Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(5):195-201 | DOI: 10.17221/100/2012-AGRICECON
Effect of contract farming on the U.S. crop farmers' average returnOriginal Paper
- Department of Applied Economics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
In the literature of contract farming, most of the studies focus on the functions of risk managements and reducing transaction costs. Only a few study the effect of contract farming on the productivity efficiency or profitability. Literature in the crop sector is especially lacking. In this paper, we use a unique farm-level dataset (Agricultural Resource Management Survey from the U.S. Department of Agriculture) to examine the effect of contract farming on the farmers' average return for the corn, soybean and wheat producers. The matching estimation is used in the nature to compare the farmers' average return with or without participating contract farming. We first run a logit model to calculate the propensity score from the farmers' contracting decision problem. Then, use the propensity score to match farmers using the contracts and not using the contracts and compare their average returns. The empirical results show that contract farming has a positive effect on the corn and soybean producers' average return and insignificant effect on wheat producers'.
Keywords: average return, contract farming, grain industry marketing contract
Published: May 31, 2013 Show citation
References
- Ahearn M., Yee J., Korb P. (2005): Effects on differing farm policies on farm structure and dynamics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87: 1182-1189.
Go to original source...
- Allen D., Luke D. (1993): Transaction costs and the design of cropshare contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 24: 78-100.
Go to original source...
- Fukunaga K., Huffman W.E. (2009): The role of risk and transaction costs in contract design: Evidence from farmland lease contracts in U.S. agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91: 237-249.
Go to original source...
- Hobbs J. (1997): Measuring the importance of transaction costs in cattle marketing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79: 1083-1095.
Go to original source...
- Hu W.-Y., Phaneuf D., Zheng X. (2012): Quantify the benefits associated with the use of alternative marketing arrangements by the U.S. farmers. China Agricultural Economic Review, forthcoming.
- Katchova A.L., Miranda M. (2004): Two-step econometric estimation of farm characteristics affecting marketing contract decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86: 88-102.
Go to original source...
- Knoeber C. (1989): A real game of chicken: Contracts, tournaments, and the production of broilers. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 5: 271-292.
- Knoeber C., Thurman W. (1995): Don't count your chickens: Risk and risk shifting in the broiler industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77: 486-496.
Go to original source...
- Key N., McBride W. (2003): Production contracts and productivity in the U.S. hog sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85: 121-133.
Go to original source...
- Lambert D., Wilson W. (2003): Valuing varieties with imperfect output quantity measurement. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85: 95-107.
Go to original source...
- MacDonald J.M., Perry J., Ahearn M.C., Banker D., Chambers W., Dimitri C., Key N., Nelson K.E., Southard L.W. (2004): Contracts, Markets, and Prices: Organizing the Production and Use of Agricultural Commodities. USDA-ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 837. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=753567
Go to original source...
- MacDonald J., Korb P. (2011): Agricultural contracting update: Contracts in 2008. Economic Information Bulletin, EIB-72: 1-35.
Go to original source...
- Morrison C.P., Nehring R., Banker D. (2004): Productivity, economies and efficiency in U.S. agriculture: A look at contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86: 1308-1314.
Go to original source...
- Todd P. (2008): Matching Estimators: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan, New York; ISBN 0333786769.
Go to original source...
- Rosenbaum P., Rubin D.B. (1983): The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
Go to original source...
- Zheng X., Vukina T., Shin C. (2008): The role of farmers' risk aversion for contract choice in the U.S. hog industry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 6, Article 4. Available at http://www.bepress.com/jafio/vol6/iss1/art4
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.