Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(3):134-142 | DOI: 10.17221/106/2012-AGRICECON

India's exports performance in poultry products and the potential exports destinationsOriginal Paper

Sandeep SARAN1, Sarvesh KUMAR2, Lal Singh GANGWAR1
1 PrincipalScientist & Head, Poultry Economics and Agribusiness Research (PEAR) Section, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, India
2 Research Associate, Institute Technology Management Unit, PEAR Section, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, India

The study analyzes the trends in the Indian poultry products' exports during the pre- and the post-WTO periods using the Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filtered data. The Simpson Diversity Index (SDI) was used to measure the export diversity, whereas the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) and the Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA) ratios assessed the competitiveness of poultry products in the international market. India has been highly competitive in the exports of hen-eggs-in-shell and eggs-dried, whereas India needs to maintain its competitive position with respect to eggs-liquid and live-ducks. India could not retain its competitive position in live chicken exports due to the rising production cost coupled with the onslaught of the Avian Influenza (AI) in the recent years. Spreading of the AI put a heavy toll on poultry exports, especially chicken meat and eggs-liquid due to a complete ban on Indian poultry products imposed by many of the importing countries. The SDI indicated that poultry products' exports were more diversified during the post-WTO period. On the basis of the available data on the average ad-valorem applied duties faced by the Most Favoured Nations (MFN), the producers' price in various countries for chicken meat and eggs (hen-egg-in shell) and shipping charges from India to various countries, the lucrative export destinations for such poultry products were identified.

Keywords: competitiveness, diversity, exports, Indian, poultry, margins, trade, WTO

Published: March 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SARAN S, KUMAR S, GANGWAR LS. India's exports performance in poultry products and the potential exports destinations. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2013;59(3):134-142. doi: 10.17221/106/2012-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Balassa B. (1965): Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33: 99-124. Go to original source...
  2. Bardhan D. (2007): India's trade performance in livestock and livestock products. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62: 411-25.
  3. Birthal P.S., Taneja V.K. (2006): Livestock sector in India: Opportunities and challenges for smallholder. In: Proceedings of an ICAR-ILRI International Workshop, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi, India and International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.
  4. FAOSTAT database. Available at http://faostat.fao.org
  5. Fugazza M. (2004): Export performance and its determinants: Supply and demand constraints. In: Proceeding of United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
  6. Hodrick Prescott Filter. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/535/default.aspx#ancor
  7. James W.E., Naya S., Meir G.M. (1987): Asian Development: Economic Success and Policy Lessons. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  8. Jha B. (2000): Towards measuring comparative advantage of agricultural commodities in India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 13: 159-168.
  9. Kumar A., Ali J., Singh H. (2001): Trade in livestock products in India: trends, performance and competitiveness. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56: 653-567.
  10. Kumar A., Stall S.J., Singh N.P., Singh D.K. (2007): Livestock sector trade of India: Surging momentum in the new liberalized regime. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62: 395-410.
  11. Kumar N.R. (2008): Export of cucumber and gherkin from India: performance, destinations, competitiveness and determinants. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21: 130-138.
  12. Laursen K. (1998): Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialisation. DRUID Working Paper No. 98-30. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
  13. NSSO (1997): Consumption of Some Important Commodities in India, 1993-94. Report No. 404. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.
  14. NSSO (2001): Consumption of Some Important Commodities in India, 1999-2000. Report No. 461. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.
  15. NSSO (2007): Consumption of Some Important Commodities in India, 2004-05. Report No. 509. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.
  16. Simpson Diversity Index. Available at en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Diversity_index http://tariffdata.wto.org/ReportersAndProducts.aspx http://faostat.fao.org/site/703/default.aspx#ancoren.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hodrick%E2%80%93Prescott_filter

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.