Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2012, 58(11):497-509 | DOI: 10.17221/215/2011-AGRICECON

The distributional effects of agricultural policy reforms in Switzerland

Nadja El Benni1, Robert Finger1, Stefan Mann2, Bernard Lehmann1
1 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), Zurich, Switzerland
2 Research Station Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART, Ettenhausen, Switzerland

This paper analyses the effects of Swiss agricultural policy reforms and the effects of farm income, off-farm income and direct payments on the distribution of the farm household income. To this end, the farm-level income records from the FADN data for the period 1990-2009 are used to calculate Gini coefficients and Gini elasticities. Bootstrap sampling procedures are applied to test for significant differences of the estimated parameters over time. The Gini coefficients estimated in our analysis show that the household income inequality in Swiss agriculture only slightly increased from 0.21 to 0.24, but the farm income inequality strongly increased from 0.27 to 0.38 in the considered period. We find furthermore that increasing off-farm incomes and direct payments would decrease the household income inequality. Especially direct payments that support farmers producing under adverse production conditions in the hill and mountain regions have found to be well targeted and thus contribute to the reductions in income inequality in agriculture.

Keywords: agricultural policy reform, direct payments, Gini coefficient, income inequality

Published: November 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
El Benni N, Finger R, Mann S, Lehmann B. The distributional effects of agricultural policy reforms in Switzerland. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2012;58(11):497-509. doi: 10.17221/215/2011-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Allanson P. (2005): The Impact of Farm Income Support on Absolute Inequality. Paper for the 94 th EAAE Seminar, 9-10 April 2005, Ashford, UK.
  2. Boisvert R.N., Ranney C. (1990): Accounting for the importance of non-farm income on farm family income inequality in New York. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 19: 1-11. Go to original source...
  3. Chen C.-N., Tsaur T., Rhai T.S. (1982): The Gini coefficient and negative income. Oxford Economic Papers, 36: 473-476. Go to original source...
  4. Curry N., Stucki E. (1997): Swiss agricultural policy and the environment: an example for the rest of Europe to follow? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40: 465-482. Go to original source...
  5. DiCiccio T.J., Efron B. (1996): Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical Science, 11: 189-212. Go to original source...
  6. El Benni N., Lehmann B. (2010): Swiss agricultural policy reform: landscape changes in consequence of national agricultural policy and international competition pressure. In: Primdahl J., Swaffield S. (eds.): Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes - Change Patterns and Policy trends in Developed Countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 73-94. Go to original source...
  7. Engler M. (2010): Redistribution in Switzerland: Social Cohesion or Simple Smoothing of Lifetime Incomes? Discussion Paper No. 2010-02, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
  8. FAT (2000): Neue Methodik für die Zentrale Auswertung von Buchhaltungsdaten an der FAT. Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Agrarwirtschaft und Landtechnik (FAT), Tänikon.
  9. Fei J.C.H., Ranis G., Kuo S.W.Y. (1978): Growth and the family distribution of income by factor components. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92: 17-53. Go to original source...
  10. Finger R. (2010): Evidence of slowing yield growth - the example of Swiss cereal yields. Food Policy, 35: 175-182. Go to original source...
  11. Finger R., El Benni N. (2011): Spatial analysis of income inequality in agriculture. Economics Bulletin, 31: 2138- 2150.
  12. Flückiger Y., Silber J. (1995): Income inequality decomposition by income source and the breakdown of inequality differences between two population subgroups. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 131: 599-615.
  13. FOA (2010): Agricultural report 2010. Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture, Bern, Switzerland.
  14. Gerfin M. (1994): Income distribution, income inequality and life cycle effects - a nonparametric analysis for Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 130: 509-522.
  15. Hill B. (1999): Farm household incomes: perceptions and statistics. Journal of Rural Studies, 15: 345-358. Go to original source...
  16. Keeney M. (2000): The distributional impact of direct payments on Irish farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51: 252-263. Go to original source...
  17. Lerman R.I., Yitzhaki S. (1985): Income inequality effects by income source: a new approach and applications to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67: 151-156. Go to original source...
  18. Mann S. (2003): Doing it the Swiss way. EuroChoices, 2: 32-35. Go to original source...
  19. Mann S. (2005): Implicit social policy in agriculture. Social Policy and Society, 4: 271-281. Go to original source...
  20. Mann S. (2006): Direktzahlungen aus sozialpolitischer Perspektive am Beispiel der Schweizer Landwirtschaft. Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft, 84: 116-127.
  21. Mishra A., El-Osta H., Gillespie J.M. (2009): Effect of agricultural policy on regional income inequality among farm households. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31: 325- 340. Go to original source...
  22. Moreddu C. (2011): Distribution of Support and Income in Agriculture. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 46, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  23. OECD (1998): Agriculture in a Changing World: Which Policies for Tomorrow? Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris.
  24. Podder N. (1995): On the relationship between the Gini coefficient and income elasticity. Sankya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, 57 (Series B, Part 3): 428-432.
  25. Podder N., Chatterjee S. (2002): Sharing the national cake in post reform New Zealand; income inequality trends in terms of income sources. Journal of Public Economics, 86: 1-27. Go to original source...
  26. Pyatt G., Chau-nan C., Fei J. (1980): The distribution of income by factor components. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95: 451-473. Go to original source...
  27. R Development Core Team (2011): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at www.R-project.org
  28. Schmid E., Hofreither M.F., Sinabell F. (2006): Impacts of CAP Instruments on the Distribution of Farm Incomes - Results for Austria. Discussion paper DP-13-2006, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.
  29. Schenker N., Gentleman J.F. (2001): On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55: 182-186. Go to original source...
  30. Stuart A. (1954): The correlation between variate-values and ranks in samples from a continuous distribution. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 7: 37-44. Go to original source...
  31. Van de Ven J. (2001): Distributional Limits and the Gini Coefficient. Research Paper Number 776, January 2001, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
  32. von Witzke H., Noleppa S. (2007): Agricultural and Trade Policy Reform and Inequality: The Distributive Effects of Direct Payments to German Farmers under the EU's New Common Agricultural Policy. Working Paper Series No. 79/2007, Institute for Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin.
  33. Zürcher B.A. (2004): Income inequality and mobility: a nonparametric decomposition analysis by age for Switzerland in the 80s and 90s. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 140: 265-292.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.