Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2012, 58(1):10-20 | DOI: 10.17221/178/2010-AGRICECON

Consumers' perceptions of food risk management quality: Chinese and Korean evaluations

Renee B. Kim
Faculty of Business, International Business, HanYang University, Seoul, Korea

Risks, including food risks, are found to be different between the perceptions of 'experts' and consumers, thus understanding the potential difference in the perceptions of the effective food risk management (FRM) between consumers and experts is important in developing effective FRM strategies. This information enables policy makers to integrate societal concerns and values into risk management and communication regarding food safety and to enhance the public confidence in the authorities' approach to the food safety management. The purpose of this study is to understand how consumers evaluate the quality of the food risk management practices that are performed by the government and to determine the underlying psychological factors influencing consumer evaluations of food risk management quality (FRMQ). A comparative survey study was conducted in China and Korea, and the measurement scales used in the structural model were found to be configurally and metrically invariant between these two countries. The results show the difference in the perception of Chinese and Korean consumers regarding their evaluation for the FRMQ. While the perceived expertise of food risk managers was found to be the most important determinant in China, the proactive consumer protection was found to be the most important one in Korea. The scepticism in risk assessment and the communication practice was found to be second most important factor both in China and Korea. These results shed lights at the future policy recommendations.

Keywords: food risk management, consumer evaluation, food safety

Published: January 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kim RB. Consumers' perceptions of food risk management quality: Chinese and Korean evaluations. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2012;58(1):10-20. doi: 10.17221/178/2010-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W. (1988): Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411-423. Go to original source...
  2. Agarwal J., Malhotra N.K. (2005): An integrated model of attitude and affect: theoretical foundation and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 58: 483-493. Go to original source...
  3. Burstein P. (1991): Policy domain: organization, culture, and policy outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17: 327-350. Go to original source...
  4. Bynre D. (2002): EFSA: Excellence, Integrity and Openness. In: Inaugural Meeting of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority, 18 September 2002, Brussels.
  5. Campbell A., Converse P.E., Rodgers W.L. (1976): The Quality of American Life. Russell Sage Foundation, Rutgers University Press, New York.
  6. De Boer M., McCarthy M., Brennan M., Kelly A.L., Ritson C. (2005): Public understanding of food risk issues and food risk messages on the island of Ireland: The views of food safety experts. Journal of Food Safety, 25: 241-265. Go to original source...
  7. De Garidel-Thoron T. (2005): Welfare-improving asymmetric information in dynamic insurance markets. Journal of Political Economy, 113: 121-150. Go to original source...
  8. Dellios R., Yang X.H., Yilmaz N.K. (2009): Food safety and the role of the government: implications for CSR policies in China. iBusiness, 1: 75-84. Go to original source...
  9. Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A. (2000): Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. Sage, Thousand Oaks. Go to original source...
  10. Douglas M., McCarthy M., Brenna M., Kelly A.L., Ritson C. (2005): Public understanding of food risk issues and food risk messages on the island of Ireland: The views of food safety experts. Journal of Food Safety, 25: 241-265. Go to original source...
  11. Dranove D., Kessler D., McCleelan M., Satterthwaite M. (2003): Is more information better? The effects of 'report cards' on health care providers. Journal of Political Economy, 111: 555-588. Go to original source...
  12. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975): Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading.
  13. Fischler C. (1998): Riason et deraison dans la perception des risqué alimentarires (Sense and nonsense in alimentary risk perception). Cahier de Nutrition et de Deitetique, 33: 297-300.
  14. Frewer L., van Trijp H. (2007): Understanding Consumers of Food Products. Woodhead Publishing in Food Science and Technology, Cambridge. Go to original source...
  15. Frewer L.J., Koles A., van de Kroon S., Lawere C. (2005): Consumer acceptance of animal husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18: 345-367. Go to original source...
  16. Frewer L., Miles S., Marsh R. (2002): The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 22: 701-711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Grunert S.G. (2005): Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32: 369-391. Go to original source...
  18. Hansen J., Holm L., Frewer L.J., Robinson P., Sandoe P. (2003): Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41: 111-121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Houghton J.R. Van Kleef E., Rowe G., Frewer L.J. (2006): Consumer perceptions of the effectiveness of food risk management practices: A cross-cultural study. Health, Risk & Society, 8: 165-183. Go to original source...
  20. Hovland C.I., Janis I.L., Kelley H.H. (1953): Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. Yale University Press, New Haven.
  21. Hughes D. (1995): Animal welfare: the consumer and the food industry. British Food Journal, 97: 3-7. Go to original source...
  22. Kafka C., von Alvensleben R. (1998): Consumer perception of food-related hazards and the problem of risk communication. In: 4th Plenary Meeting Food for Consumer. Measurement of consumer attitudes. AIR-CAT, 4: 21-40.
  23. Kennedy D. (1988): Humans in the chemical decision chain. In: Cater H.O., Nuckton C.F. (eds.): Chemicals in the Human Food Chain: Sources, Options and Public Policy. Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Davis, CA.
  24. Kim R.B. (2008): The impact of food safety concerns on KORUS FTA: Meeting the public concerns about beef safety. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22: 141-152. Go to original source...
  25. Kramer C. (1990): Food safety: the consumer side of the environmental issue. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22: 33-40.
  26. Krystallis A., Frewer L., Rowe G., Houghton J., Kehagia O., Perrea, T. (2007): A perceptual divide? Consumer and expert attitudes to food risk management in Europe. Health, Risk and Society, 9: 407-424. Go to original source...
  27. Langford I., Marris C., O'Riordan T. (1999): Public reactions to risk: social structures, images, of science, and the role of trust. In: Bennett P., Calman K. (eds.): Risk Communication and Public Health. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 33-50.
  28. Lazo J.K., Kinnell J., Fisher A. (2000): Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20: 179-193. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Meijboom F.L.B., Visak T., Brom F.W.A. (2006): From trust to trustworthiness: why information is not enough in the food sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19: 427-442. Go to original source...
  30. Micklitz H.-W. (2000): International regulation on health, safety, and the environment - trends and challenges. Journal of consumer policy, 23: 3-24. Go to original source...
  31. Miles S., Brennan M., Kuznesof S., Ness M., Ritson C., Frewer L.J. (2004): Public worry about specific food safety issues. British Food Journal, 106: 9-22. Go to original source...
  32. Mittal B., Lee M.S. (1989): A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 363-389. Go to original source...
  33. O'Sullivan C., Scholderer J., Cowan C. (2005): Measurement equivalence of the food related lifestyle instrument (FRL) in Ireland and Great Britain. Food Quality and Preference, 16: 1-12. Go to original source...
  34. Pardo J.V., Pardo P.J., Raichle M.E. (1993): Neural correlates of self-induced dysphoria. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 713-719. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Peterson R.A., Wilson W.R. (1992): Measuring customer satisfaction: fact and artifact. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20: 61-71. Go to original source...
  36. Renn O., Rohrmann B. (eds.) (2000): Cross-Cultural Risks Perception Research. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Go to original source...
  37. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. (2005): A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25: 3-29. Go to original source...
  38. Serences R., Rajcaniova M. (2007): Food safety-public goods. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53: 385-391. Go to original source...
  39. Slovic P. (1993): Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13: 675-682. Go to original source...
  40. Slovic P. (1987): Perception of risk. Science, 236: 280- 285. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Shepperd B. H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P.R. (1988): The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343. Go to original source...
  42. Shook C.L., David J. Ketchen D.J., Jr., Hult G.T.M., Kacmar K.M. (2004): An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 397-404. Go to original source...
  43. Smith D., Riethmuller P. (2000): Consumer concerns about food safety in Australia and Japan. British Food Journal, 102: 838-855. Go to original source...
  44. Sparks P., Shepherd R. (1994): Public perceptions of foodrelated hazards: individual and social dimensions. Food Quality and Preferences, 5: 185-194. Go to original source...
  45. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Baumgaratner H. (1998): Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25: 78-90. Go to original source...
  46. Steenkamp J.B.E.M., Baumgartner H. (1998): Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25: 78-90. Go to original source...
  47. Thonney P.F., Bisogni C.A. (1991): Food safety policy: a shared responsibility. Human Ecology Forum, 19: 13-15.
  48. Van Kleef E. Houghton J.R., Krystallis A., Pfenning U., Rowe G., Van Dijk H., Van der Lans I.A., Frewer L.J. (2007): Consumer evaluations of food risk management quality in Europe. Risk Analysis, 27: 1565-1580. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Verbeke W. (2005): Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32: 347-368. Go to original source...
  50. Vos E. (2000): EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23: 227- 255. Go to original source...
  51. Wall J., Pidgeon N., Weyman A., Horlick-Jones T. (2004): Critical trust: Understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation. Health, Risk & Society, 6: 133-150. Go to original source...
  52. Worosz M.R., Knight A.J., Harris C.K. (2008): Resilience in the US red meat industry: the role of food safety policy. Agriculture and Human Values, 25: 187-191. Go to original source...
  53. Yasui A. (2004): New food control system in Japan and food analysis at NFRI. Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement, 9: 568-570. Go to original source...
  54. Yoo B., Donthu N., Lee S. (2000): An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28: 195-211. Go to original source...
  55. Zhang T. (2008): The efficiency assessment of food safety in China's agriculture: a case study of the rice sector, Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 521-528. Arrived on 17th December 2010 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.