Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(8):381-388 | DOI: 10.17221/107/2012-AGRICECON

Measurement of productive efficiency of tomato growers in Peshawar, PakistanOriginal Paper

Himayatullah KHAN, Farman ALI
Institute of Development Studies, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan

The present paper estimates the technical, allocative and economic efficiency of tomato growers. The study was conducted in two villages, namely, Tarnab and Akbarpura of the District Peshawar, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. The data were collected by conducting a farm level survey of 300 tomato growers in the study area. The findings show that there was a big gap between the maximum and minimum technical efficiency indices, with an average technical efficiency index of 66%. There was also a huge gap between the highest and the lowest index of allocative efficiency of tomato growers. Economic efficiency indices also varied significantly. The study concluded that the farmer education, extension visits, age and access to credit were the significant determinants of these efficiencies. One of the most important policy implications of this study is that there is enough potential to increase the present level of efficiencies for tomato production in the study area.

Keywords: equity and efficiency, economics, developing countries, economic change, economic development

Published: August 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
KHAN H, ALI F. Measurement of productive efficiency of tomato growers in Peshawar, Pakistan. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2013;59(8):381-388. doi: 10.17221/107/2012-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Abdellah A., Bakhsh K., Bashir A. (2006): Technical efficiency and its determinants in potato production function: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 11: 1-22. Go to original source...
  2. Aigner D.J., Lovell C.A.K, Schmidt P. (1977): Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6: 21-37. Go to original source...
  3. Alam A., Kobayashi H., Motsumura I., Ishida A., Esham M. (2012): Technical efficiency and its determinants in potato production: evidence from northern areas in Gilgit-Baltistan region. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 2: 1-17.
  4. Battese G.E. (1992): Frontier production function and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics, 7: 185-208. Go to original source...
  5. Bravo-Ureta B.E., Pinheiro A.E. (1997): Technical, economic, and allocative efficiency in peasant farming: Evidence from the Dominican Republic. The Developing Economies, 35: 48-67. Go to original source...
  6. Bravo-Ureta B.E., Pinheiro A.E. (1993): Efficiency analysis of developing country agriculture: a review of the frontier function literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 22: 88-101. Go to original source...
  7. Bravo-Ureta B.E., Evenson R.E. (1994): Efficiency in agricultural production: the case of peasant farmers in eastern Paraguay. Agricultural Economics, 10: 27-37. Go to original source...
  8. Farrell M.J. (1957): The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120: 253-290. Go to original source...
  9. Government of Pakistan (2009): Pakistan Economic Survey 2008-09. Finance Division, Economic Advisor's Wing, Islamabad.
  10. Javed M.I., Adil S.A., Raza M.A. (2010): Measurement of technical efficiency of rice-wheat system in Punjab, Pakistan using DEA technique. Journal of Agricultural Research, 2: 227-237.
  11. Kalirajan K. (1981): An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29: 283-294. Go to original source...
  12. Kalirajan K. (1991): The importance of efficient use in the adoption of technology: a micro panel data analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2: 113-126. Go to original source...
  13. Kalirajan K.P. (1999): Frontier production functions and technical efficiency measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13: 149-172. Go to original source...
  14. Kalirajan K., Flinn J.C. (1983): The measurement of farmspecific technical efficiency. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 2: 167-80.
  15. Kalirajan K., Shand R.T. (1985): Types of education and agricultural productivity: a quantitative analysis of tamil nadu rice farming. Journal of Development Studies, 21: 232-243. Go to original source...
  16. Khan H. (2012): Measurement of technical, allocative and economic efficiency of tomato farms in Northern Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B, 2: 1080-1090.
  17. Kopp R.J., Diewert W.E. (1982): The decomposition of frontier cost functions deviations into measures of technical and allocative efficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 19: 319-331. Go to original source...
  18. Kopp R.J., Smith V.K. (1980): Frontier production function estimates for steam electric generation. A comparative analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 47: 1049-1059. Go to original source...
  19. Mari F.M., Lohano H.D. (2007): Measuring production function and technical efficiency of onion, tomato and chilies in Sindh, Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 46: 1053-1064. Go to original source...
  20. Okike I., Jabbor M.A., Smith V.K., Akinwumi J.W., Ehui S.K. (2001): Agricultural Intensification and Efficiency in West Africa Savannahs: Evidence from Northern Nigeria. Socio-economic and Policy Research Working Paper 33. ILRI, Nairobi.
  21. Page M.J., John M. (1984): Firm size and technical efficiency: applications of production frontiers to Indian survey data. Journal of Development Economics, 16: 29-52. Go to original source...
  22. Parikh A., Shah M.K. (1994): Measurement of technical efficiency in the northwest frontier province of Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45: 132-138. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.