Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2013, 59(2):49-57 | DOI: 10.17221/28/2012-AGRICECON

Segmenting farms in European UnionOriginal Paper

Maria José Palma Lampreia DOS SANTOS
University of Lusófona do Porto, Porto, Portugal

The main objective of this work is to characterize and segment the farms of the twenty-seven Member States of the European Union (EU). For this purpose, the techniques of cluster analysis and cluster of cases segment the farms, based on a sample of farms of the Farm Accountancy and Information Network. The results show the existence of four types of farms in the EU that are distinguishable by their (i) structural characteristics, in particular, for their Utilized Agricultural Area, the total output, by the percentage of contract work and the total work, (ii) by their financial characteristics, i.e., by their total assets and the cash flow of the EU farms, and (iii) by their guidance and the importance of subsidies on these farms. These results thus suggest the definition of the Common Agricultural Policy differentiated and adapted to the existing four clusters of countries. We suggest the development of typologies of farms in the EU, with a more robust database involving different EU regions that constitute the different countries in order to obtain the robust types of farms from different European regions.

Keywords: CAP, cluster analysis, farms, typologies

Published: February 28, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
DOS SANTOS MJPL. Segmenting farms in European Union. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2013;59(2):49-57. doi: 10.17221/28/2012-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Andersen E., Elbersenb B., Godeschalkc F., Verhoogc D. (2007): Farm management indicators and farm typologies as a basis for assessments in a changing policy environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 82: 353-362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Argilés J.M., Slof E.J. (2003): The use of financial accounting information and firm performance; an empirical quantification for farms. Accounting and Business Research, 33: 251-273. Go to original source...
    3. Bašek V., Kraus J. (2011): Comparison of selected indicators of farms in the EU member states. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 57: 71-84. Go to original source...
    4. Commission of the European Community (2003): Proposal for a council regulation establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and support schemes for producers of certain crops and others. COM (2003) 23 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
    5. Damianos D., Skuras, D. (1996): Farm business and the development of alternative farm enterprises: an empirical analysis in Greece. Journal of Rural Studies, 12: 273-283. Go to original source...
    6. Daskalopoulou I., Petrou A. (2002): Utilising a farm typology to identify potential adopters of alternative farming activities in Greek agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 18: 95-103. Go to original source...
    7. Davidova S., Gorton M., Iraizoz, B., Ratinger T. (2003): Variations in farm performance in transitional economies: evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53: 173-361. Go to original source...
    8. Decision 85/377/EEC (1985): Commission decision of the 7 June 1985 establishing a Community typology for agricultural holdings. Official Journal L 220, pp. 1-32.
    9. Divila E., Sokol Z. (1999): Problémy klasifikace a třídění zemědělských podniků. (Problems of agricultural enterprises classification and sorting.) Agricultural Economics - Czech, 45: 459-466.
    10. Dos Santos M.J.P.L., Henriques P.D.S., Fragoso R.M.S., Da Silva Carvalho M.L.P.V. (2010a): Attitudes from Portuguese farmers to Common Agricultural Policy. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 460-469. Go to original source...
    11. Dos Santos M.J.P.L., Fragoso R.M.S., Henriques P.D.S., Carvalho M.L.S. (2010b): The agricultural competitiveness in Alqueva Portuguese irrigation project under the 2003 CAP Reform and the Health Check. New Medit - Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment, 9: 11-18.
    12. FADN (2008): FADN public Database. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/database/database_en.cfm (accessed on July, 2011).
    13. Gebauer R.H. (1987): Socio-economic classification of farm households - conceptual, methodical and empirical considerations. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 14: 261-283. Go to original source...
    14. Gloy B., Akridge J. (1999): Segmenting the commercial producer marketplace for agricultural inputs. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2: 145-163. Go to original source...
    15. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. (1998): Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall International, New Jersey.
    16. Hair J.R., Black B., Babin B., Anderson R.E. (2005): Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Maxwell MacMillan Editions, New York.
    17. Iraizoz B., Gorton M., Davidova S. (2007): Segmenting farms for analysing agricultural trajectories: a case study of the Navarra region in Spain. Agricultural Systems, 93: 143-169. Go to original source...
    18. Köbrich C., Rehman T., Khan M. (2003): Typification of farming systems for constructing representative farming models: two illustrations of the application of meliorative analyses in Chile and Pakistan. Agricultural Systems, 76: 141-157. Go to original source...
    19. Paul C.J.M., Nehring R. (2005): Product diversification, production systems, and economic performance in U.S. agricultural production. Journal of Econometrics, 126: 525-548. Go to original source...
    20. Podruzsiki S., Hubard C., Keszthel S., Hubbard L. (2008): Farm income variability in Hungary: A comparison with the EU based on FADN records. Paper prepared for presentation at the 108 st EAAE Seminar 'Income stabilisation in a changing agricultural world: policy and tools', Warsaw, Poland, 8-9 February, 2008.
    21. Regulation 79/65/EEC (1965): Regulation 79/65/EEC of the Council of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community. Official Journal P 109, p. 1859.
    22. Rosenberg A., Turvey C. (1991): Identifying management profiles of Ontario swine producers through cluster analysis. Review of Agricultural Economics, 13: 201-213. Go to original source...
    23. Silva E., Berbel J. (2007): An Azorean farms typology. New Medit - Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment, 6: 51-54.
    24. Soule M.J., Tegene A., Wiebe K.D. (2000): Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82: 993-1005. Go to original source...
    25. USDA (2000): ERS Farm Typology for a Diverse Agricultural Sector. Agriculture Information Bulletin No 759, Resource Economics Division, ERS.
    26. USDA (2001): Structural and Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms: 2001 Family Farm Report. Agriculture Information Bulletin No 768, Resource Economics Division, ERS.
    27. Villatora M., Langemeier M. (2005): Factors Impacting Farm Growth. Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association 37 Annual Meeting. Little Rock, Arkansas, February 6-9.
    28. Ward J.H. (1963): Hierarquical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58: 236-244. Go to original source...
    29. Weiss C.R. (1999): Farm growth and survival: Econometric evidence for individual farms in Upper Austria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81: 103-116. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content