-49 | DOI: 10.17221/60/2014-AGRICECON

Agricultural subsidy with capacity constraints and demand elasticityOriginal Paper

You-Hua CHEN1,2, Jun-Yi WAN1, Chan WANG3
1 College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
2 Guangdong Centre for Rural Economic Studies, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
3 Institute of Industrial Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China

Agricultural subsidy has attracted more and more attention. This paper captures the effects of subsidy (including area subsidy and price subsidy) on the total sown areas of crops based on the assumption that subsidy has both stimulating effects and inhibiting effects. Different from the prior studies, this paper considers the impacts of the farmland constraint and demand elasticity and some interesting conclusions are achieved. Firstly, a stimulating effect increases crop sown areas while an inhibiting effect reduces them. Secondly, the output efficiency of farmland as well as the demand elasticity has a major impact on the government subsidy. Besides, the capacity constraint makes thing difference and the government should choose between the areas subsidy and price subsidy under different conditions. Finally, this paper offers an empirical test on the conclusions by adopting the Chinese agricultural statistical data.

Keywords: allowance, constrained farmland inputs, inhibiting effect, stimulating effect

Published: January 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
CHEN Y, WAN J, WANG C. Agricultural subsidy with capacity constraints and demand elasticity. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2015;61(1):39-49. doi: 10.17221/60/2014-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson K., Swinnen J. (2010): How distorted have agricultural incentives become in Europe's transition economies? Eastern European Economics, 48: 79-109. Go to original source...
  2. Anderson K., Rausser G., Swinnen J. (2013): Political economy of public policies: Insights from distortions to agricultural and food markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 51: 423-477. Go to original source...
  3. Anderson K, Will M (2009): Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia. World Bank, Washington. Go to original source...
  4. Du Y.N., Sun B., Fang B. (2011): The review and reflection of Chinese new agricultural subsidy system. Journal of Politics and Law, 4: 132-137. Go to original source...
  5. Esó P., Nocke V., White L. (2010): Competition for scarce resources. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41: 524- 548. Go to original source...
  6. Graff G.D., Hochman G., Zilberman D. (2009): The political economy of agricultural biotechnology policies. AgBioForum, 12: 34-46.
  7. Huang J.K., Wang X.B., Zhi H.Y., Huang Z.R., Rozelle S. (2010): Subsidies and distortions in China's agriculture: evidence from producer-level data. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55: 53-71. Go to original source...
  8. Krueger A.O., Schiff M., Valdes A. (1988): Agricultural incentives in developing countries: measuring the effect of sectoral and economywide policies. World Bank Economic Review, 2: 255-271. Go to original source...
  9. Michael J. R., Wolfram S. (2013): Identifying supply and demand elasticities of agricultural commodities: implications for the US ethanol mandate. American Economic Review, 103: 2265-2295. Go to original source...
  10. Nie P.Y. (2014): Effects of capacity constraints on mixed duopoly. Journal of Economics (in press). Go to original source...
  11. Nie P.Y., Chen Y.H. (2012): Duopoly competition with capacity constrained input. Economic Modeling, 29: 1715-1721. Go to original source...
  12. Olper A. (2001): Determinants of agricultural protection: the role of democracy and institutional setting. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52: 75-91. Go to original source...
  13. Rizov M., Pokrivcak J., Ciaian P. (2013): CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64: 537-557. Go to original source...
  14. Sacco D., Schmutzer A. (2011): Is there a U-shaped relation between competition and investment? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29: 65- 73. Go to original source...
  15. Swinnen J. (1994): A positive theory of agricultural protection. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76: 1-14. Go to original source...
  16. Tan Y.W., Guan J., Karimi H.R. (2013): The impact of the subsidy policy on total factor productivity: an empirical analysis of China's cotton production. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 66: 1457-1466. Go to original source...
  17. Yu W.S., Jensen H.G. (2010): China's agricultural policy transition: impacts of recent reforms and future scenarios. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61: 343-368. Go to original source...
  18. Zhang P.G. (1949): Agriculture and Industrialization. The Adjustments that Take Place as an Agricultural Country is Industrialized. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Go to original source...
  19. Zietz J., Valdts A. (1993): The Growth of Agricultural Protection, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.