Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(3):101-112 | DOI: 10.17221/110/2012-AGRICECON

Agri-food trade of the new member states since the EU accessionOriginal Paper

Áron TÖRÖK, Attila JÁMBOR
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

In 2004 and 2007, twelve New Member States (NMS) joined the European Union (EU), causing several changes in the field of agriculture. One of the major changes was the transformation of the national agri-food trade. The aim of the paper is to analyse the effects of the EU accession on the NMS agri-food trade, especially considering the revealed comparative advantages. The results suggest that the intensity of the NMS agri-food trade has increased significantly after the accession, though there was a serious deterioration in the NMS agri-food trade balance in most cases. It has also become evident that the NMS agri-food trade was highly concentrated by country and by product, though the concentration has not changed significantly after the EU accession. Moreover, our analyses highlight one of the most important characteristics of the NMS agri-food trade structure - the focus on the agri-food raw materials in export together with the agri-food processed products in import. As to the NMS agri-food trade specialisation, the diversity among member states becomes apparent. Almost all countries experienced a decrease in their comparative advantage after the accession, though it still remained at an acceptable level in most cases. As for the stability of the comparative advantage, the results suggest a weakening trend, underpinned by the convergence of the pattern of revealed comparative advantage. By estimating the survival function to the sample, it can be observed that the accession has radically changed the survival time of agri-food trade, meaning that the revealed comparative advantage has not turned out to be persistent in the period analysed. From the policy perspective, there is a clear need for structural changes in the NMS agriculture and agri-food sector in order to tackle the negative tendencies of the national agri-food trade. The most important long-term goal should be the production and export of higher value-added processed products based on domestic raw materials.

Keywords: agri-food trade, EU accession, New Member States

Published: March 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
TÖRÖK Á, JÁMBOR A. Agri-food trade of the new member states since the EU accession. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2013;59(3):101-112. doi: 10.17221/110/2012-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Balassa B. (1965): Trade liberalization and "revealed" comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33: 99-123. Go to original source...
  2. Bojnec ©., Fertő I. (2008a): Degree and pattern of agro-food trade integration of South-Eastern European countries with the European Union. In: Glauben T., Hanf J.H., Kopsidis M., Pieniadz A., Reinsberg K. (eds.): Agri-Food Business: Global Challenges - Innovative Solutions. Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe, Halle (Saale), 46: 118-133.
  3. Bojnec ©., Fertő I. (2008b): European enlargement and agro-food trade. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56: 563-579. Go to original source...
  4. Csaki C., Jambor A. (2009): The Diversity of Effects of EU Membership on Agriculture in New Member States. FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia, Policy Studies on Rural Transition, No. 2009-4, October.
  5. Csaki C., Jambor A. (2010): Five years of accession: impacts on agriculture in the NMS. EuroChoices, 9: 10-17. Go to original source...
  6. Dalum B., Laursen K., Villumsen G. (1998): Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: Despecialisation and 'stickiness'. International Review of Applied Economics, 12: 423-443. Go to original source...
  7. Eurostat (2011): Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home (accessed September 2011).
  8. Fertő I. (2008): The evolution of agri-food trade patterns in Central European countries. Post-Communist Economies, 20: 1-10. Go to original source...
  9. Hillman A.L. (1980): Observations on the relation between revealed comparative advantage and comparative advantage as indicated by pre-trade relative prices. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 116: 315-321. Go to original source...
  10. Hinloopen J., van Marrewijk C. (2001): On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137: 1-35. Go to original source...
  11. Hinloopen J., van Marrewijk C. (2008): Empirical relevance of the Hillman condition and the comparative advantage: 10 stylized facts. Applied Economics, 40: 2313-2328. Go to original source...
  12. Jambor A. (2010): Intra-industry trade of Hungarian agricultural products and the EU-accession. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 111: 95-114.
  13. Marchese S., de Simone F.N. (1989): Monotonicity of indices of revealed comparative advantage: Empirical evidence on Hillman's Condition. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 125: 158-67 Go to original source...
  14. Vollrath T.L. (1991): A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130: 265-279. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.