Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(9):420-429 | DOI: 10.17221/6/2013-AGRICECON

Fiscal decentralization, local government competition and farmland conversion in China: the co-integration analysis and the GMM estimation based on the inter-provincial panel dataOriginal Paper

Xu HENGZHOU1, Yin HONGCHUN1, Guo YUYAN2
1 School of Management, Tianjin University, Tianjin, P.R. China
2 Institute of Social Policy, Jiangsu Academy of Social Sciences, Nanjing, P.R. China

Based on the Chinese provincial panel data from 1995 to 2008, using the panel co-integration method, this paper presents an empirical study on the long-term equilibrium relationship between the fiscal decentralization, the local government competition and the farmland conversion. On this basis, establishing the dynamic panel data model, using the generalized method of moments (GMM) to analyze the dynamic impact of the fiscal decentralization and the local government competition on the farmland conversion from the view of three cross-regional groups and the mainland China. The results show that there is a long-run co-integration relationship between the fiscal decentralization, the farmland conversion and the local government competition, and also there is a positive significant influence of the fiscal decentralization and the local government competition on the farmland conversion, a 1% increase in the degree of fiscal decentralization will increase the area of farmland conversion by 0.3280%. In addition, there is a significant difference of the incentive effect of local government competition on the farmland conversion in different regions. The paper ends with policy suggestions for perfecting the system of the fiscal decentralization, taxation and the division of responsibility and authority, reforming the criterion of the political achievement assessment, strengthening the management of land revenue, reducing the reliance of the local government on land finance; at the same time, the farmers' land property rights should be perfected.

Keywords: farmland conversion, fiscal decentralization, panel data, China

Published: September 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HENGZHOU X, HONGCHUN Y, YUYAN G. Fiscal decentralization, local government competition and farmland conversion in China: the co-integration analysis and the GMM estimation based on the inter-provincial panel data. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2013;59(9):420-429. doi: 10.17221/6/2013-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Andreas P.K., Oriol R. (2011): Fiscal decentralization and government quality in the OECD. Economics Letters, 111: 191-193. Go to original source...
    2. Anke D.L., John C. (2007): Optimal land conversion and growth with uncertain biodiversity costs. Ecological Economics, 61: 542-549. Go to original source...
    3. Arellano M., Bond S. (1991): Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277-297. Go to original source...
    4. Arellano M., Bover O. (1995): Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-component models. Journal of Econometrics, 68: 29-51. Go to original source...
    5. Blundell R., Bond S. (1998): Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87: 115-143. Go to original source...
    6. Cheung N.S. (2008): The economic system of China. In: 2008 Chicago Conference on China's Economic Transformation. University of Chicago, July 14-18.
    7. Deng X.Z., Huang J.K., Rozelle S., Uchida E. (2006): Cultivated land conversion and potential agricultural productivity in China. Land Use Policy, 23: 372-384. Go to original source...
    8. Fan S.G., Kanbur R., Zhang X.b.(2011): China's regional disparities: Experience and policy. Review of Development Finance, 1: 47-56. Go to original source...
    9. Freeman L. (2001): The effects of sprawl on neighborhood social ties: An explanatory analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67: 69-77. Go to original source...
    10. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H.S. (1988): Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56: 1371-1395. Go to original source...
    11. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. (1997): Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Working Papers in Economics 9526. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
    12. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. (2003): Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 109: 53-74. Go to original source...
    13. Johnson M.P. (2001): Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning, 33: 717-735. Go to original source...
    14. Li J., Deng X.Z., Seto K.C. (2012): Multi-level modeling of urban expansion and cultivated land conversion for urban hotspot counties in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 108: 131-139. Go to original source...
    15. Li Y.L., Wu Q. (2007): An empirical study on the quantitative change of cultivated land: based on the current system of finance and taxation. China Population Resources and Environment, 12: 119-123. Go to original source...
    16. Lin G.C.S., Ho S.P.S. (2005): The state, land system, and land development processes in contemporary China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95: 411-436. Go to original source...
    17. Maddala G.S., Wu S. (1999): A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631-652. Go to original source...
    18. Pedroni P. (1999): Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653-670. Go to original source...
    19. Pedroni P. (2000): Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15: 93-130. Go to original source...
    20. Pedroni P. (2004): Panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20: 597-625. Go to original source...
    21. Pierse R.G., Shell A.J. (1995): Temporal aggregation and the power of tests for unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 65: 335-345. Go to original source...
    22. Seto K.C., Kaufmann R K. (2003): Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China: integrating remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Land Economies, 79: 106-121. Go to original source...
    23. Tan R., Beckmann V., Vandenberg L. (2009): Governing farmland conversion: comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany. Land Use Policy, 26: 961-974. Go to original source...
    24. Tan R., Qu F., Nico H. (2011): Rural to urban land conversion in China: How large is the over-conversion and what are its welfare implications?. China Economic Review, 22: 474-484. Go to original source...
    25. Tao R., Yuan F., Cao G.Z. (2007): Regional competition, land grant and local fiscal effect: based on city-level panel data analysis in China. The Journal of World Economy, 10: 15-27.
    26. Wang H., Tao R., Wang L.L., Su F.B. (2010): Farmland preservation and land development rights trading in Zhejiang, China. Habitat International, 34: 454-463. Go to original source...
    27. Wang Y. (2004): Environmental degradation and environmental threats in China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 90: 161-169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Wasilewski A., Krukowski, K. (2004): Land conversion for suburban housing: a study of urbanization around Warsaw and Olsztyn, Poland. Environmental Management, 34: 291-303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Wei Y. (1993): Urban land use transformation and determinants of urban land use size in China. Geo Journal, 30: 435-440. Go to original source...
    30. Xue B. (2011): Fiscal decentralization, intergovernmental competition and the structural deviation of land prices. Finance & Economics, 3: 49-57.
    31. Yang H., Li X. (2000): Cultivated land and food supply in China. Land Use Policy, 17: 73-88. Go to original source...
    32. Zhang J., Fu Y., Gao Y. (2007a): Why does China enjoy so much better physical infrastructure? Economic Research Journal, 4: 4-19.
    33. Zhang X., Chen J., Tan M., Sun Y. (2007b): Assessing the impact of urban sprawl on soil resources of Nanjing city using satellite images and digital soil databases. Catena, 69: 16-30. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content